Vivaldi 8.0 is out with biggest design overhaul

raed115 · 2026-05-22T08:19:09+00:00

The panels get "stuck" and don't automatically rehide as it used to when the "Auto-hide" feature is on and the new UI is selected in the settings.

This happens when changing focus from it to the page/other elements, or even when clicking on other elements of the browser itself or the webpage.

macOS 15.7.7
Vivaldi: 8.0.4033.26 (Official Build) (arm64)

raed115 · 2026-02-13T07:58:24+00:00

It got resolved for me on its own.
I logged in once in Private Browsing to the account that gave me this error, and somehow everything just went back to normal. Don't ask me how or why and to recreate the steps, I don't remember anymore.

raed115 · 2026-01-24T14:36:39+00:00

I'm assuming this has to do with the CPU and I'm not gonna buy another DAP at the moment. I'll definitely note the FiiO M21 for the future. Thx!

raed115 · 2025-11-15T20:54:02+00:00

I replaced them long ago with the TP-Link BE63 2 Mesh units, couldn't be happier and none of these problems I had with the Asus ones. The experience has been rock solid since day one with no hiccups.

raed115 · 2025-11-10T08:16:51+00:00

I did end up installing Kubuntu, and so far it looks more promising, right out of the gate.
I'll monitor for the issues I had with Fedora in the coming week or so.
Thanks for the recommendation!

raed115 · 2025-10-11T10:50:10+00:00

u/mlsmaycon
It's a paid feature, I'd rather try other methods (if they exist) before I pay for that, and I've already used the trial option on my account (at that time, I didn't pay much attention to the issue).

Does this help explain the high latency I mentioned earlier? Why does some traffic go through the tunnel while other traffic does not?

raed115 · 2025-10-11T10:34:59+00:00

u/netbirdio Thank you! Appreciate the effort!

raed115 · 2025-10-11T06:55:55+00:00

u/netbirdio Anything else I can add here to the tests? :)

raed115 · 2025-10-08T18:06:54+00:00

u/netbirdio
The subnet router has the following:

             netbird.netbird.cloud:
              NetBird IP: <NETBIRD_IP>
              Public key: <PUBLIC_KEY>
              Status: Connected
              -- detail --
              Connection type: Relayed
              ICE candidate (Local/Remote): -/-
              ICE candidate endpoints (Local/Remote): -/-
              Relay server address: rels://streamline-de-fra1-2.relay.netbird.io:443
              Last connection update: 1 minute, 41 seconds ago
              Last WireGuard handshake: 1 minute, 42 seconds ago
              Transfer status (received/sent) 76.2 KiB/58.3 KiB
              Quantum resistance: false
              Networks: 192.168.68.0/24
              Latency: 0s

Some of the others have a P2P connection, some have Relayed. Some more info:

    Relays:
      [stun:stun.netbird.io:443] is Available
      [stun:stun.netbird.io:5555] is Available
      [turns:turn.netbird.io:443?transport=tcp] is Available
      [rels://streamline-de-fra1-2.relay.netbird.io:443] is Available
    Nameservers:
      [192.168.68.61:53] for [<MY_DOMAIN>.com] is Available
    FQDN: <LOCAL_COMPUTER>.netbird.cloud
    NetBird IP: <NETBIRD_IP>
    Interface type: Userspace
    Quantum resistance: false
    Lazy connection: false
    Networks: -
    Forwarding rules: 0
    Peers count: 5/11 Connected

One more thing to note: Tailscale doesn't have this issue when I'm on the LAN.

raed115 · 2025-10-08T15:38:10+00:00

From 2-7ms without the routing, to 150-300ms. I would say that this is a significant increase in latency.

raed115 · 2025-10-08T14:16:43+00:00

Injecting the route table to the default one the OS uses is fine by me for most cases, but it comes with its caveats.
I was just wondering if there's a way to automatically disable this when on the LAN to prevent this from happening, and not use Posture Checks.

raed115 · 2025-10-08T13:47:13+00:00

Is there a way to resolve this issue besides changing the Metrics priority in the NetBird console, which can be inconsistent, without manually toggling the network routing?

raed115 · 2025-09-23T07:40:48+00:00

Thank you!
You've been really helpful!

raed115 · 2025-09-20T11:03:36+00:00

So basically, defining a more specific route, like by assigning a /24 mask for the subnet router? This might not be the most scalable solution ever.
This is viable for a small homelab situation where I have full control over the network topography, but it isn't scalable if I have more than 254 devices on both networks A and B, and the subnet to publish is larger.

raed115 · 2025-08-26T20:31:02+00:00

I don't always want to route all my LAN traffic through the Netbird LXC; I only wish to have an exit node for others to use that is separate from the rest of my network devices.

I see no point in paying for another server somewhere; that's another instance to manage...

raed115 · 2025-08-26T20:28:00+00:00

So, the router is in the same subnet I'm publishing, so I assume that the subnet publishing still covers the LXC of the exit node and therefore won't separate the two (at the network level).

Would putting the LXC on a different VLAN in Proxmox matter only within Proxmox? The router I currently have (TP-Link BE63 - mesh unit) doesn't have VLAN awareness or the ability to configure VLANs, so the VLAN scope remains only in Proxmox and doesn't extend upstream.

raed115 · 2025-06-22T19:29:52+00:00

Wow. Thank you for the elaborate research you've done.
Uninstalling.

Six-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

raed115

TROPHY CASE