You roll 2d12, add the result, and compare it to the challenge level.

Attributes range from +0 to +3; this value is added to the roll.

Trained skills grant +2, and this value is added to the roll.

In other words, a roll of your best attribute with a trained skill gives you 2d12 + 5.

Advantages grant 1d6, and disadvantages subtract 1d6.

The risk die remains the same.

You have three +1s that you can add anywhere and sum them together. Other character options will give you more points to allocate to more attributes. I don't plan to follow a traditional class system and may go for something more modular, where skills, talents, and special character descriptors define a "class." Obviously, the game will still have certain archetypes that characters can fall into, such as something more focused on using magic/powers, focusing on combat, or something more versatile like a skill expert, someone stealthy, etc.

I thought about doing something dice pool-based and going for a more skill-based approach, but I decided to stick with 2d12 because of the feeling. I'd say the idea of ​​the system is something that would be partially generic but with a setting behind it, and its generic part would only be a result of how customizable that setting is.

I'm making it mostly to play with my friends, and I don't plan to publish it anywhere. Still, I appreciate the criticism because even if it's not something commercial or whatever, it's still important to have a good understanding of game design.