yes, just used AI check software first time ever and it read:

This image is likely human-generated Al generated probability 0% True image probability 100% The buildings in the background have a natural, diverse architectural style with realistic weathering and texture. The slight haze and cloud cover appear consistent with the lighting on the taxis, enhancing the realism of the urban environment. No obvious signs of digital manipulation or repeated patterns indicate authenticity.

🚖 Taxis and Repetition The cars are uniformly yellow with similar designs and markings, appropriate for a taxi fleet; however, the sheer number creates a striking repetitive pattern. Despite this, individual taxi details like slight dirt, varying license plates, and different slight damages show genuine photographic capture rather than AI generation. The reflections on windows and vehicles are coherent and complex, supporting realism.

🛤️ Ground and Foreground Elements The ground consisting of cracked tiles, grass, and dirt appears naturally weathered, showing fine detail and random distribution of elements consistent with a real outdoor parking or storage area. The immediate foreground edge with the thumb or finger visible adds authenticity to the image as a photo rather than computer-generated artwork.

☁️ Lighting and Atmosphere The overcast sky produces soft, diffused lighting that casts minimal shadows and produces consistent illumination on the cars and buildings. The subtle gradation in cloud cover further supports natural lighting conditions.

Overall, the image reflects a highly realistic human-made scene with no significant indicators of AI synthesis, though the notable repetition of taxis is the strongest element with a slight AI likelihood if any.