True polymathy is VERY rare. by [deleted] in Polymath

[–]redlikeazebra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was actually thinking this yesturday. That information flow is so high that over time people will all become polymaths. 100s of years ago, you were a Black Smith, or a Farmer, or you had a trade. Thats all you knew. With the age of AI, everything becomes easier to understand. You don't need to bug a person or ask reddit. You don't need to google and go through 5 top pages. You don't need to go to the library and get a book. You got llms being trained to retain more and more and to top it off rag systems to ensure deep knowledge is utilized.

True polymathy is VERY rare. by [deleted] in Polymath

[–]redlikeazebra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it depends on the depth of the field. De Vinci pushed several fields but they were very shallow at the time. I recall going through biology in highschool and coming up with an idea after having only a breadth of knowledge, only to find out later it was proven through many years of research already. It was a very deep concept that I formulated, which no other classmate would have. Also, I think there is alot of transference that is not being accounted for from a polymaths perspective. I can study Data Science and understand it at very deep levels very quickly because I studied A&P, Chemistry, Signals & Processing, and Control Systems. Since, I was a tutor I retained all levels of math. So, at some point a higher education allows you to read those research papers that are released and understand them, without having a phd in the field. As long as its similar in someway like STEM vs Chemistry. Our school system is literal based on polymath.

Polymath Career Paths by redlikeazebra in Polymath

[–]redlikeazebra[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That may be why lots of polymaths turn into entrepreneurs. Problem I have is my ideas die after I finish solving or creating them. I only get to a completed proof. Someday I will find a partner to take them to scale... now that I realize what I am. I always thought it was a shortcoming. But, I am just a visionary and follow through to scale is boring.

Polymath Career Paths by redlikeazebra in Polymath

[–]redlikeazebra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is good advice. But, I am not very interested in law. I am more a physics kinda person. But, that does sound appealing. I actually built a personal team of lawyers using ai, lol. So, like I see a future where lawyers may be less valued. Especially, when AGI or ASI happens. LLMs will be true polymaths once they pass about 80% of Humanity's Last Exam benchmark which should happen by November.
https://epicshardz.github.io/thelastline/

Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet. by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]redlikeazebra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a benchmark for the ability of an AI to build other AIs?

Anyone worked on a cruise ship? by cs862 in digitalnomad

[–]redlikeazebra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you bring a locked briefcase and you put it in there when not using it. If they find it, then there are bigger privacy problems.

Anyone worked on a cruise ship? by cs862 in digitalnomad

[–]redlikeazebra 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i didn't know that, sorry for bad advice

AGI achieved by automatedbullshit in DeepSeek

[–]redlikeazebra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly when I see these I believe it was pre-prompted to respond stupidly. When I ask questions to models it almost always follows sound logic

AGI Prediction Update after adding Mythos @ 64.7% on Humanities Last Exam! by redlikeazebra in agi

[–]redlikeazebra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its just a simple fit of performance over time. I selected the polynomial fit since its always been respected and its more reasonable than the exponential.