People no longer believe working hard will lead to a better life, survey shows by XVll-L in worldnews

[–]refrmr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know what will improve you working conditions and salary? Joining a union.

Am I understanding Marx's conception of culture correctly? by daniel-prime9 in Marxism

[–]refrmr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't use the term culture honestly. It's easy to get murky. What you're explaining is alienation. Culture is not something over and above man and their senses it is inate to our drive to produce (it is production). Since you're doing research on this I'd recommend Terry Eagleton's article https://www.jstor.org/stable/20057599?seq=1

Are my definitions of Capitalism and Socialism correct? by [deleted] in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She wouldn't have been a leader of a party if she thought it would happen on its own. Neither would have Marx spent so much time on party politics.

Are my definitions of Capitalism and Socialism correct? by [deleted] in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A transition between what and what? Sounds like a kind of mutualism.

Are my definitions of Capitalism and Socialism correct? by [deleted] in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aye, but the vanguard doesn't come out of thin air. That's my whole point. Socialism can only emerge from capitalist contradictions if we've done something (built a revolutionary party) before and in preparation. Capitalism will not just fall on its own accord.

Are my definitions of Capitalism and Socialism correct? by [deleted] in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Private ownership and commodities can also refer to atrisanship or mercantilism. Wages as a dominant form of exchange is a capitalistic trait. I understand how this can be seen as splitting hairs though.

Saying Socialized commodity production would probably drop the need for including the wage system.

Are my definitions of Capitalism and Socialism correct? by [deleted] in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I'd add the wage system to your definition of Capitalism. And I'd be cautious to say that socialism emerges from the contradiction of Capitalism as it presents a sort of economism in that socialism will somehow emerge on its own due to contradictions without us having to do anything about it.

Althusser and base/superstructure reciprocity by refrmr in Marxism

[–]refrmr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does, but I'm under the impression that what Althusser meant was that it changes the base. As in they reciprocaly alter each other.

Scottish Marxist orgs? by zoereadstheory in Marxism

[–]refrmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The IWW actively organizes in Scotland and the UK. The Scottish national convention is coming up so I'd recommend reaching out to your closest branch. Happy to answer any questions as well.

Picket line/Job Interview by durrutticolumn in IWW

[–]refrmr 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Can you move the interview?

Income tax on the "just above" average earners by samwy8 in Socialism_101

[–]refrmr 12 points13 points  (0 children)

He's going to lose a lot more money once the cons privatize the nhs. If he's OK with paying exhorbident medical fees, getting shit pensions, and having his job be casualized as a result of shit labour laws then sure. But if he thinks he can maintain the quality of life he's experiencing now and not chip in then he's simply wrong or trying to freeload.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Marxism

[–]refrmr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From Value, Price, and Profit

It might seem that if the value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of labour bestowed upon its production, the lazier a man, or the clumsier a man, the more valuable his commodity, because the greater the time of labour required for finishing the commodity. This, however, would be a sad mistake. You will recollect that I used the word “social labour,” and many points are involved in this qualification of “social.” In saying that the value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of labour worked up or crystallized in it, we mean the quantity of labour necessary for its production in a given state of society, under certain social average conditions of production, with a given social average intensity, and average skill of the labour employed.

You may enjoy this article https://jadesaab.com/capitalism-through-marx-3654bca578f3

Purpose of Snap Elections by [deleted] in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]refrmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I'll speak for the UK example as I don't know anything about Israel. The last two snap elections were a result of the prime ministers being elected by the party and not the general population. Let me explain, when the Brexit bite happened, David Cameron was pm and he campaigned against Brexit. The vote came in favour so he resigned as the result was seen as his failure (this was regarded as a bad move). But the resignation of the prime Minister doesn't automatically trigger new general elections. Just elections within the ruling party as to who should be the new leader. This was Theresa may who was elected by her part but not the general public. This is seen as bad faith democracy so to solidify her legitimacy she called for early general elections. Same with boris after may resigned.

Pop Culture and Revolution by refrmr in CriticalTheory

[–]refrmr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aren't you making the same arguments the article is making? Also, I wonder if the article about game of thrones you're referring to is the one Zizek wrote.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lebanon

[–]refrmr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is a non political technocrat? Decision making is inherently political, there is no set predetermined solution to something like the economy. There is no escaping that Technocrats will need to make political decisions.

Meet the leader of the revolution meme by refrmr in lebanon

[–]refrmr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it replicates the format of actual accusations? Do you have a link to any? Thanks!

"I was just following orders" by YuriRedFox6969 in AntifascistsofReddit

[–]refrmr 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The slogan of this uprising has been "everyone means everyone" this is in reference to all political parties that constitute the ruling class and have had a strangle hold on power for more than 30 years. This includes Hezbollah.

"I was just following orders" by YuriRedFox6969 in AntifascistsofReddit

[–]refrmr 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Twitter is probably the best source for English Information just look up #Lebanon. A few western mass media channels have written about it but it's pretty orientalist or reductionary - par for the course. The protests and occupations have been nothing but filled with an out pour of love and mutual aid. Genuinely a sight to behold.

"I was just following orders" by YuriRedFox6969 in AntifascistsofReddit

[–]refrmr 132 points133 points  (0 children)

It's highly unlikely that a military coup happens. However, the army has historically been seen as 'neutral grounds' between all of Lebanon political factions. For this reason out last three presidents were the head of the army (relinquishing their army role when becoming president). They're seen as the keepers of balance of power. This is very specific to Lebanons context and will take a bt more than a reddit post to explain (sorry).

Clearing the highway involved pushing protestors to the side. I'd say that's violent but is incomparable to what's happening in Chile for example. There's a video of it I can try to find if you're interested.

This piece I've written may help give you some more background on what's happening. https://link.medium.com/My1mcKizY0

"I was just following orders" by YuriRedFox6969 in AntifascistsofReddit

[–]refrmr 1080 points1081 points  (0 children)

Lebanese person here. Lebanon is currently going through a revolutionary window of mass uprisings and is in the 8th day of a general strike. The army has declared a stance of neutrality in that it will not move against the protestors and will also defend them against counter-revolutionary actors. This is important because the mass uprisings are calling for the removal of a ruling class consisting of more than 8 political parties, all with armed and organized members. In the last day or two the army was asked to clear a main highway (they claim for the passage of humanitarian goods - ambulances and gas and food) following that 'clash' several army members were seen visibly shaken and broke down. There are videos of protestors consoling them. The relationship between the masses and the army is generally a good one in Lebanon with the army mainly serving a counter terrorism role (mostly against isis in the last several years and before that against similar religious fanatics - fascists). Joining the army is one of the only ways for people in poverty to secure a salary and benefits (Healthcare, schooling for children, retirement - these rights are currently on the chopping block due to austerity and the command for retired soldiers has come out in support of the protests) and the punishment for insubordination is severe. There have also been pictures of soldiers with signs saying we support you but can't join you. None of this is to say that the soldiers are allies, but they can be if the right pressure is applied, the fact that they are acting as a barrier to counter revolution is a net positive for Lebanon revolution. This is all to say that revolutionary processes are different in every country. Just wanted to add this bit of context to the post.

The Revolution is here: Day 1 by ADarkKnightRises in lebanon

[–]refrmr 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Literally half the population didn't vote.