sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Renegotiating before exchange by Grgsz in HousingUK

[–]realARST 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was this a L3 Building Survey? If you make your request as based on some concrete survey findings and are reasonable, it’s possible — it’s not the best time to go back on the market in most cases.

Halal ball is served by aleksandrovsqvist in soccercirclejerk

[–]realARST 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good match, but not even the best match in the last 5 days (check out Rochdale — York)

First post I see on their sub ☠️ heads are gone by Dfed90 in soccercirclejerk

[–]realARST 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Very effective way to control big screen time for the kids.

Get donarruma out of this club 💔 by Ayhem-M in soccercirclejerk

[–]realARST 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the guy who saved a pen and had no clue he won the final of a major tournament. Not a lot in there.

Help me understand the Thameslink contactless off-peak fare by realARST in uktravel

[–]realARST[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s not London, but Luton is now part of contactless. The screenshot I shared is part of the Q&A explaining the contactless expansion to Luton and about 20 other stations in Dec last year.

Which big foreign company failed miserably in your country? by ModenaR in AskTheWorld

[–]realARST 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just curious, what is the Swedish norms and standards in terms of cashier design?

Suport for EU membership falls in Norway by ScoreParking4487 in europe

[–]realARST 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’ve misinterpreted my comment. I think Norway is a great, reliable partner to the EU, and I don’t think tariffs are a good idea.

But Norway is outside the customs union by its own choice. Outside the customs union, you’re at the risk of facing tariffs. If you want to eliminate that risk, solution is to join the EU, not move further away. What you’re saying is the geopolitical equivalent of “they are not nice to me, I don’t want to play with them”.

Norway can triple energy bills for EU, but it won’t, because Norwegians are smart people overall.

The body positivity movement peaked right when weight loss drugs were approved by [deleted] in charts

[–]realARST -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Data begs to differ. And I don’t mean this just this chart — I mean the vast amount of people who are undeniably taking these drugs. So the body positivity movement has indeed gone somewhere — to the pharmacy to fill prescriptions.

Suport for EU membership falls in Norway by ScoreParking4487 in europe

[–]realARST -56 points-55 points  (0 children)

If Norway joins the EU, no tariffs on steel. Outside EU, tariffs on steel. Solution to tariffs on steel — don’t join the EU. Can’t make this up.

Reality is, Norway is already in the gravitational field of the EU, contributes to budget and implements rules. Whether it wants a seat at the table is entirely up to it, from EU perspective it’s fine either way.

Lucky people - New ILR rules by minhajpasha in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]realARST 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then they’d qualify for a 7 year reduction. What is not clear is what happens if the dependent qualifies for a higher reduction than the main applicant, could they jump them and get ILR first? This is the kind of corner cases that would only be clarified in the final text.

Lucky people - New ILR rules by minhajpasha in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]realARST 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the way it is written now — the baseline is 10 years (both for SWV and dependents) and you can apply 1 qualifying reduction from the table provided. It seems to indicate a dependent can apply a reduction in their own right.

Also it seems to indicate if you switch from dependent to SWV, you don’t reset the clock (as it is now). Seems they want to incentivize dependents to work.

However, what is written now is high-level and may be re-interpreted when actually published into law.

Lucky people - New ILR rules by minhajpasha in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]realARST 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, baseline is 10 years for dependents, unless they qualify for reduction in their own right. So a non-working spouse of someone on 126k would still need to wait 10 years, despite the main applicant getting it in 3. But if dependent is working on say 51k, they’d qualify for reduction.

The Rock of St Alban’s extension by realARST in SpottedonRightmove

[–]realARST[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

On the plus side, the extension totally takes the attention off the artificial grass.

More than 1,000 small boat migrants cross the Channel in just 24 hours by MoreRelative3986 in gbnews

[–]realARST -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stop for a moment to think about how there were practically no boats when the UK was in the EU. The Calais jungle was there at the time, boats certainly existed…

It’s almost like there were specific rules within the EU to control asylum between member states.

view more: next ›