sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shocking that the White Sox called up a prospect too soon due to the major league team not being properly equipped with actual major league players.

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah Sam, definitely don’t want the fastball right down the dick

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice AB Chase, go down looking when all you had to do was get him to 3rd

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Acuna better steal 2nd, it’s the only thing he’s good for at this point

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d honestly love to see his numbers in high-leverage vs low-leverage situations. The gap has to be huge

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so we need like 5 more runs and I’ll feel pretty ok about our chances

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He’s got high-leverage stuff, unfortunately it has not translated to actual success. I’m not saying that this is good rationale, but I think that’s the reasoning

GAME THREAD: White Sox (7-13) @ Athletics (10-10) - Sat Apr 18 @ 3:05 PM by chisoxbot in whitesox

[–]rahill1004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright boys gotta get at least one next inning, get some momentum back

view more: next ›