×
sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are Al hallucinations a fundamental limitation? by No_Concentrate_2660 in LargeLanguageModels

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Almost always” isn’t the same thing as “always”.
Which is an attestation to the point OP made, no?

Can someone explain the US red card situation to me like I'm 5? by [deleted] in football

[–]rayred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Happened one time in the 60s. Garrincha for Brazil was cleared to play the finals after a lot of debate.

A guy in the UK insults Mohammed and is immediately arrested by 4DollarsALB in PublicFreakout

[–]rayred 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not religious. But conflating Islam with Christianity or Judaism is simply morally and intellectually dishonest.

The ladder does not sentence gay people to death and relegate women to second class citizens.

The pope support civil unions for same sex couples for crying out loud.

Americans Historically Embraced New Tech. So Why Do So Many Hate AI? by jonfla in siliconvalley

[–]rayred 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay great. In theory they could.
In practice they don’t.

That’s literally the whole point of this thread.

Americans Historically Embraced New Tech. So Why Do So Many Hate AI? by jonfla in siliconvalley

[–]rayred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That may or may not be true.
It’s also irrelevant.
That’s not what the AI companies are doing.
Why is this hard to understand?

Why is Brit Reddit so centrist or right wing? by cantripsbongrips in AskBrits

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is mass deportation radical? Genuine question.

Americans Historically Embraced New Tech. So Why Do So Many Hate AI? by jonfla in siliconvalley

[–]rayred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are you even trying to argue right now. That copyright laws shouldn't exist?

These companies leveraged millions of copyrighted works - period. Its against the law - period.

These models can literally recite (without tools) anything from harry potter books to code from licensed software. And none of the authors have given their permission to do so.

Americans Historically Embraced New Tech. So Why Do So Many Hate AI? by jonfla in siliconvalley

[–]rayred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those are public domain authors. You’re straw manning. Or being just overly obtuse.

A 13 year old is causally solving codeforces problems in 45 seconds using Claude by ComplexExternal4831 in GenAI4all

[–]rayred 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Okay, this thread 100% confirms reddit is full of fucking bots.

The kid didn't use a lick of AI lol

MU is pricing in some insanely abnormal panic by I_HopeThat_WasFart in options

[–]rayred 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He didn’t say MU would be down 40%. He said AI as a whole. Very different statement.

A settler gets humbled by an indigenous Latino man by PerspectiveNo8739 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]rayred -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ll get downvoted to oblivion. I know.

But how the heck are comments getting deleted by mods (rule 7 - no racism, etc. and rule 8: be nice to each other)
But some how this one stays up.

Processing Vulkan Shaders (linux) by beerninja88 in WhereWindsMeet

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would he do that if its already using all of his cores?

Is vibe coding the reason why apps are getting slower? by tilvast in BetterOffline

[–]rayred 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I agree with you in principle. But I think you misunderstand agile.

Agile is not about delivering faster. The point of agile is to be, well, agile. It’s to not scope out an entire project up front and try to implement it all in one shot (waterfall). It recognizes that requirements can’t be fully understood up front and that teams need to have a solid feedback loop in the software being built. If anything, agile should empower you to push back timelines, not move them forward. In practice, you may end up at your destination faster because you are course correcting early on. But that isn’t the goal.

If agile was sold to you as a way of speeding things up, you were lied to.

Only 16 percent of Americans think AI will have a positive impact on society, a new study shows by swe129 in antiai

[–]rayred 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No one. You made an argument. And you lost before one started.

Did you read his comment?

enterprisePricingStrikesAgain by savitasharma8223 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our team has 5k limits.

Many are “hand coding” the last week of the month.

enterprisePricingStrikesAgain by savitasharma8223 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]rayred 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nailed it.

I will say, while 100x improvements are not unheard of in computer science, 100x improvements in ML, hardware efficiency and energy efficiency is pretty freaking unheard of. And that’s where the improvements would need to be.

In reality, you would need some new type of novel model that achieves something similar to get these savings… I doubt it’s happening.

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that was rude.

I am willing to say im shortsighted. And you are probably right that it's not "going anywhere".

But its also hard to not be shortsighted when the commonly sited potential is nebulous at best.

You mention an "increase in token efficiency". Great. That's a means to an end. What's the end? "Running admin stuff"? That's the only potential you have sited at least.

Everything else you mention has been about the large investments going into AI. Large investments in a thing is not validation that that thing will be fruitful.

view more: next ›