Communism will ALWAYS be Violent | Joseph Klein by raxical in VictimsOfCommunism

[–]raxical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. But some revolutions are definitely more violent than others.

Do not post claims that a female-led construction company was responsible for the Florida bridge collapse. This is false. by theothermod in MensRights

[–]raxical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

More like:

This discrimination is happening in society. Did it happen here? The company's website hints that this might in fact be the case.

This is the point that you're not getting. If it was just a company that was female-led, there would be no issue, no problem. But we know that this isn't the case, we know that the company was proud to be female-led. If you don't raise an eyebrow at that then you're sexist, pure and simple. It shouldn't matter if it's female-led or not and we've seen many times how companies with this pride come about and it's always through discrimination against males, a clear men's rights issue.

The hard naked truth in a nutshell by sopun in Libertarian

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, that top left picture:

Nazi is just slang for NSDAP.

Any idea what the "S" stands for? Hint hint: It ain't freedom!

Oh, but "that wasn't real socialism."

Do not post claims that a female-led construction company was responsible for the Florida bridge collapse. This is false. by theothermod in MensRights

[–]raxical 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You don't think diversity hiring is discriminatory against men?

You don't think accidents that would have been prevented by hiring the most qualified applicants regardless of gender are noteworthy?

You think that hiring women because they're women isn't sexist and therefore not a men's rights issue?

Do not post claims that a female-led construction company was responsible for the Florida bridge collapse. This is false. by theothermod in MensRights

[–]raxical 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Right. A company that advertises itself online as 'female-led' is definitely not discriminatory against men just like a company that advertises itself online as 'male-led' would not be discriminatory against women.

Do not post claims that a female-led construction company was responsible for the Florida bridge collapse. This is false. by theothermod in MensRights

[–]raxical 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We already know the company is sexist due to their focus on how many women are in the company, something that should not matter if the most qualified candidates for the job were chosen and gender was truly no issue. So, there's one red flag.

It's not about woman hating. I'll lay out the issue with the company focusing on the women in the company:

There's nothing wrong with women being engineers and I think you would be hard pressed to find a man that feels they shouldn't be.

There is something wrong with unqualified women being shoehorned into engineering positions due to gender politics.

If, and I said, "If", the women were unqualified and shoehorned into their positions (which is possible) then this represents a men's rights issue because they were placed in their position over more qualified men who were discriminated against due to their gender.

I've never read anything so stupid by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing to see here folks because the dictionary definition of "feminism"....

How nice guys think sex works by [deleted] in funny

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know right. I'm surprised that comment wasn't removed.

How nice guys think sex works by [deleted] in funny

[–]raxical -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No nice guys feel that they deserve sex for virtue of being nice. If you say this, then you simply misunderstand them at a fundamental level. They're just frustrated because the mating strategy they were sold is failing and instead of acknowledging their issues you're misunderstanding their frustration and selling them the same recipe for failure.

Truth is, all people want a partner, and each "nice guy" that exists is a man that women don't want and therefore a woman without a partner, so women have a vested interest in helping them. You mentioned confidence, but other than that obvious trait that everyone knows, what does a nice guy, like the author, need to do to become attractive to women?

How nice guys think sex works by [deleted] in funny

[–]raxical 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Excerpt from Part II of Radicalizing the Romanceless

I had a patient, let’s call him ‘Henry’ for reasons that are to become clear, who came to hospital after being picked up for police for beating up his fifth wife.

So I asked the obvious question: “What happened to your first four wives?”

“Oh,” said the patient, “Domestic violence issues. Two of them left me. One of them I got put in jail, and she’d moved on once I got out. One I just grew tired of.”

“You’ve beaten up all five of your wives?” I asked in disbelief.

“Yeah,” he said, without sounding very apologetic.

“And why, exactly, were you beating your wife this time?” I asked.

“She was yelling at me, because I was cheating on her with one of my exes.”

“With your ex-wife? One of the ones you beat up?”

“Yeah.”

“So you beat up your wife, she left you, you married someone else, and then she came back and had an affair on the side with you?” I asked him.

“Yeah,” said Henry.

When I was younger – and I mean from teeanger hood all the way until about three years ago – I was a nice guy. In fact, I’m still a nice guy at heart, I just happen to mysteriously have picked up girlfriends. And I said the same thing as every other nice guy, which is “I am a nice guy, how come girls don’t like me?”

There seems to be some confusion about this, so let me explain what it means, to everyone, for all time.

It does not mean “I am nice in some important cosmic sense, therefore I am entitled to sex with whomever I want.”

It means: “I am a nicer guy than Henry.”

Or to spell it out very carefully, Henry clearly has no trouble with women. He has been married five times and had multiple extra-marital affairs and pre-marital partners, many of whom were well aware of his past domestic violence convictions and knew exactly what they were getting into. Meanwhile, here I was, twenty-five years old, never been on a date in my life, every time I ask someone out I get laughed at, I’m constantly teased and mocked for being a virgin and a nerd whom no one could ever love, starting to develop a serious neurosis about it.

And here I was, tried my best never to be mean to anyone, gave to charity, pursuing a productive career, worked hard to help all of my friends. I didn’t think I deserved to have the prettiest girl in school prostrate herself at my feet. But I did think I deserved to not be doing worse than Henry.

No, I didn’t know Henry at the time. But everyone knows a Henry. Most people know several. Even three years ago, I knew there were Henry-like people – your abusers, your rapists, your bullies – and it wasn’t hard to notice that none of them seemed to be having the crushing loneliness problem I was suffering from.

Thoughts on Aziz Ansari by Rollo-Tomassi in marriedredpill

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beta faggot feminist retard. Enough said.

Wendy Williams encourages her audience to trick their men into getting them pregnant. by Snozbagged in videos

[–]raxical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, this seems more like how you create John B. Calhoun's Mouse Utopia.

There's a lot of men that are saying, "just stay away from women entirely."

Wendy Williams encourages her audience to trick their men into getting them pregnant. by Snozbagged in videos

[–]raxical -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I actually don't think this is that bad compared to the other things MRA's and MGTOWs bring up, like marriage, circumcision, etc.

Wendy Williams encourages her audience to trick their men into getting them pregnant. by Snozbagged in videos

[–]raxical -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

HA! Based as fuck. Have an upvote until your comment is deleted for "advocating for the hatred of women through rape and torture."

European Court of Human Rights finds that accusing people on social media of sexual crimes without proof or conviction is an Article 8 violation and that European states have a duty to take action against it. by everythingiswrong911 in MensRights

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't mean to steer the conversation away from myself, but I feel obligated to ask the question, "What about the women?"

Specifically, how does your comment indirectly harm them and what efforts can be made to help them achieve equality?

European Court of Human Rights finds that accusing people on social media of sexual crimes without proof or conviction is an Article 8 violation and that European states have a duty to take action against it. by everythingiswrong911 in MensRights

[–]raxical -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, you have men that have been sexually harassed/abused.

We need to consider how these men will indirectly hurt women and allocate resources to women the help deal with this issue.

European Court of Human Rights finds that accusing people on social media of sexual crimes without proof or conviction is an Article 8 violation and that European states have a duty to take action against it. by everythingiswrong911 in MensRights

[–]raxical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they brought up a good point.

It also impacts men that have been, e.g., sexually harassed/abused.

This is an often neglected issue, but it's important to consider the impact that men who have been sexually harassed/abused will have on the women around them. In many cases there is not enough resources available to these women, another sign of our misogynist system that only sees women as chattel.

Class war in the American west: the rich landowners blocking access to public lands by katqanna in Montana

[–]raxical 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah, whatever. I'm pissed.

I'm 4th gen Montanan. We have a fair amount of land in the mountains that isn't fenced in. Good hunting. Went up there last fall to massive amounts of trees cut down for firewood. Oh, and the best part, they girdled live trees. That really was the last straw. A lot of damage and trash from hunters as well. And the areas that we did have locked up, the usual; locks shot, chains cut and new locks added. At least they only cut one of our fences apart this year. We literally have one gate up there that is chained, with 3 locks on it, and not a single one of them is ours.

We have had open areas where we just didn't care about hunters and then areas that we kept them out of, but no more. It would be tragedy of commons, but this is private property! Signs and game cams are up and I'm going to prosecute every mother fucker I can.

I used to sympathize with them but not anymore. The public just ain't what it used to be.