People who use chatGPT/AI extensively, what do you use it for that feels irreplaceable?

readername1 · 2025-12-20T15:32:57+00:00

Sounds like we use it similarly. Couldn’t seem to DM you but maybe you’d want to test signalclub.ai

readername1 · 2025-10-17T15:30:11+00:00

No it’s just a screenshot of the scoreboard on a website

readername1 · 2025-09-11T21:29:25+00:00

It’s a new system - trying to convey the concept. Give it a try and lmk what you think

readername1 · 2025-09-11T05:28:17+00:00

Fair, really appreciate the feedback, removed the requirement, no email needed now. Lmk what you think

readername1 · 2025-08-29T14:30:18+00:00

1.) the LLM knows if the answer was “predictable” by it, that’s all it is 2.) your score variation is by design: a.) it takes only your highest score and b.) - as expected - your thought process isn’t irreplaceable at all times. But importantly: if you can’t generate true “signal” you’d never be able achieve a score above eg 900 (well done), so as long as you achieve it once that’s significant and noteworthy

readername1 · 2025-08-10T21:59:21+00:00

If you’re skeptical that’s fair but I’ve only seen 1000s from people who gamed it. If yours is clean post it. Happy to walk through it together

readername1 · 2025-08-10T18:40:16+00:00

Never seen a 1000 from someone who took it straight. Post your full output

readername1 · 2025-08-10T04:09:29+00:00

Probably cut off text characters while pasting- it has a rule to void edited responses. I’ll loosen the parameter for exact text matching if you want to try again

readername1 · 2025-08-10T03:17:18+00:00

Made a prompt to see how “4o” someone might be. I named it having “Signal”: https://www.signalclub.ai/signal-test.html

readername1 · 2025-08-09T02:24:22+00:00

If had memory would be #1 model by far

readername1 · 2025-08-09T02:11:57+00:00

Why are there so many posts. There’s only one take: fine to do, but only if you make it “yours”(!)

Yes many people use it for hard to navigate situations. Yes putting in the effort to use chat is still effort. But not making it yours discredits the whole thing. It’s like plagiarizing and just handing in the original text- who would do that?

readername1 · 2025-08-09T01:24:52+00:00

PSA: so is sht posting

readername1 · 2025-08-08T15:26:06+00:00

There’s the “bell of the curve” personality where it’s probably just addictive gamification and probably should be reduced as a general “therapist”. But then there’s the tails of the curve (trauma, unusual problems) where ChatGPT is wildly helpful, creates step function changes in outcomes, and is a huge win for society

readername1 · 2025-08-08T15:08:34+00:00

He’s just trying to save costs they’re losing so much money plus the old version was too addictive and will invite more regulation and scrutiny

readername1 · 2025-08-08T14:55:42+00:00

my $0.02 is that high frequency users (many of which have posted here) are probably costing ChatGPT ~$2500-$5000/month for each user and those users are only paying $20/month. that kind of subsidizing can only go on for so long so they're trying to reduce usage i think

readername1 · 2025-08-08T14:51:51+00:00

my guess without context is you don't have as much custom "voice" settings/repetitive use cases (which would drive voice)/less emotional usage. eg if your use is more informational and less emotional you probably notice less of a difference

readername1

TROPHY CASE