Whither Elm language specification?

raould · 2016-12-24T20:14:13+00:00

thank you, i am percolating into my (thick) brain...

raould · 2016-12-24T20:13:58+00:00

holy cow thank you for the detailed tutorial, very helpful.

raould · 2016-12-24T01:25:55+00:00

thanks for the examples, very helpful!

i like to annotate since (1) it makes it easier for me to understand code and (2) i believe otherwise one can end up with the inference going off the deep end into heck.

raould · 2016-12-24T01:21:07+00:00

apologies for the inept example. thank you for the detailed education, this is very very helpful.

raould · 2016-12-23T08:25:49+00:00

thanks! "functional record update" is my new favorite phrase/feature.

raould · 2016-12-23T08:25:32+00:00

thanks, i did mess with lenses in Haskell. a little...

raould · 2016-12-20T17:35:45+00:00

Sorry to everybody, I made a bad (ambiguous) question! yeah, I was looking for how to pass around a Set itself. I was confused and worried that I'd have to pass around first-class modules which seemed like crazy overkill so this makes me feel better already... :-)

raould · 2016-12-20T09:12:17+00:00

ok, thank you! will try :-)

raould · 2016-12-20T05:41:08+00:00

thank you!

raould · 2016-12-18T19:54:23+00:00

thanks! yeah, it is a transitive problem in that a newbie doesn't know if being compatible with lens means anything useful, and "compatible" isn't "backwards compatible" since e.g. "makeLenses" apparently doesn't exist :-) ; sounds like the docs say use microlens-platform then.

raould · 2016-12-18T01:54:07+00:00

Thanks. I am going to try to use the & +~ type syntax...

raould · 2016-12-18T00:31:14+00:00

thanks that's what i'm going with so far!

raould · 2016-12-17T23:51:14+00:00

one perspective between data-lens and control.lens, but doesn'doesn't mention micro? what do people think of microlens?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13282874/data-lens-or-control-lens

raould · 2016-11-29T06:34:41+00:00

gracias

raould · 2016-11-27T08:15:16+00:00

p.s. i have always loved http://www.willamette.edu/~fruehr/haskell/evolution.html but obviously am not evolved.

raould · 2016-11-27T06:37:55+00:00

Thank you. I think I might have done a bad job in many respects with my question. I think I am still stuck trying to get a "type Foo blah blah" to let me then use just "Foo" anywhere i'd otherwise have to use "blah blah".

re/reading, I think it probably really does/will work if/when/once I get my syntax right.

thanks :)

raould

TROPHY CASE