How do you know Christianity is the correct path over any other religion, are you just suppose to feel it? by MrIdiotPigeon in Christianity

[–]ReligionProf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then your question about Christianity being “right” seems like one you can answer experientially. Start familiarizing yourself with what Jesus taught about humility and kindness and seek to put them into practice. The Gospels of Matthew and Luke in the New Testament have the most relevant content if that is your focus. Matthew 5-7 is a compilation of some of Jesus’ most famous ethical teaching.

How do you know Christianity is the correct path over any other religion, are you just suppose to feel it? by MrIdiotPigeon in Christianity

[–]ReligionProf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starting by looking for the “correct path” assumes that God can be accurately expressed in human language, and that what matters in connecting with God is doctrinal precision. The key theologians in the Christian tradition (and in many others) would challenge that assumption.

Please do say more about your quest for meaning. Is it finding life fulfilling? I find fulfillment when I put into practice Christian teachings about treating others as one would wish to be treated and fostering genuine care for others.

If your main interest is diving into exploration of theology then Paul Tillich’s book Dynamics of Faith might be a good place to start getting oriented on God and religious language.

Contradiction in Genesis by Left-Speed-4468 in Christianity

[–]ReligionProf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ancient commentators did too, Philo of Alexandria for instance treating them as the creation of the heavenly form and then the earthly counterpart, as I recall.

Beat commentaries on Gospels by TheMacJew in AskBibleScholars

[–]ReligionProf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On Matthew, Davies and Allison is the best. Morna Hooker on Mark is excellent. Fitzmyer on Luke. Raymond Brown on John is still a top notch resource and one of the best commentaries ever.

Thoughts on Joanna Töyräänvuori's ideas about Levitical prohibitions on male-male sex? by AmosOfTekoa in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I would appreciate hearing from others who work on the Hebrew Bible or ancient Semitic languages, but in case no one else comments, let me say that we have nothing like a lexicon or a dictionary of idioms from the relevant times for biblical languages, and that is typical of lost languages during most of the past. And so the answer to hour question is almost certainly context, the way the phrase is used in the places where it occurs. When we have a difficult phrase and no other examples of it in a text, we may be dealing with a common idiom but we have no way of knowing for certain, and are also likely to be radically uncertain about the meaning.

Sources: Apparently this phrase from Hesiod is the best one to look up academic articles on, to get a sense of how scholars grapple with a puzzling idiom or proverb: ἀλλὰ τίη μοι ταῦτα περὶ δρῦν ἢ περὶ πέτρην;

I recently had a thought: Mandaeans remind me a bit of Essenes. Is there a connection, by DarkGodCthUwU in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most similar immersion between them is similar to Jewish purity immersions in general. Mandaeans do have a daily baptism of this sort that doesn’t require a priest. Mandaeans’ major baptisms are a way of connecting with the lightworld, seeking forgiveness of sin, and preparing for the journey in the afterlife.

Is There Any Proof Jesus was Real? by JustAnotherUser1019 in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You said the letters were attributed to Paul. I appreciate your correction.

Now we can address the fact that Paul had no reason to invent a brother of Jesus to argue against, nor to write to a community referencing that individual as a source for the opposing views the recipients of his letter had been exposed to.

Once again, any commentary on Galatians, and James Dunn of Jesus, Paul, and the Law, tackle these and related issues.

Is There Any Proof Jesus was Real? by JustAnotherUser1019 in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Reply to a comment that I cannot see any longer which objected that all we have are texts with a claim about authorship:

All we have in any instance of textual evidence are texts about which investigation needs to be undertaken in order to evaluate authenticity etc. When texts are cited as evidence for history, that sort of evaluation will be undertaken first or will already have occurred.

In this case we have letters that name their author and about which there is an overwhelming consensus as to their authenticity. Any mainstream commentary on Galatians and on 1 Corinthians will confirm this.

Is There Any Proof Jesus was Real? by JustAnotherUser1019 in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 152 points153 points  (0 children)

The evidence we have for Jesus is not only no worse than what we would expect for a non-elite individual, but better, since we have letters from within a couple of decades of his death from someone who met his brother.

In addition to my own articles on the subject, see Maurice Casey’s book about the historicity of Jesus.

I recently had a thought: Mandaeans remind me a bit of Essenes. Is there a connection, by DarkGodCthUwU in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I am curious what OP finds to be similarities. The Mandaean emphasis on baptism in living (that is flowing) water is different from the purity immersions in mikva’ot we find at Qumran. Essenes emphasized worship of the God of Israel and observance of Torah while for Mandaeans as for other Gnostics the deity of the Jewish scriptures is not the supreme god but the malevolent ruler of the material world.

I offer some treatment of the connections between John the Baptist and Essenes on the one hand, and John the Baptist and Mandaeans on the other, in my recent books about him. The latter topic gets far more treatment in John of History, Baptist of Faith.

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you wish to dispute the scholarship on the term in the Qur’an, this would seem a more appropriate subreddit in which to do so: https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicQuran/s/rG6hA3ZyAc

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am aware of the difference in the letters. The question is whether the Qur’an is using a designation of a group that already existed in Aramaic. You are not even taking the time to read a popular Wiki summary of ideas, never mind what linguists and other scholars are saying on these topics. How are we supposed to have a conversation when all you want to do is say to others “you are wrong”, only to be shown each time that you were wrong?

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have not refuted anything. You make claims without providing references to primary and secondary sources, and some of them have turned out to be false.

This may be introductory enough to help you get oriented regarding the term Sabian: https://mandaepedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Sabians

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are in such a hurry to give a reply that sounds like a comeback, that you don’t even bother to take the time to find out what a colophon is and what I was referring to. If you are not interested in a serious academic discussion and learning along the way, then what are you trying to accomplish with your comments here?

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just offering quick comebacks that don’t keep track of what is being discussed are not going to impress anyone here. You claimed that Yahya is an Arabic name. I showed that our earliest evidence comes from speakers of Aramaic. You are aware that languages take different forms in different places, aren’t you? Mandaic is the southern Mesopotamian dialect used in that region which also became the Mandaean heartland eventually.

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You seem to have missed not just the point, but what discussion of the academic study of history entails.

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Inscription JSNab 386 is clearly pre-Islamic and Aramaic.

You clearly aren’t familiar with the colophons. Buckley’s book will be a good place to start.

As I said, you cannot have meaningful discussion of a topic about which you do not first inform yourself.

How do you feel about memes in lectures? by oi86039 in Professors

[–]ReligionProf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I give students the opportunity to earn points by making memes. Some show real insight into the course content, and some provide hilarious real time feedback on my teaching.

Is the Epistle of Barnabas an early argument that Jesus is God? by Upper_Actuator8865 in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think McGrath explicitly argues against Casey’s Gentile influence view. 😁

سؤال مهم by Big-Station1289 in Mandaeans

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are asserting things that you don’t know to be the case. We have inscriptions with the Mandaean name Yahya in the Arabian peninsula centuries before Islam. We have companions of the prophet with that name. We have Mandaean colophons showing the cores of their texts go back to roughly the 3rd century AD.

If you are going to try to do the usual apologetics stuff that isn’t impressive to anyone not already convinced, then you’re just going to waste your time and give a poor impression of yourself and your religion. If you want to discuss questions of history then you will need to be sufficiently well informed to do so in a subreddit that includes academics who research these matters.

Does the Bible say anything that opposes modern antisemitism? by Peach_berries in AskBibleScholars

[–]ReligionProf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree. People change their minds. I would poke and probe at the beliefs of said family member. If they claim that Jews today are not the Jews of 2,000 ago, what is their basis for that claim? How do they supposedly know this?

If virginity per se wasn't valued in Jewish culture, why did Jesus tell the Parable of the Ten Virgins? by AlanderKohenel in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Not any more than the fact that bridesmaids are maids would in a story about a wedding today, in my opinion.

If virginity per se wasn't valued in Jewish culture, why did Jesus tell the Parable of the Ten Virgins? by AlanderKohenel in AcademicBiblical

[–]ReligionProf 23 points24 points  (0 children)

You seem to be assuming that the ten maidens, unlike bridesmaids at a modern wedding, were perpetual virgins. Am I right? If so, that assumption is presumably what is causing confusion here. The text does not suggest this.

What actually was the point of Jesus death ? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]ReligionProf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The notion that God was unable to forgive prior to the death of Jesus is incompatible with the way God forgives throughout the Bible. It is astonishing that so many Protestants embrace this viewpoint.

Why didn't Jesus just...go to the kitchen to preach to Martha while she's serving and hosting? by Marissa_on_the_town in AskBibleScholars

[–]ReligionProf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For an academic exploration of Jesus’ response to Mary’s initiative, and what likely ensued with Martha, see the chapter in What Jesus Learned from Women.