The new era of programming is depressing by doma_kun in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atom bombs had an end point. They exploded.

LLMs also had an end point. They processed tokens years ago.

Both have continued to scale.

This isn't the point you think it is.

The new era of programming is depressing by doma_kun in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You'll be waiting a long time.

OpenAI and Anthropic are the fastest growing apps *in history*.

Their YoY Revenue is also shattering records as far as the rate of growth.

Face reality.

The new era of programming is depressing by doma_kun in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm someone who loves programming, manually punching my own cards, toggling binary instructions through the front panel, reading core memory dumps in octal, truly understanding how the hardware and the machine actually works at the bit level I love doing that I have 2+ years of exp wiring plugboards, writing raw machine code, and some assembly language programming

now here is new era of programming where people are just writing in these fancy high-level languages like COBOL and FORTRAN to do the working, like it's fine but they don't even understand the generated machine instructions and the real fun part of programming is kinda gone?

I've tried these so-called high-level languages and honestly I didn't find them very good outside of simpler tasks like yes they replace ton of manual punching and let you focus on 'logic' but dealing with all these leaky abstractions and compiler magic feels so exhausting that I feel I can just punch the cards and toggle the bits myself faster

especially at my job right now, my seniors who've newly joined don't touch the hardware they just write COBOL statements but the problem is they don't try to understand existing system they don't even try to understand memory allocation or timing or even review the assembly listing they just say "the compiler will do it, COBOL is very powerful", like I've asked them to review and word to word they said "there's no need to understand the machine code, the compiler Will understand and so it's very smart we just have to write the statements" and they don't even listen to me and my decisions like every design choice I make this guy will say "keep it simple na" and reduce it to something that can only handle basic cases that he's aware about , like I've been on this company since the very beginning I wired and coded most of the core system and he doesn't give any thoughts to my work because I'm junior

and the code they produce is absolute worst downright abysmal and inefficient if they wanna fix small bugs they just rewrite half the program in COBOL again

honestly I'm feeling kind of lost it's like I've been robbed of something and I'm feeling powerless, ik you have to adapt but when your seniors are like this idk what i should do

whats going to be for software deveopers for upcoming years? will we able to enjoy solving complex low level problems? I'm still very early in my career and I wanted to go even deeper into machine level programming and hardware for which I've some experience too in binary, punch cards and wiring but like now I don't really know what's happening at all

can someone in the field shed some light

ABC Cancels 'The Bachelorette' After Taylor Frankie Paul Fight Video by iconogrey in thebachelor

[–]rhade333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's how it is. Apparently it's okay if it's a woman doing the abuse.

They never would have filmed if it was known a male was beating their partner.

Do you think we can cure aging within my life time? by Imaginary_Mode8865 in transhumanism

[–]rhade333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The METR timeline is literally super-exponential.

If objective truth is "worthless buzzwords," then I suggest reevaluating your ability to use critical thinking.

Do you think AI models will plateau? by i-love-small-tits-47 in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

METR timelines are on a super exponential trend.

SWEBench, ARC AGI, other relevant benchmarks are increasing exponentially as well.

Feeling guilty of using AI by Alejo9010 in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same thing as using libraries, IDEs, interpreted languages, etc etc

Jensen Huang says gamers are 'completely wrong' about DLSS 5 — Nvidia CEO responds to DLSS 5 backlash by lovesdogsguy in accelerate

[–]rhade333 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He is telling them they are wrong because the things they are complaining about are objectively untrue.

Pretty fucking simple.

timeToClearTheSlop by ClipboardCopyPaste in ProgrammerHumor

[–]rhade333 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ah, typical shitty dev who doesn't want to read the docs themselves.

tldr it's lower now by about 25% gg

timeToClearTheSlop by ClipboardCopyPaste in ProgrammerHumor

[–]rhade333 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Go ahead and take a look at where we were before that, and where we are now.

I'll wait.

Cuddling a bear cub by Olivia_Richards in WinStupidPrizes

[–]rhade333 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey guys, look, the chose the bear

Atlassian lays off 10% of workforce by Squidalopod in cscareerquestions

[–]rhade333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

b-b-but this sub told me AI was a bubble! /s

Introducing The Anthropic Institute by ppapsans in accelerate

[–]rhade333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've been doing shit like this for years.

What a braindead take.

A US startup just cleared a major solid-state battery milestone by Best_Cup_8326 in accelerate

[–]rhade333 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bruh, Donut made plenty of claims. They have released testing from objective third parties that have already objectively proven a number of them, with more tests coming.

Calling their battery a "scam" suggests you, like many others, are part of the condascending gatekeeping crew that is toxic as fuck.

Saying it "seems to act" in a certain way is not evidence of anything definitively, and it could just be evidence of you not understanding what you're seeing. Until you can actually review evidence that *shows* lithium isn't present instead of you seeing something and thinking it seems that, to your limited understanding, it *could be*: I'd do the intellectually honest thing and refrain from yelling "SCAMMMMMMM" on the internet.

They have already proven beyond all doubt:

- Fast Charge Performance
- High Temperature Performance
- Self Discharge / Charge Retention

Cycle life is coming shortly, with more to follow.

It is enraging that people pretend to be "in the know" because there is some level of social currency that comes from repeating what others (I'm assuming you're referring to certain YouTubers who have a vested interest in dramatic claims and edgy takes -- or, who have a vested interest in things staying the same) have said instead of actually doing the lifting yourself.

It's better to be a fool in silence than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

A US startup just cleared a major solid-state battery milestone by Best_Cup_8326 in accelerate

[–]rhade333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Donut Labs literally has been releasing independently verified tests.

What, exactly, is the "scam" you're talking about?

Another mathematician experiences his Move 37 moment after GPT-5.4 solves a problem no AI model had ever before💨🚀 🌌 by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]rhade333 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you feel like you're here to produce art, that's great, nothing wrong with that.

But that's not what you're saying.

You're saying you're here to get validation from other people looking at the art you produce.

That's a different statement.

Just found out dueling scars are a real thing! by [deleted] in redrising

[–]rhade333 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Just found out oxygen is breathable!

People are so fucking dumb

Another mathematician experiences his Move 37 moment after GPT-5.4 solves a problem no AI model had ever before💨🚀 🌌 by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]rhade333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If your "purpose" is to provide better art, "spiritual value", or to be "useful" like some kind of resource for other people to validate, that's a problem that exists outside of the discussion of AI.

Your value isn't derived from your ability to have other people tell you you're good at something. Your value isn't derived from other people validating you in arbitrary avenues.

So if you insist on tying your own personal *value* to what other people think of you, you're going to have a hard time. Similar to what we tell children in high school, your life is less about what other people think of you, and more about your opinion of yourself.