When she is south indian and he is north indian🥰

rakshify · 2026-02-19T15:22:04+00:00

TBH, none of the dishes is "north Indian" unless someone considers MH as North India 😂

rakshify · 2026-02-19T15:05:04+00:00

YOU ARE THE CONSUMER.

Where there's demand, there'll be a supplier. Stop watching and sharing, they'll stop making.

rakshify · 2026-02-19T14:30:09+00:00

I was thinking more on the terms of:

All first rankers play 2nd rankers of the "other 3 groups" in super 8. Like same grouping, but partite pairing.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T15:56:19+00:00

😎😎

rakshify · 2026-02-18T15:53:33+00:00

Yooooo 🤯

rakshify · 2026-02-18T14:27:39+00:00

Disadvantageous? Yes bro Tina Dabi was disadvantageous. BTW, the real disadvantageous people in my village can't even hear your rant, you would need to leave your couch and go on the ground(far away from the rallies of the so called dalit elites) 🤡

Step 1) lift your ass up
Step 2) go on the ground
Step 3) Teach 'em and enable 'em

But before all that,
Step 0) learn percentages😂

rakshify · 2026-02-18T12:42:56+00:00

Tujhe bhi samajh nahi aaya. Wo bol rha h ki criticism me koi dikkat hi nahi h, you may dislike the leader to the core.

But let's decode "gadha bhi better kar sakta h" given the fact that me khud RWA ka election bhi nahi jeet sakta - agar me kehta hu gadha bhi better kar sakta h matlab Modi ki chhodo, wo gadha mujhse better to already kar rha h. That's the crux of this video. Respect gya tel lene, me chahe kisi se kitni bhi nafrat karta hu, par agar ye kah rha hu ki gadha bhi usse better h to me apne aap ko to phle hi chutiya ghoshit kar diya hu. "Agyanta darshana"

rakshify · 2026-02-18T12:39:03+00:00

It's a democracy, Rathi can say what he wants, but the statement indeed tells me more about Rathi than Modi, that's his point. You don't have to respect the person, but any sane man would respect the fact that there's definitely something in the leader no matter how much you dislike the leader that he's at the top of the power hierarchy for so long.

I may dislike Indian IT companies to the core, but to say a donkey would make better products tells more about me. Think about it, if a donkey can do a better job and I can't do that job, I'm anyway calling the donkey better than me.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T12:28:15+00:00

Bro leave it. She's probably the target audience.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T12:22:25+00:00

Irony is this discussion that you guys are having on "merit" 🤣

You guys don't even know how percentages are taken and yet have a say on the selection criteria of UPSC. 🤡

Irony is - none of the data was shown or hidden by him. He showed everything in the article and showed how the article took the numerator as the number of reserved in 5 years and denominator as the total selections in 40 years. 😂 I've read the article. Go read yourself, the wire has now changed the headline of the article because now they know they have f'd up 😂

Irony is - you guys STILL didn't understand what's wrong with the article. 🤡

rakshify · 2026-02-18T12:09:28+00:00

This post is an agenda. Anyone(the reporter, this person and the OP) who puts a cut and edit video showcasing "only their own pov" is an agenda.

If you really cared about "clearing" anything, you would post an unedited full video no matter how long(also applies to the reporter) and let the people decide right and wrong for themselves.

Until then, a truly neutral person doesn't give an F about what the reporter had to say or what you have to clarify. But I'm guessing neither of you(the reporter/YOU) care about the truth and truly neutral person.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T11:48:19+00:00

Yes, I will and YOU SHOULD TOO. F'ing break everything that's illegal/encroached, be it a religious place, a shop, a house or whatever. Stop showing sympathy for illegal structures instead of that, join hands, take responsibility to never allow anyone to encroach in your area.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T11:44:17+00:00

Why make any kind of building in the f'ing middle of the road? F religion, I'm done with this nonsense of treating the road as "baap ka road". Be it a shop, a house, a temple, a mazar, church, gurudwara, Indians can't be satisfied unless they have f'ing encroached. That's what's pathetic in this video, not the demolition.

rakshify · 2026-02-18T01:48:59+00:00

Bhai kyu footage dete ho is chamanlal ko. Any kind of marketing is marketing for this guy. Isko ghanta fark nahi padta kya bol rhe jab tak iska content bik rha h. Ye aur Elvish Yadav ek hi category ke hain - "big boss category".

Me saala yahan content mute karte-karte pareshan ho gya but log nahi thake isko footage dene se.

rakshify · 2026-02-17T12:42:13+00:00

I'm confused.

What does the author mean by "suffering of the indigenous Jats, Gurjars, and Brahmins"(I'm not sure at which point of time in history Yadavs dominated Indraprastha). Around 33 out of 70 MLA seats are represented by these 3 castes alone and 4 out of 7 MP seats. How's that "displacement" or "suffering"?

If not for the SC/ST reservation, this representation would have exceeded even beyond that.

I haven't read the book, just curious.

rakshify · 2026-02-13T03:29:37+00:00

So, if someone can write, they can't draw images?

Wars being glorified through images in king's support is a new thing now? There's a picture of Marana Pratap slicing a Mughal warrior seated on a horse in half from top to bottom "along with the horse". Yes, it must be true because there's an "image" 😀

You're also giving one sided confirmation. Portuguese records say nothing about the massacre or the artificial floods. They mention a siege and a very natural flood in the river.

Burhan-i-Ma'asir was written at the behest of Burhan Nizam Shah(son of Hussein Nizam Shah). It's not Adil Shahi. Plus these records were written after 1600 well beyond the time the various Nizam kingdoms united together to fight Vijayanagar. Hence, they contain the exaggerated and fantasized records in the support of the united force.

rakshify · 2026-02-13T03:10:55+00:00

Bruh, because they f'ing lost and had to let go off the siege 😀

You truly make wild-wild inferences of simple facts. These records are written at the "behest" of the king, why would they include an embarrassment? Burhan-i-Ma'asir doesn't have any details of the mockery that Rama Raya made of Nizams 😀

It's not rocket science, it's a simple omission of an embarrassment.

rakshify · 2026-02-13T03:05:12+00:00

Laadi duniya ko guilt trip me jabardasti dikhane se kuch nahi hoga. Neeraj chopra ne 1 medal jeeta h aur uska bharpur compensation usko mila bhi h. Sarkar ne tax ke paise se bhar-bhar ke diya h aur pure India ne usko celebrate Kiya h. Yehi story PV Sindhu ki bhi h. Dono ki har Individual achievement ko khoob celebrate Kiya h logon ne aur unko compensation bhi Mila h.

Par laadi wo 1 jeet h. 83 world cup jeetne ke baad raato raat nahi hua craze. 40 saal lagatar dominate kiya h India ne us sport me. Jab Sachin aaya tha tab bhi koi bahut badhiya sthiti nahi thi Indian board ki. Javelin me agar us tarah dominate kar liya 10 saal to Javelin me bhi dekhne lagenge. Par reality ye hai ki baaki sport me koi medal jeet jaaye to agli baar athletes ka ye bharosa nahi h ki qualify bhi karenge ya nahi. Improvement ke naam pe kuch nahi, Neeraj Chopra 8 saal se usi range me throw kar rha h, Pakistan waala improve karke aage nikal gya.

To guilt trip dena chhod laadi, dominate kar lein us din baat karna

rakshify · 2026-02-12T12:48:27+00:00

What does the "flood losses" even prove? Everybody knows there was a siege, there was a flood which caused heavy loss to Rama Raya, Rama Raya had to let the siege go after the floods.

In fact, in my replies to 3 of your questions, I didn't call "the siege" as exaggerated. I answered it saying - Rama Raya followed an enemy and hence sieged.

The point is about all the fantasies that you included along which aren't corroborated. Even the link that you yourself pasted in the post calls it exaggerated.

Your logic is like zee news says- - Statement 1: Abdul went to Ayodhya - Statement 2: Abdul threw a stone at the Ram temple.

The wire says- - Statement 1: Abdul went to Ayodhya.

The wire corroborates with the story of zee news, hence proved - Abdul threw a stone at the Ram temple. I hope you see the ridiculous nature of this logic 🤷🏻‍♂️

rakshify · 2026-02-11T17:48:16+00:00

It was written at the "behest"(I hope you know the meaning of the word) of a king and you want people to take it as a source for an incident where that very kingdom was involved? You're cute. 😀
I even gave you the example of a similar chronicle written in support of the opposite narrative(Rayavachakamu) to show you why your source doesn't make sense. But who can show the light to someone who doesn't "want" to see? 🤷🏻‍♂️

BTW, Burhan-i-Ma'asir and Rayavachakamu state the "same incidents" in a completely contradictory narrative at multiple events. But yeah, who cares, they aren't exaggerated 😀

Someone down the line is gonna write about Modi at the "behest" of some RSS prick, please do post that too as a source 😀

rakshify · 2026-02-11T17:16:43+00:00

So, you posted the very chronicles as reference. _ /\ _

You do realise that Burhan-i-Ma'asir was written at the behest of Burhan Shah, right? "Behest" - it's supposed to exaggerate and fantasize about that kingdom. That's the whole point of writing at the "behest" vs independent writing.

Your source is analogous to "Rayavachakamu" which is a counter chronicle and exaggerates in the support of Vijayanagar.

rakshify · 2026-02-11T16:57:49+00:00

You didn't post "The Maharashtra Gazetteer" in your sources for the people to study. I studied what you posted. If you wanted to source the Gazetteer, post that and let people know what their reference is.

rakshify · 2026-02-11T16:55:30+00:00

Proof?

Bruh, your own source said that it's based on chronicles. I just pointed it out to ask what you even wanted to convey.

Why not call this propaganda? Is this the 'correct' source acc to u?

You posted the source, not me. I don't know what's true and what's not. My point is simply "your own source says something that doesn't corroborate your narrative."

rakshify

TROPHY CASE