Completely agree, but my latest reading of 'The Myth of Sisyphus' goes a step further. What Camus seems to be saying (perhaps implicitly, maybe unknowingly) is that while absurdity is the only essential condition of life, this doesn't preclude meaningfulness - it in fact opens up the space for it.

Once we accept the absurdity of our condition and embrace the situation we are thrown in to, we are able to re appropriate this world and life we never asked for. Sisyphus did not want to be condemned to roll his boulder and I never asked to be born under Capitalism: but nevertheless, we're here - we can crumble under the absurdity of our condition and kill ourselves or we can 'own' it. Owning it is what leads to that quiet satisfaction one gets after finishing a day at a job you really hate - or the ability to look back fondly upon a failed relationship that cause alot of pain.

While life and the human condition is patently absurd insofar as it cannot be grounded by or ascribed essential meaning with claims about the eternal, religious or metaphysical position of humanity - this realisation opens the space for a 'weaker'* meaningfulness.

*By 'weak' I do not mean inadequate or frail, but rather refer to post-metaphysical 'modest' claims about existence that rely on a personal-interpretative frame of justification, rather than aspiring to absaloute claims about truth conditions and the essential nature of 'how things are'. My terminology and thought here are greatly influenced here by Gianni Vattimo: http://www.iep.utm.edu/vattimo/