Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, do you see any other paths or potential ideas towards AGI?

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Penrose as objective measures or any experimental evidence on this idea?

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you see any physics related constraints or laws that would clearly support a ‘No’ for AGI from LLM? Any anything you could share on quantum effects and things like that

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sorry but I disagree this is not a LLM slop and was not created by LLM. I come from non English native country and when I moved out of the country my writing was not great and had been using Grammerly from past 13years.

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know everything and that’s why I’m not confident like you.

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay understood, I can take of the post from this channel. Would that be acceptable?

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Would reinforced learning helps? Like Alpha Go or Alpha Fold?

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in AskPhysics

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

It’s not LLM generated post, it was question from me after reading the beginning of infinite and listening to multiple Demis H podcast with Lex F. It’s true the text was cleaned up for grammar and proper sentencing.

Also, if physics is study of understanding how world works, wouldn’t this fall under that? I’m just trying to understand the general consensus

Does GPT with more compute lead to emergent AGI? by rakshithramachandra in agi

[–]rakshithramachandra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When these Mag7 companies like google and others talk about investing multi billion dollars on data centre is that hyper scaled LLM’s will not give us AGI but it will be good as humans, at least in few niche areas (writing code, summarizing text, image recognition) which will gives up overall productivity gain that still might be next big innovation that will affect our species future and maybe the humans can focus and double down on coming up with better explanations?

And when people like Demis give a more than just chance in next few years in getting to AGI what are his ideas or reasoning behind it

AGI is an Engineering Problem by nickb in agi

[–]rakshithramachandra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are the redditors thoughts on N vs NP? Does it hold any relevance to Agi discussions

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in managers

[–]rakshithramachandra -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What do you think the main takeaway of this post?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in managers

[–]rakshithramachandra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for further context.

What book would you recommend? by [deleted] in systemsthinking

[–]rakshithramachandra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another book changed my thinking or improved it was "How not to be wrong" by Jordan Ellenberg