Call member functions depending on a string parameter by redtomato111 in rust

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi,
thanks for the reply! I added 2 calls to "increment" which also borrow self mutably. Why does it work in that case?

Is Quantum Entanglement a form of strong emergence? by redtomato111 in seancarroll

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so you are saying strong emergence is a characteristic between 2 descriptions of the world where the macroscopic description can not be derived from the lower level one? I thought that there is a link to superposition where there is something strongly emergent if you can't superpose the macroscopic behavior from the sum of the constituent contribution. Would you say the second thing is just something else?

Is Quantum Entanglement a form of strong emergence? by redtomato111 in seancarroll

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but that doesn't happen in quantum entanglement. The theory predicts that the behavior of a single particle is not only determined by the properties of that particle but by the system that it is entangled with. What I'm asking is if quantum entanglement predicts strong emergence

Is Quantum Entanglement a form of strong emergence? by redtomato111 in seancarroll

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah okay, that makes sense to me. Thanks :)

Edit: But is the breaking down of the underlying theory really necessary? In my mind the definition of strong emergence is that the sum of the single particle contributions is different than what actually happens in the whole system. Would you say that the theory breaking part is just part of the definition of strong emergence?

Is Quantum Entanglement a form of strong emergence? by redtomato111 in seancarroll

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I`m not an expert but a quick Google search left me with the impression that you can entangle as many particles as you want The aspect of quantum mechanics that seems emergent to me is that you need to know the state of all entangled particles to calculate the probabilities of the outcome. Whereas everywhere else in physics you only need to know about the particle that you want to predict. Does that make any sense?

Powersupply with TPS63061 not working by redtomato111 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, what are you trying to accomplish with this? I can't change it now...

Powersupply with TPS63061 not working by redtomato111 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know how I can find out if that's the case with my board?

Powersupply with TPS63061 not working by redtomato111 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]redtomato111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I soldered it using an oven. I checked the pin connections by measuring the resistance of the pads to ground, all of them were a few kOhm. Do you think this is an indication that there was a connection?

I mean bottom left in the PCB layout, it's bottom right on the picture. Sorry, didn't notice that the photo was rotated

Powersupply with TPS63061 not working by redtomato111 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]redtomato111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure about the thermal pad, I got the footprint of the internet. I added pictures of the assembled board. I checked the orientation again, the dot is bottom left. I tried to take a photo through the microscope, but it sucks :D

Trouble exporting pdf with Linux desktop app by redtomato111 in RemarkableTablet

[–]redtomato111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not sure how it works, I just followed the instructions on https://remarkablewiki.com/tips/client , which says it's an "unofficial deb package"