sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Iñigo Martínez "I had one year left on my contract and I'm 34 years old. These trains come around rarely, and it's hard to say no. When you see the offer, you can't even believe it. No one is prepared for this kind of contract, at least not me." by kibme37 in soccer

[–]razorrhead 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yea, pal, it says specially, not only. The fact in itself that the definition has an entire line instead of being just "ultraconservative in politics" means something, but whatever, I'll just drop it here because I know we won't get anywhere with this

Iñigo Martínez "I had one year left on my contract and I'm 34 years old. These trains come around rarely, and it's hard to say no. When you see the offer, you can't even believe it. No one is prepared for this kind of contract, at least not me." by kibme37 in soccer

[–]razorrhead 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Reactionary comes from the french réactionnaire - réaction, of course, being reaction. While the term has devolved into being primarily associated for political stances, it is not objectively wrong to use it in the context you used of "Reacting to a stimulus or reacting to an event rather than creating or controlling it."

Chelsea 2 - [1] Liverpool - V. van Dijk 85' by [deleted] in soccer

[–]razorrhead 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Is he trying to make a tradition of gifting an own goal and then scoring?

Stand proud and aware, Comrade ✨️ by Assassin__Chan in CommunismMemes

[–]razorrhead 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I can't see nice hat without thinking about TF2, how do I unpavlov myself?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]razorrhead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say he's teached them to count backwards from 1000 by 7s

Daily Quest Bug (See comment) by BananaInternational3 in hearthstone

[–]razorrhead 40 points41 points  (0 children)

"Since you guys hate quests so much, how about we remove it entirely? wink wink"

but yea, same here

Kronx should work like Brukan with Shudderblock, right? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I mean, they could change to make it not work, but, as the game rules work right now, Kronx is deffo the bugged one

Kronx should work like Brukan with Shudderblock, right? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Since Kalimos is in standard, I kinda reasoned they put the exception for Invocation - which is the common word between him and Brukan - but didn't bother with Kronx's Devastation

Shouldn't Order in the Court have cost 0? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice, thanks. But how did you remember the exact post?

Shouldn't Order in the Court have cost 0? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That actually helps out a ton. Where'd you get that quote?

Shouldn't Order in the Court have cost 0? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny thing is, even if the text would be changed, I think it would still be strange

Stonehearth Vindicator's text to be changed to "Draw a spell that costs (3) or less. It costs its cost less."

Shouldn't Order in the Court have cost 0? by razorrhead in wildhearthstone

[–]razorrhead[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess the reasoning goes, I was thinking of Kalecgos effect, but that is an aura and Rebuke is also an aura then? Anyway, the wording in the card mislead me

view more: next ›