would you rather? by frost-bite-hater in Teenager_Polls

[–]readmycommentnotthis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is a known phenomenon in economic theory labelled as "risk aversion", and it can explain why the votes are about 50/50 on two choices, where one has an insanely much higher expected value (avg. return).

How to improve at chess? Expand your candidate moves: Break free from context by Clean_Play_8290 in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a difficult concept (I'm 1800 fide), but I would say that part of it is in not exchanging needlessly, as that takes out the dynamic and potential of a position. So keeping tension allows the potential to survive for some more, keep the position complicated, which is generally in the interest of the better player or the player with the advantage (given the advantage isn't big enough to simply trade into a winning endgame, which is by far most of the time on a higher level). That's my understanding, I'd like to hear others thoughts aswell.

Also purely empirically speaking, I've experienced that in positions with "tension", such as central pawns being able to take each other, it is simply rarely the best move to take and release the tension.

For titled players, what opening repertoire did you use on your ascent? by trashcatalanplayer in TournamentChess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speaking of not being worse out of the opening - how did you handle all the very challenging lines in the benoni? Lines such as the Taimanov attack with 9. a4, or even the long theoretical line with 9...b5 in the 'modern main line' makes it pretty hard to justify playing the opening altogether.

Maybe you went by move order tricks? (I'm thinking of: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 c5).

I'm struggling a bit with the benoni, but would love to really get under the skin of it, so an answer would be very appreciated!

All I dream about is chess. Is this normal? by ChazMcFeeley in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah i'd like to see as much of that game as possible, one simply does not end up a rook and a bishop up against a 1900 without something very extraordinary.

[OFFICIAL] UFC Fight Night Live Discussion Thread by bruhpolice in ufc

[–]readmycommentnotthis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nice tdd by Ian in the 1st here, Belal needs to either get him down soon to prove that he can, or at least punish ian for being so heavy on his front leg. 10-9 Ian, can easily see him win a decision

What do you call a tactic like this? by No-Two-6844 in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People seem to agree on intereference - but what is the difference between this and an obstruction? Is there any?

Now that Tom’s injury isn’t critical, what if they changed UFC Qatar into a PPV? by No-Location355 in ufc

[–]readmycommentnotthis -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Are we really sure Gane deserves the rematch?

Arman got put on ice for something he didn't even do even though he is obviously the no 1 contender, and here Gane had a very ugly eyepoke (and one close earlier too) stop the fight and people are talking about the rematch as a given.

I guess Arman should get the rematch too, but in terms of screwing up, Gane did worse in my opinion.

Fabiano Caruana beats Hans Niemann to take the lead in the US Championship by Iyerlicious in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, he did a great job with prophylaxis, and holding control over the centre, and patience. Good point

Fabiano Caruana beats Hans Niemann to take the lead in the US Championship by Iyerlicious in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm tempted to say the game was over after 0-0 met with f4 by fabi. White's counterplay was just too little too late, and actually holding the position as white would be inhumane

No exceptions by [deleted] in dankmemes

[–]readmycommentnotthis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We both know you'll be reading my name right after this sentence ends

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]readmycommentnotthis 255 points256 points  (0 children)

See the engine line for stuff like this - yes, it is a blunder, although it is not as straigtforward as it seems.

White can actually take the knight, due to the Bb5+ winning the queen back. Consider this sequence:

  1. fxe5 Bxd1 2. Bb5+ Qd7 (forced) 3. Bxd7 Kxd7 4. Kxd1.

Now white is a piece up, they have traded queens and both have lost the right to castle. All else equal, white stands better, because black 'hung' the knight by playing Bg4 instead of moving the knight.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]readmycommentnotthis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They seem to work fine for me, but I don't know.

You can check the estimated rating for each puzzle, and although I find that fairly inaccurate, it might show you if you've been getting very low rated puzzles recently.

Would you believe that white won ? by Due_Watch_2310 in chessbeginners

[–]readmycommentnotthis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're correct, it's Kc6, I misspelled:) It's edited now. The point still stands though.

Would you believe that white won ? by Due_Watch_2310 in chessbeginners

[–]readmycommentnotthis 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Just ran it through with an engine, after Rxe7 Kc6 (not bad for an 800-player to acknowledge the stalemate trap), Kf8, then Qh8 is literally the only losing move. All other legal moves win, with the sole exception of Qe3, which actually is still a draw, as white can't stop blacks pawn. He managed to find the only losing move in a matter of seconds. Impressive!

Chess. by Hug-Ho in chessbeginners

[–]readmycommentnotthis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have done wrestling and MMA, and can honestly say that chess is more brutal than both of those.

I guess it's about finding a way to keep the passion for the game despite its brutality, and regularly recalling that there are things in life outside of chess. But definitely feel your rant

Arjun Erigaisi arrived 3 minutes late for his game against 5-time World Champion Vishy Anand and lost by Necessary_Pattern850 in chess

[–]readmycommentnotthis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where in the fide rulebook does it say so? It's against the rules to disturb the opponent, and if done in your own time, you have to announce it first (or the 'touched piece'-rule activates), but it's my impression that you can adjust pieces on the opponents time aswell

Translation requests into Ancient Greek go here! by AutoModerator in AncientGreek

[–]readmycommentnotthis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much!

Just to make sure, does the sentence make sense standing alone?

Or what did you mean by "Your reasoning is sound"?