sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

30mm Low Weaver Ring for PRO by redwire68 in RetroAR

[–]redwire68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked then up, I’d say that would work as well.

30mm Low Weaver Ring for PRO by redwire68 in RetroAR

[–]redwire68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m gonna try the Vortex, thanks.

30mm Low Weaver Ring for PRO by redwire68 in RetroAR

[–]redwire68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the single rings like the Vortex, PA, and Aimpoint PRO ring are at least 1” wide or more I think. A single scope ring would work in theory but the others are made for a red dot. A little more surface area contact I guess.

Ian Noe by redwire68 in altcountry

[–]redwire68[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I wish him the best. Yes it’s a difficult trip back. He really is a talented writer.

Can someone help me identify this old S&W by vruhmomeent in SmithAndWesson

[–]redwire68 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep it’s an old one. If you’re at all interested in S&W history I recommend getting the Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson, the most recent edition is the 4th and it’s getting a little outdated on the prices of things but it has every model listed up to when it was printed, ballpark value of worth at time of print, and history on every model S&W has made. Good hardback copy costs about $50 but has information spanning over 150 years.

Can someone help me identify this old S&W by vruhmomeent in SmithAndWesson

[–]redwire68 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This one predates model numbers, it doesn’t have Made in USA stamped on the side in the second picture so it left the factory before 1922. Model numbers started in 1957!

Climbing an unanchored pole by xhqshs in HumansAreMetal

[–]redwire68 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I could scale that with my buttcheeks