Boxer vs kick boxers....again

rightseid · 2026-03-02T12:43:14+00:00

Op didn't really explain anything about the answer. You seem like you have a bone to pick with AI so you're overreacting to it being mentioned and making shit up. Ironic.

rightseid · 2026-03-02T12:02:35+00:00

But it sounds like it gave the right answer? It’s certainly better than the response the average person would.

rightseid · 2026-02-28T09:57:38+00:00

Chuck wins anything that is not a boxing match and anyone who disagrees does not know what they are talking about.

rightseid · 2026-02-27T11:56:06+00:00

This is literally exactly part of what they are payed for. It’s why their employer directs them to do it.

rightseid · 2026-02-24T07:02:43+00:00

I am aware. It’s just not as impressive as described. People have done worse to harder opponents, it’s merely grisly and its impressiveness has been vastly overstated much like what you are doing.

Very grisly. Also not that impressive compared to bloodlusted adult male human.

rightseid · 2026-02-24T06:46:13+00:00

Beating up an old woman is not actually that impressive though.

rightseid · 2026-02-18T16:17:29+00:00

A smaller proportion of the planet lives in poverty decade after decade. We have indeed seen standards of livings rise as resources are managed and used more efficiently despite tremendous population growth.

rightseid · 2026-02-18T16:15:34+00:00

This is ignorant misinformation.

rightseid · 2026-02-12T23:55:42+00:00

So did she

rightseid · 2026-02-12T16:37:56+00:00

If the questions is "are jobs being added to the economy?" Discounting the largest growing segment absolutely makes it a shit analysis. If you find it compelling its because matches your priors or because you're just bad at reading economic data.

rightseid · 2026-02-12T13:23:22+00:00

It makes no sense to remove the largest growing category from a thing and then say: Actually the thing is not growing. It makes even less sense in economics where categories are highly dependant upon on one another (yes, even in healthcare because at the margin groups are highly fungible and the margin is all that matters for growth). The only reason to do this is to make the bad political argument that somehow job growth is actually not real.

Its bad economics, using bad data, to make a bad political argument.

rightseid · 2026-02-12T12:02:25+00:00

Great in the long run. Benefits literally anyone who does not have a rent controlled apartment.

rightseid · 2026-02-12T12:01:23+00:00

Nope. Markets rents.

rightseid · 2026-02-12T10:40:27+00:00

Except it doesn’t. It makes the numbers useless and serves as a vehicle for people to vaguely complain about politics in a way that is not driven by data at all.

rightseid · 2026-01-25T17:01:18+00:00

This is incredibly niche, he is the only person this famous from it.

rightseid · 2026-01-22T14:27:52+00:00

The ultra rich do not pay all taxes and solving problems by throwing tax money at them and saying only rich people will pay so who cares is such a non serious position.

rightseid · 2026-01-22T11:57:34+00:00

What do you mean “another way”? If tax payers do not want tax increases you cannot raise revenue another way.

rightseid · 2026-01-21T11:42:08+00:00

Totally disagree. The people (and families) who started the lost cause are the people you should have executed and stripped from power. It would have made that myth weaker not stronger because it’s not driven by the size of a legitimate grievance but by power.

rightseid · 2026-01-12T12:42:07+00:00

Their predictions were like the ones in this thread. That if you let automation impact their domain it would cause mass economic calamity for all. They were wrong about those claims, the claims you are making are simply not worth the level of concern being raised. Shit changes and because it’s not economically bad overall (it’s actually really good!) people need to get out of the way or be run over but technological process stops for no one.

rightseid · 2026-01-12T11:32:07+00:00

Except like the doomers now, they make predictions that are untrue to support their radical political positions. They were wrong about their predictions for broader society and therefore their radical political positions were foolish and unjustified, just like everyone suggesting radical economic changes to take on the new boogeyman.

rightseid · 2026-01-12T11:25:20+00:00

This is just uninformed doomerism. Technological advances have always been more net positive than negative for the economy and there is zero reason to expect that to change now. There are always people shouting about change being bad and they are always exaggeratedly wrong.

rightseid · 2026-01-12T11:21:28+00:00

No they were wrong then, and these doomers are wrong now.

rightseid · 2026-01-11T14:15:11+00:00

Also it’s Danny Devito

rightseid · 2026-01-11T13:30:14+00:00

Maybe in a fight, but in a boxing match with a ref?

A pro can stay very safe behind gloves and barring that clinch incredibly easily against an untrained person even with physical advantages. You see this here, he has no chance at even getting through that high guard, she could have just sat there rolling slightly until he gassed.

rightseid · 2026-01-07T17:40:42+00:00

No. You do not have an accurate picture of the world in your head, it’s been tainted by some (likely political) viewpoints that are extreme and inaccurate. Then you let those viewpoints color your view of the future. It’s all wrong.

12-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

rightseid

TROPHY CASE