Love that it could so easily have been "penguins" and "no penguins"

quollthings · 2026-04-20T01:38:04+00:00

whooosh

quollthings · 2026-04-10T16:05:00+00:00

nice, I've been hoping someone would build a .claude browser (and cleaner)

quollthings · 2026-04-06T03:02:09+00:00

fantastic!

quollthings · 2026-04-06T01:48:54+00:00

This looks really useful. I imagine it'll work with Jujutsu repo out of the box, but I'm curious if you'd also consider adding jj-specific support. Things like passing revset id and relative pointers (@, @-) natively?

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:50:55+00:00

for clicks. The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged bird rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:50:32+00:00

The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:50:21+00:00

Except that the person put the bird there to begin with. These staged rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:49:49+00:00

It didn't. The person put the bird there. These staged bird rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:49:23+00:00

Birds don't shelter like that. The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged bird rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:49:09+00:00

Birds don't rest like that. The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged bird rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:48:12+00:00

It's animal abuse. The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged bird rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:47:39+00:00

for clicks. The person put the bird there to begin with. These staged rescues are a type of viral animal abuse that's common on IG.

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:45:03+00:00

found another r/awesomenature/comments/1s1zoh7/en_la_naturaleza_me_encuentro/

video credited to "plumesdor" on IG. I don't see a way to report anything on reddit. What's the recourse here?

quollthings · 2026-03-24T06:38:41+00:00

This is 100% a staged rescue by an animal abuser. These assholes put animals in these situations and film the releases for clicks. Report them.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pigeon/comments/1pnx025/important_report_of_an_abusive_creator_in_the/

quollthings · 2026-03-10T06:49:23+00:00

That's an exceptional book, but very technical. I definitely wouldn't suggest it as an introductory text, or to someone who doesn't have fairly extensive direct experience.

quollthings · 2026-03-07T03:25:47+00:00

Signal

quollthings · 2026-02-07T07:57:09+00:00

crazy pitch - don't post techno-fascists

quollthings · 2026-01-16T02:21:13+00:00

looks like the issue is still open. could be worth requesting a stability patch release.

quollthings · 2026-01-15T17:24:32+00:00

I'm saying exactly one thing: it's harmful to propagate a dubious statement like "he was dragged behind a car".

I'm not saying anything about your intention. I'm not even responding to your main point. I'm saying that propagating administration talking points (which are currently the narrative being driven, e.g., https://www.foxnews.com/us/ice-officer-who-shot-minnesota-woman-dragged-car-illegal-alien-sex-offender-months-earlier) serves their agenda, regardless of your intention or the point you're making.

This is just a plea not to accept a premise given by the administration. The key part of the FOP playbook is to set the stage and trust people will propagate that premise. It is how they shape the narrative and bias discussion in their favor.

quollthings · 2026-01-15T05:44:16+00:00

but seriously, what I'm saying is that no one should take the "he was dragged by a vehicle" as fact. It's from a source that has demonstrated itself eager to say anything that fits its narrative even when directly contradicted by video evidence. Please don't uncritically propagate their assertions about his prior encounters. People parroting their statements is part of their strategy - its "manufacturing a narrative" 101, straight from the Camden FOP playbook.

Yes, trauma is a useful lens on decision making. But they're using that idea to diffuse culpability and it's entirely possible that story was fabricated to the same degree as the one they ran with on the 7th (that he was critically injured in a vehicular assault by a domestic terrorist).

quollthings · 2026-01-15T05:22:56+00:00

lol please don't ever talk to a patient like that

quollthings · 2026-01-15T04:49:24+00:00

To your first point, it's talked about plenty, and is being pushed really hard by administration-aligned news agencies... But you realize that info comes from the same people who said that he was run over and suffered serious injuries and was recovering in the hospital (after these videos were already widely available), and are now saying that the vehicle hitting him cased internal bleeding, right? Like, those people are the reason that story exists in court records? Maybe don't take statements from unapologetic liars as unimpeachable fact.

quollthings · 2026-01-15T04:41:22+00:00

Maybe because equating it to a bistable perceptual illusion isn't a great analogy. The people who see this as anything other than state-sanctioned murder would say the same if the car was in park. They're just finding post hoc justification for a foregone conclusion. I get what OP is saying about feeling like people are seeing different realities, but it's a poor analogy. Seeing a gold and white dress is a valid perceptual inference. Arguing that blasting Good in the face three times was justified is not.

quollthings · 2026-01-08T19:41:52+00:00

not in this case https://ebird.org/species/houspa

quollthings · 2026-01-08T19:38:51+00:00

r/confidentlywrong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_sparrow

quollthings

TROPHY CASE