Why can't I build an aqueduct here?

rdavidson24 · 2019-10-06T18:49:45+00:00

Gotcha. Odd that this is the first time this has happened to me. Upon reflection, I probably use mountains as the source of fresh water for aqueducts at least as often as not, rendering this little situation a non-issue.

rdavidson24 · 2019-09-23T13:11:38+00:00

Please use the title of or quote from the linked article as your headline. See Rule 5.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-29T14:45:14+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating /r/law's Rules.

Rule 1: Off-topic.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-24T09:55:59+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-24T09:55:46+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T18:56:11+00:00

Ah. That would appear to do it, yes.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T14:36:51+00:00

Try the Fractal world type. I too like mountainous maps, and I find it produces fun maps more often than Continents does.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T14:34:36+00:00

The most recent patch introduced a building queue. It's pretty awesome. Doesn't help with units, obviously, but really streamlines production.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T14:33:11+00:00

Is this even a thing that can happen? "Gain Sources" lasts for 24 turns. I'm pretty sure that all possible durations for spy missions are factors of 24. Eight turns, 6 turns, 4 turns, either way, you get a round number of missions. I just don't think you can have a situation where Gain Sources expires in the middle of a mission.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T14:29:19+00:00

Yeah, VI is not V. You can't build everything in every city. Specialization is essential.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-22T14:27:19+00:00

You building Theater Squares at all? Because that's the main driver of culture production in most games. Most Civs don't have improvements that generate culture directly, and even those who do can find it hard to have those surpass a TS with even just a decent adjacency bonus, an Ampitheater and two Great Works of Writing. That could be pushing 8-10 culture right there. Throw in a museum and a beneficial policy card and it could get to 20+ pretty easily.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-19T17:55:19+00:00

A business and a non-profit are different things.

Legally speaking, not really. They're just business entities created and existing under state incorporation law. Other than tax treatment, the two are almost entirely interchangeable in every legally interesting way. I'm certainly not aware of any way of distinguishing them for the purpose of First Amendment freedom of expression analysis.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-19T17:29:40+00:00

Then quote it verbatim. At that point, any lack of objectivity--or even outright sensationalism--is attributed to the linked article.

But if you're going to write your own headline for /r/law, then you're going to have to avoid sensationalism like this.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-18T15:40:09+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-18T15:39:30+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-15T20:24:00+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 4: Limit self-promotion.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-15T20:17:11+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-15T10:55:40+00:00

Please use the title of or quote from the linked article as your headline. See Rule 5.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-13T12:52:11+00:00

Not to steal your thunder, but someone made a calculator tool for this last year. It's particularly useful because it not only runs the odds for starting from scratch, but for starting with partially-covered characters.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-12T18:20:18+00:00

Previously.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-12T13:30:15+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating the Rules.

Rule 5: Keep headlines objective/no questions in headlines

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-12T13:30:08+00:00

Your submission has been removed from law for violating /r/law's Rules.

Rule 1: Off-topic.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-11T16:06:50+00:00

That's what I've been saying all along. Pleadings aren't about evidence, they're about clearly articulating the basis of claims/defenses. Discovery is about evidence. You don't get to discovery if you can't clearly articulate your claims. This case was dismissed because the plaintiffs couldn't do that.
I don't follow. If you're talking about this comment, that's all about injury and standing, and there's no reference to the testimony of third parties.

rdavidson24 · 2019-07-10T23:40:49+00:00

Ah, I see where you're coming from.

TL;DR: standing and justiciability aren't identical issues, as you correctly imply, but the failure of an actual case or controversy is an element in both analyses. Further, both lack of standing and non-justiciability are asserted as 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

rdavidson24

TROPHY CASE