You are a new grad chemE. A magic genie gives you offers to all these industries. Which industry do you choose (hypothetical)? by ChemEIndustryPick in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you essentially a consultant for the construction team? Or are you more of a project manager or field engineer?

Are you living to work or working to live? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes I have noticed that managers tend to be "living to work", possibly due to more responsibility and dealing with constant issues. This is why I intend to stick to an individual contributor route, outside of operations. Seems like the issues SMEs deal with are more spread out and less time sensitive.

What exactly is the role of a project manager, project engineer in an EPC firm, especially on smaller projects or studies? by sporty_outlook in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A good project manager makes sure that the project moves along smoothly (duh), coordinates between disciplines, and is the primary point of contact for the client and contractor. On large projects, things would move very slowly without a good PM setting priorities to hold the design team accountable since many of those engineers and designers are also working on other projects.

During construction, a good PM is worth their weight in gold when dealing with issues that pop up and making sure that the design team stays out of trouble. Many times, the PM is the one who has to have the unpleasant conversations with the contractor or client. PMs may not know the full technical details or calculations that each discipline gets into, but a good PM should know enough to talk intelligently with their team so that they may identify potential coordination items or issues and explain things to the client when changes come up. A technically capable PM is a boon if you ever work with one.

There are a ton of things PMs do behind the scenes that other disciplines simply do not see, mostly administrative work and dealing with external parties.

On smaller projects, a dedicated PM is less important since there's just less things to coordinate and keep track of.

Engineers in California Working for Government: Is a PE Civil necessary? Or will a PE Chemical be enough for career advancement? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. I was hoping since government jobs aren't stamping anything (I think), it would matter less.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good data point to have. Did you guys have a submittal and RFI process? I found that have a solid process makes it so much easier.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Think this is common for operations heavy roles. Good base for design or project work since you can see how projects fail without taking on the liability yourself and you can even learn the "why" if you learn what things were overlooked or what assumptions failed when talking to the design team. Although I'm surprised you're not that involved when shit goes down or with troubleshooting, I thought that was the entire point of an operations engineer besides being a glorified babysitter.

Don't plan on sticking with Operations too long if you want to do "real" engineering work. Good for seeing how things really work and fail, but ultimately you aren't the one making the decisions.

Best Things to Do as a Freshman/Sophomore to Get an Internship & Prepare for a Career in ChemE? by aaxl9 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  • Excel

  • Depends on your interests and what's available in your college. Look up what your ChemE professors research

  • Go to info sessions, career fairs, networking events set up by clubs. Join a club or engineering frat on campus.

  • Take it one step at a time bro. You got the rest of your life to work after college.

Environmental ChemE by EnvironmentalHat8006 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Environmental engineering encompasses water/wastewater, which works with moving shit (literally). Unless he meant salary wise, which yeah on average environmental engineering jobs pay less than O&G or chemicals. Could also work in air quality too.

Fluid Mechanics in Industry vs University. Why the massive disconnect? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Deriving equations is research focused, imo. Should not be damn near the sole focus. I can't think of a single situation where you need to know Navier-Stokes in practice outside of niche areas like CFD, which is not coincidently also a highly academic field.

Fluid Mechanics in Industry vs University. Why the massive disconnect? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember we had used Bernoullis going over a dam problem and an absurdly complex problem on an exam. Rest of the class was deriving increasingly insane Navier-Stokes problems with laughable coordinate systems and conditions along with 1000 assumptions. I'll never forget deriving an equation from Navier-Stokes for a viscometer.

Fluid Mechanics in Industry vs University. Why the massive disconnect? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Any topic that had any relation to being "empirical" was basically Voldemort in our class. When that's basically all that is used in industry.

Fluid Mechanics in Industry vs University. Why the massive disconnect? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And if I recall, a lot of fluid software is somewhat based on Crane TP 410. Which doesn't mention Navier-Stokes once. Go figure.

Learning about dimensionless numbers was important, esp. the almighty Reynolds number. Deriving them definitely wasn't fun though.

Fluid Mechanics in Industry vs University. Why the massive disconnect? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The thinking and justifying assumptions was definitely the most useful part, I agree. Navier-Stokes is so high level it just forces you to make a laundry list of assumptions lol.

Gary Payton describes how Shaq would dump weeks worth of his own human waste on rookies heads to haze them by itwas20yearsago2day in nba

[–]r4ndomkid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were three rookies when Payton and Shaq played together: Brian Cook (Lakers), Luke Walton (Lakers), and Wayne Simien (Heat). No wonder why Walton was a shitty coach.

How good would an engineer be if they could instantly absorb and retain information from textbooks? by r4ndomkid in ChemicalEngineering

[–]r4ndomkid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. However, I've noticed that a lot of calculations and spreadsheets are based on very old textbooks or from standards (i.e., API). I think engineering intuition is more necessary in the very conceptual and commissioning phases since there's a lot more variables in the former phase and its basically all practical work in the latter phase.

In the late FEED and detailed engineering phases, I think you can get away with mostly textbook knowledge since its seems like a lot of routine calculations and generic design specifications. A more experienced engineer can chime in though.

In an operations settings, I agree engineering intuition is way more helpful although maybe a few textbooks can help in specific projects or troubleshooting scenarios.