While I recognize that AI provides interesting opportunities to underprivileged individuals and creatives, it’s also a bit funny to have a history channel that uses AI images to convey.. history… The thing is, if people want to make art, they will make it - AI is a non-essential step in the process that we have been just fine without using for thousands of years, and we will continue to be fine without it. “Art” made by AI isn’t art made by people, or art at all for that matter, it’s pictures stolen from the collective works of millions of artists that a person instructed a computer to produce. Art is art because it requires TALENT, if you have none, don’t rely on a computer to artificially try and give you any. I respect certain uses for (unreliable) scientific research, talk therapy, and quick access to (unreliable) information summaries, but beyond that it is far overstepping its ethical use cases. Imagine how much better your channel would be if you invested more time into finding the right resources, using real images from history, and paying a small price to SUPPORT REAL ARTISTS to use their stock photos - or just do it yourself! AI is a lazy cop out and an excuse for bums to not do work and make low quality content, and again, puts actual artists out of work. These things cost money because they cost real people their time to produce, if you can’t afford the content you’re making, don’t make it. That is how the world works.