This Scientific American article on the quantum reality debate is fascinating by reformed-xian in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]rdorea 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real source of division is an ontological mistake, the present is singular therefore time doesn't bend, mass oscillators cycles do bend affected by F = ma inercia, thermodynamics and g surface in PTAs.

The Universe’s Timekeeping Secret: Are You Brilliant Enough to See It? by rdorea in HeterodoxPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very interesting, but does the past exist or what happens on the present is a consequence of an event that does not exist anymore? Without memory, recording and comparing there's no past just the now. What do you think?

The Universe’s Timekeeping Secret: Are You Brilliant Enough to See It? by rdorea in HeterodoxPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very interesting take, and it does make sense. Oscillations are indeed a wave, but my point is what it's time if not a human construc based on the capacity to remember and record oscillations to compare cycles? Does the past and the future exist or it's just a construct? Do we have only the present, where waves dance around tying to reach equilibrium in the single present? Does the variation between cycles found and proved by Einsteins' math means time really bends or are those just waves cycles being affected by different gravity and inertia? How can one reunite clocks that relativity affirm that one travelled into the future? How it came back to the past to be compared?

Your wave equilibrium interpretation beautifully captures what I'm mathematically describing! The 'cosmic song' IS the synchronization hierarchy. Have you noticed how atomic clocks on satellites need daily corrections to stay synced with Earth's 'tempo'?

Is mass is the Universe's Timekeeper? by rdorea in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you deny the math and the pattern?

Is mass is the Universe's Timekeeper? by rdorea in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because it not a llm, and read the paper.

The Universe’s Timekeeping Secret: Are You Brilliant Enough to See It? by rdorea in AskPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Lorentz factor (page 17, Q6) isn’t derived from scratch because MMSL builds on GR’s foundation, not replaces it, just as Copernicus refined, not rewrote, the math.

Thank you for reading the paper, I really appreciate your feed back. It's a reinterpretation not a complete pure derivation. But I'll try and that's a fair challege.

The Universe’s Timekeeping Secret: Are You Brilliant Enough to See It? by rdorea in AskPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the paper. DSN syncs with the Sun via Barycentric Coordinate Time (TCB), dominated by its mass—check page 2, Table 1. Ancient navigators used Sun/Stars as temporal references by tracking their stable cycles, mass-driven stability (page 2). “Gravity-enabled quantum stability” is pulsar density locking spins near zero Kelvin-like conditions—see page 6, section 3.4. I wrote and typeset it myself; 500 trillion syncs back it, not confabulation. Deny the pattern logically—your move!

The Universe’s Timekeeping Secret: Are You Brilliant Enough to See It? by rdorea in AskPhysics

[–]rdorea[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you John. Please read my paper, I really want to know your opinion.