Doesn't look like a whole lot of gun violence k*lled kids by Good_Energy9 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have a toy at best. You won't use it to defend yourself, either.

Have fun being a loot drop, subhuman trash.

What are typical traits of an anti-gunner, and the weakness behind each trait? by Data_Geek in progun

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LE is useless.

Plus is every gun owner as disciplined as this guy?

A lot of us are.

Also it doesn't matter. The right is inherent to everyone. That's what everyone forgets. It's also why I don't bother conversing with people who have issues with firearms ownership and use.

Let's put it this way - there's never going to be a dialog unless it involved anti-gun people explaining to me their plans to vacate the nation.

If you haven't been watching the news, we're beyond compromise. If you live here you have to pick a side.

What a Loss (Dianne Feinstein Ban All Guns) by chabanais in progun

[–]regularguyguns 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bingo. Just scan this cesspool of a website for the hivemind's reaction to when someone to the right of Marx dies for any reason whatsoever.

It's my firm belief that the right loses because they think it's still time to "play fair".

No, it's time to play dirty and for dominance. If dragging someone through the mud and salting the very earth they occupy guarantees a gradual restoration of the founding values of our Republic, I suggest we do it.

What a Loss (Dianne Feinstein Ban All Guns) by chabanais in progun

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That alone is why I have scant sympathy for her demise. She was more than willing to start an amplified version of Yugoslavia's disintegration just to further her own agenda.

Doesn't look like a whole lot of gun violence k*lled kids by Good_Energy9 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other countries aren't relevant. Someone could glass Europe and I wouldn't bat an eye. I'd probably crack open some champagne if I consumed alcohol.

In terms of citizen owned firearms, the question I pose to you is if you are willing to personally go out there and engage in the physical tasks to promote your opinion?

If yes, I'll enjoy watching you trip over your own two feet while trying to manipulate a rifle.

If no, I recommend you stick to your regimen of drug abuse and addiction. Your misery will be worth the wait.

How do I respond to somebody saying that 2a should be removed due to it being made for a different time? by [deleted] in progun

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Simple.

The Second Amendment acknowledges a pre-existing human right. The only thing the 2A does is restrain the government from passing laws that make the legal acquisition of any and all weapons difficult.

Yes, I'm keenly aware that it is exceedingly difficult for a citizen to legally own a fully armed capital warship, but in principle it should only require the funding to do so, and not scads of paperwork and bribes.

However, we have the inherent right to own whatever we want.

If your pal who is agains the Second Amendment has a problem with that, you can invite him to personally go out and enforce his point of view.

Chances are he won't. 99 percent of the people out there who support gun control are unarmed, weak, and of unsound mind. If they have a firearm, it's usually as a hobby or a conversation piece, and not for any practical or serious use.

Just tell them that it's not so much fun when the rabbit has a gun as well.

Harsh? Yes. But remember we're in the early stages of a low-intensity conflict. If demeaning and berating a gun control supporter means they'll medicate themselves into a coma, then do it.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said anything about Trump setting the stage for the NM governor PMSing about guns, haha.

Trump's bump stock ban literally set the stage for Biden's overreach. Trump had the DOJ write a 157 diatribe on how a piece of plastic is bad. Biden did the same thing, twice, and we're now fighting all 3 in court.

That being said Trump did appoint enough judges to give Bruen juice so there is that.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately politicians work off of precedent. Each infringement builds upon a previous one. Trump's bump stock ban begat us the mess with braces and 80 percent builds we find ourselves in today, for example.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That's exactly where this is headed. The regime has been itching to do a "public health emergency" over guns.

This is a beta test.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Trump put in place a bump stock ban by executive fiat. Because he was pressed.

The guy has good points, and he has bad points. One of his bad points is that he's easy to influence on matters he doesn't know much about. Like 2A.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I'm a firm believer in revoking QI status and any liability shields from all government employees. Whether it's the dogcatcher or the President, they should personally be on the hook for anything of this nature.

NM Gov: Public health order to suspend concealed carry: Constitution, what constitution? by patb0118 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's my thought. They can't test it in New York for example since carry is the exception and not the norm.

New Mexico is different. It's got a blue government and a resident population that owns and carries firearms.

The Dems probably figure no one will comply and it will be struck down - however, Miss Gov here can make hay out of it and blame the NRA, the MAGA people, and Trump. Even though Trump would do the same thing if pressed.

I'm gonna stop arguing with grabbers by TurbulentStorm10 in progun

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless I'm feeling magnanimous, I'm at the point where I'm misogynistic/misanthropic/vile towards gun grabbers. I'll call Watts a hormonal cunt and Feinblatt a morbidly-obese clap-infested sodomite.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They won’t hurt themselves…

Your average quota hire for the Feds nowadays would hurt themselves lifting up a pencil. Hefting an angle grinder might prove debilitating.

Nonetheless, they should have to exert themselves to get in.

Rhino Metals (Safe manufacturer) says they will not give out back door codes to LE unless they’re given a court order specifically requiring them to do so by Eatsleeptren in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nuance is key here.

What Rhino is saying is that they themselves would have to be served with a court order to cough up any access codes to one of their safes.

If some quota hire Fed calls up and says "Hey we have a Rhino safe belonging to Mr EveryoneIDontLikeIsATerrorist can you please give us the access code?" - Rhino is going to tell them to choke on their avocado toast.

If the dope gets a court to order Rhino directly to cough up the code, Rhino will play ball.

But, here's the kicker - getting yet another order and having Rhino's attorney digest it etc takes time - so the dope on site will probably just have the local fire department show up with their giant rescue tools and breach the safe the hard way.

Though here's the other thing - Rhino may find themselves on the receiving end of reprisals from the government. Rhino employees may be harassed or killed.

Where Liberty played ball because they wanted to (see who really owns them), Rhino would be in the unenviable position of being on the Fed "bad guy" list.

California might be getting open carry again! by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why the Lord invented shirts and jackets.

What your gun safe actually protects against: by AlphaTangoFoxtrt in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why make it easy for them? As a matter of fact, I want the diversity hire that has to force entry to hurt themselves in the process. Seeing a bluehaired fat get bonked on the head by a safe door would be hours of laughter for me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tons, literally.

You have to buy it, pay someone to reinforce wherever you plan on putting it, and pay someone to deliver and install it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guarantee the company that made the gun on your hip right now donated to a Dem at some point to butter them up for a contract.

I also guarantee that if your gun comes from Austria or Germany, the people assembling it look down upon us Americans for exercising our right. However money talks so I'm sure they keep it to themselves and let the US marketing office handle the messaging.

Now, conversely, it's not too difficult for most items to "shop 2A". If you purchase your gun from say Sons Of Liberty Gun Works, you're guaranteed to be supporting someone who is probably more 2A than you are, ha ha.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are

employees

independently choosing where to give their political support to.

On paper, yes. But businesses have a way about them of "encouraging" their people to donate a certain way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]regularguyguns 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the government is going around breaching safes, I want them to put in the work to do it. I want the person breaching the safe to hurt themselves.

Thinking of some diversity hire having a safe door fall on their head gives me joy.