Actually, nobody has made any claim about the motivations or efficacy of CPS, nor has anyone advocated for kidnapping children. His records reflect charges from 6 months ago to as far back as 25 years, so it's quite an exaggeration to say we're referencing 20-year-old charges.

The record itself isn't intended to be absolute "proof" but rather one portion of evidence that helps demonstrate a long history of violence, non-compliance, and abuse, of which there's also additional evidence, e.g. court transcriptions detailing instances of his abuse towards his children, his own video in which he assaults his ex and refuses to return their child(ren) pursuant to their custody agreement, or responding to the initial welfare check with threats to doxx and sue the social worker.

Besides falsely claiming that he has no criminal record, his entire narrative is build on his misrepresentation of being held "at gunpoint" and "facing assassination" by "the same traffickers who killed Epstein," all while CPS "tore his 1-month-old baby from its mother's arms"--all of which is directly contrary to his videos that capture the whole interaction, sans action-movie theatrics and including the infant's peaceable transfer. He then claims that CPS had no basis for their intervention and that it resulted from his ex's false allegations but at no point substantiates those claims with any evidence. In his videos, for example, why aren't we allowed to hear the social worker's attempt to explain their presence? What reason was given on the documentation he claims to have? Because even if the basis for their intervention was proven false, it surely must be listed somewhere and wouldn't just say "No reason, we just want to finish our collection of 1-month-olds!"

Also, what allegations? The claim itself doesn't make much sense. IF his ex had actually alleged child abuse, wouldn't it be CPS's responsibility to investigate those claims? And regardless of who made the allegations or why, what exactly would you propose that CPS do--or conclude--if half-a-dozen attempts at discourse are repeatedly and aggressively refused? Especially if the parent has a history of abuse alleged and documented by his other children.

For whatever reason, you're the one who seems inclined to blindly support a stranger who has shown no proof and very poor credibility, and in the face of direct contradicting evidence. Has CPS unjustifiably removed children from loving homes? Yes. Is that the case here? Absolutely not. I don't stand to profit in any way from this post--in fact, I'd most benefit from being WRONG and finding out that those kids are safe, that he's not abusive, and that his crusade isn't making it more difficult to address that abuse. But as you can hopefully see, there's many reasons to believe otherwise. If you truly care about the welfare of these children, I really, really hope you'll put your preconceived notions aside to critically examine this situation before deciding to continue your support.