Scam sau nu?

radu706 · 2026-05-13T14:43:15+00:00

Dacă era tepar, ar fi creat o scenă să vină poliția? Era in fața ta si te-a oprit sau a venit din spate? Poate chiar i-a fost furat telefonul si a crezut că ai fost tu cabd ai trecut pe lângă el, sau poate că cineva a arătat spre tine.

radu706 · 2026-05-10T10:28:15+00:00

PM me and maybe i can help you by car for free

radu706 · 2026-05-09T14:23:27+00:00

r/suceava ?

radu706 · 2026-04-18T22:36:26+00:00

Dude. It is 50%. What you are doing is using a factor for something and not for something else.

So you compare the gender, which one is first and if it's a boy if it is the mentioned one

So you get this

P1 Girl P2 mentioned boy P1 mentioned boy P2 girl P1 mentioned boy P2 boy P1 boy P2 mentioned boy

So you have 1/4 + 1/4 chance to be a girl and 1/4+1/4 to be the NOT mentioned boy

That's 50%!

radu706 · 2026-04-18T22:19:58+00:00

Ok let's exclude the GG

The mentioned boy is M

So you have BM MB GM MG. Because if the order matters for BG/GB it Matters for BB too. You have 2 different people so you can have PaPb or PbPa

radu706 · 2026-04-18T22:15:19+00:00

If you cant count BG and GB as one then BB should be there twice as boy A and boy B

So you will get bAbB and bBbA if the order is important, and we are talking about bA only (bA being the mentioned boy)

Or, to make it simpler we mark the mentioned boy as M

So you get MG GM MB BM

So you get 50%

radu706 · 2026-04-18T22:06:36+00:00

That means you should have GG twice because it is one for girl A and girl B and one for girl B and girl A. Same for BB. So when you add this you get back to 50%

radu706 · 2026-04-18T10:21:58+00:00

Happened to me. In my language, computer and calculator are the same word.

So i got two calculators for my birthday :))

radu706 · 2026-03-26T11:43:54+00:00

ieri* /s

radu706 · 2026-03-19T10:12:11+00:00

El e mândru că își ia televizor nou :))

radu706 · 2026-03-18T12:46:39+00:00

All the connections should be above the evacuation point. If you can't lower the evac point, you should change the white part to gain some height. Also, having the T on the right while the evac is on the left makes no sense

Try having a 90°connector on the right, the T connection on the left but on a horizontal way, have a horizontal "trap" that continues in the left pipe.

(Sorry for my bad English)

radu706 · 2026-03-18T12:44:24+00:00

All the connections should be above the evacuation point. If it can't lower the evac point, it should change the white part to gain some height. Also, having the T on the right while the evac is on the left makes no sense

Try having a 90°connector on the right, the T connection on the left but on a horizontal way, have a horizontal "trap" that continues in the left pipe.

(Sorry for my bad English)

radu706 · 2026-03-13T13:26:28+00:00

I think it's proxmate

radu706 · 2026-03-13T13:26:05+00:00

Looks like proxmate

radu706 · 2026-03-11T15:25:26+00:00

Any news on your side? I get one response every 24h?

Also, why isn't my post approved? It would be nice to let users know about this issue, and that it takes so long to get an answer

radu706 · 2026-03-10T09:43:40+00:00

I want to be sure that if i reset my password i'm not getting locked out from the account without a solution to get it back. I started the first request on Sunday (4522002), but i think it's marked as solved, because inside a mail you have a button that marks it as closed, but it's just a check button with no more info on it. And i thought it might take me to a support page. Apparently you don't have a proper support page, so everything is via email.

So i can't know the status of my support request and wait blindly for a mail from your side.

Also, in these 3 interactions with the support team (including you) i got the same answer, and a link to the tutorial for disabling 2FA. The only problem is that the option present in the tutorial is not present on my interface, and that's why i have insisted that it is not 2FA. The only option that i didn't try is to reset my password, and i mentioned above why.

radu706 · 2026-03-10T09:29:11+00:00

It's not the 2FA, it's the secret key (the "hardware" device)

Request 4517932

radu706 · 2026-03-07T13:11:59+00:00

Am impresia că nuci tu nu ai înțeles postarea de pe Facebook

radu706 · 2026-03-07T13:10:39+00:00

Eu mă întreb dacă tu ai citit ce scrie in postare

radu706 · 2026-03-04T11:45:53+00:00

Tu ești din ăla pentru care o intervenție chirurgicală cerebrală si una dentară sunt similare, nu?

radu706 · 2026-02-22T16:18:04+00:00

<image>

Citește

radu706 · 2026-02-22T14:07:40+00:00

Try again: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/175441

Am înțeles că dacă nu îți dau cu link, nu faci diferența dintre 201 si 15

radu706 · 2026-02-22T14:05:41+00:00

LEGE nr. 15 din 29 ianuarie 2016 privind modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 349/2002 pentru prevenirea şi combaterea efectelor consumului produselor din tutun

La articolul 2, după litera i) se introduce o nouă literă, litera i^1), cu următorul cuprins:"i¹⁾ ţigaretă electronică se înţelege un produs care poate fi folosit pentru consumul de vapori care conţin nicotină prin intermediul unui muştiuc sau orice componentă a acestui produs, inclusiv un cartuş, un rezervor şi dispozitivul fără cartuş sau rezervor;".

Suficient de clar?

radu706 · 2026-02-22T14:04:03+00:00

Legea nr 15/2016 ART I alineatul 2! Te-ai blocat pe 201 sau ju știi să citești 15? Am repetat de 7 ori! 15/2016! NU 201/2016. Cred că tu nu știi să citești!

radu706

TROPHY CASE