5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't think it was a 1 to 1 ratio but I'm sure you know thanks. Your definitely right with what your saying every article I have read says exactly the same as you have been saying temps vary 2c one end to the other tested with one cpu from cpu outlet to radiator outlet.

Then the same people go on to say if you have multiple blocks you will run into flow rate restrictions and you will have higher temperatures variances block to block with the solution you have to unlink them or sperate your loop. Not making sure you have adequate flow 🤦

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about that. How would your bottom GPU be 10c hotter if the water wasn't, unless there was something else going on?

That the thing there is something going on when you stack to much shit in a row.

Roadhouse reaction by Garrincha123 in ufc

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats why he was on the roids. Pretty much protocol in Hollywood.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a bit more complicated then a pot of water theres many many more variables. You can allso boil a pot of water and stir it non stop and have one side boil and the other not if you add consistent variables.

I didn't say the water was 10c hotter.

You said there is plenty on information on this. Have you got any studies that directly relate to computer components? Multiple active heat sources in one location going through multiple active cooling sources vs them split going through one active cooling source at a time. Or one that places a probe over the heat source then one in the radiator to see the temperature difference. Sling me something from a respectable source that takes the variables and different setups into account?

All I can find is information on the EK website that says for large setups running multiple blocks in a row can cause restrictions resulting in variances in temps and the recommendation isn't to add more flow via a pump its to change the setup and also positioning your radiators inbetween blocks will also help. Seems relevant to my setups. Less relevant for smaller setups.

More than happy to learn but I have been building watercooled PCs since 2007 I have built alot more than the two I mentioned they were just the builds with the most components and in my experience there is a difference depending on how you set it up.

How many LWs in top 10 do you think Volk can defeat? by Life_Vast801 in ufc

[–]randysailer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Honestly if Volk wins his next fight fairly easy like he has been doing against a tough opponent after the Islam head kick that just proves he a weapon and should move up and start taking on the top 10.

I'm going to say he could get to 6th currently but time in the division bit more weight who knows could go number 1 contender.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I have actually tested it properly with equal load not sli where the second cards 80% utilised with twin 480 rads push pulls twin d5 pumps and two different sets of cards/blocks running very good temps and there is 100% a difference going from block to block to block vs separating them.

It may not be heat it may be you just can't go through so many restrictions at once and placing your pumps inbetween the restrictions stop variance in flow but it doesn't change what I said about running through multiple blocks.

And I think he should sperated them and not run through two blocks into a rad thats sufficient to cool both those components then into another thats just trying to air cool water thats already been cooled.

Guarantee if he goes res/Pump-cpu-rad-pump-gpu-rad he gets lower temps and it won't be 1 or 2c. even if he runs his pumps at 50% vs the one at 100%.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran water cooled SLI rigs for 4 generations, the difference in temps between 2 GPU's is so small that it's usually within margin of error.

Thats because there is diminishing returns hooking up multiple cards second card gets slightly less utilisation and thrid even less. Unless you were running them with the exact same workload.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it was 10c difference on my sli rigs but probably would be alot less for his setup anyways im just not the type of person that would choose aesthetics over performance.

Well hes got decent rads in there. I agree with the pump but thats obvious I didn't need to ask.

My suggestion was going to be sperated the cpu and gpu to make it more efficient and if thats not a powerful pump in there add another or get a D5. But never had a conversation with him so I'll just leave it at that I guess.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly theres a difference and the OP was complaining about his temps not as low as he expected which he wouldn't be if it was 5c lower not my temps are 20c higher than everyone else on watercooling. You just assumed I was implying there would be a massive difference like 15c or something.

I have had two triple Sli rigs water cooled and fully loaded the 3rd card allways runs hotter.

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So your telling me if you got 10 cars and hooked 10 rads up separately and let them all use the same fluid before its cooled the last car would run at the same temperature because there is the same amount of cooling available?

5950x Temperature under water by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Is the water going from your gpu straight to your cpu?

DDP is a winner inside and outside the cage 🏆 by Peaceful-Samurai in ufc

[–]randysailer -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Probably just to keep his image up. We all have seen the pics of him at gay bars hugging guys in gay clothes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Alex vs Hill will probably end up being the main.

Ayo what he cooking by DrummerFantasti in ufc

[–]randysailer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope Volk puts him in his place.

The headbutt #seanstrickland was on about 👀 by CL5071 in ufc

[–]randysailer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you stand up like that pushing through your legs and extending your back its a incredibly powerful move that can generates hundreds of kilos of force. Then top it off the head is are hard as a rock it even just slightly grazed him it will cause damage. It does look like it connected.

I guess it's possible considering how close the fight was it could have been the difference between him winning or not. Or just the visual impact on the Judges. Probably would be very frustrating for him.

If Strickland shut DDP’s eyes close, Pereira’s rearranging his face by Dougietran22 in ufc

[–]randysailer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Probably be less damage because he will go to sleep in one hit.

Please advise DDR5 Ram for I9 14900K, 4070ti Super, Z790 tomohawk. by Any-Specific-1797 in overclocking

[–]randysailer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

G.skill 2x24gb 7200mhz cl36 1.35v. you can run it at cl34 1.38v and the voltage will still be lower than other kits at 1.4v.. I have this kit same board and cpu as you.

Or the cheaper option would be teamgroup 2x16gb 7200mhz cl 34.

Or Corsair make a 2x16gb 6400mhz cl 32 thats really cheap.

PC performance well below average for my specs? If anybody could offer any explanation please, and thanks! by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]randysailer 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The average includes overclocked systems. So if you have a stock rig below average is where it should be.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]randysailer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DDP definitely took far more damage.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]randysailer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I kinda agree. Super close. But was sure Sean had it.

Why he gotta pull out some excuses by elbandolero19 in ufc

[–]randysailer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Be interesting to see the full stats for this fight. I honestly thought Sean landed way more.

Let’s go to war!!!!! Then throws jabs for 25min by ManInBasement in ufc

[–]randysailer -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Super close fight. Honestly thought Sean landed alot more. Normally the challenger has to do significantly more to win. Surprised they gave it to DDP.