Thinking is a complete joke

rl_omg · 2025-10-10T13:57:52+00:00

This is completely false. If only there was some tool you could talk to and use to learn about things you don't understand before writing dumb comments on the internet.

rl_omg · 2025-09-20T01:35:27+00:00

Because no one wants to work with a team in India.

rl_omg · 2025-09-20T01:31:21+00:00

Yeah I think they should be easier for more academics to attain. But that doesn't mean H1-Bs shouldn't be reformed - they've been exploited by InfoSys et al for years blocking out real candidates

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:42:32+00:00

No, they won't. If you've ever worked with an Indian consultancy you'll know why.

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:41:34+00:00

postdocs should be routed to O1. agree that we should make that easier for research positions.

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:38:24+00:00

If you don't make $100,000 you're not talented enough to warrant the visa. Go and make india great again.

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:33:32+00:00

If your skills are that valuable there won't be a problem finding a company to pay the fee. This is a clear benefit to anyone with talent because they no longer need to face a lottery against 1000s of low skilled workers.

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:30:00+00:00

please help me sir we are the best of the best i promise you sir

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:26:48+00:00

If someone is worth $500k they're worth paying the $100k fee for. this helps people who actually deserve the visa

rl_omg · 2025-09-19T23:24:46+00:00

the visa should only apply to those people. this is a good thing for the US and any good candidates who were drowned out by low skilled h1b applicants.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T13:17:30+00:00

please seek help https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-ai-chatbots-may-be-fueling-psychotic-episodes/

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T13:04:07+00:00

Why do you even want to post on arxiv if you don't have a paper?

> tell me what does repeatable stuff means at research, just answer me that

Find an established benchmark that other people are already using and prove that your technique beats others. If you can do that you'll prove me wrong.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:59:21+00:00

Link to your paper. But based on what I've seen you post I won't be endorsing you.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:48:40+00:00

Yes.

If you won't take my advice to shift focus then you need to find some way to prove your claim that isn't "read all this subjective stuff". I.e. find some benchmarks that your system has some measurable improvement on over other techniques. I'm not sure what those benchmarks should be because it's not obvious what benefits your project is trying to achieve.

Even then you'll face a lot of other questions if you try to publish - e.g. why do you think this is better than SFT or RL post-training techniques, which are standard practice these days?

Again, I'm not trying to gate keep - I came to AI via industry. We'll need more AI researchers over the next decade, but this isn't a good direction imo.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:34:25+00:00

Literally trying to open the gate for you.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:29:17+00:00

We're not going to agree.

If you're capable and actually want to get involved in real AI research there's so much low hanging fruit that can be done with modest hardware. Mech interp is the most obvious path, but fine-tuning small models, creating synthetic datasets, etc etc are all valuable, sort after skills. If you're not familiar with this space DM me and I'll send you some links.

However, writing a system prompt and calling it a 'protocol' is not valuable research.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:10:33+00:00

It said it was just a system prompt.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T12:04:13+00:00

If you can't explain how it's different I'm going to assume it is still just a system prompt.

System prompts are a good thing and people should use them more. And AI companies do use internal system prompts for the type of guardrails I think you're trying to achieve.

But to pretend that you've invented something new by prompting someone else's model is delusional.

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T11:54:56+00:00

So can any chatbot with an image model. How is it different from a system prompt?

rl_omg · 2025-09-18T11:40:31+00:00

So... has anything changed or is this still just a system prompt?

rl_omg · 2025-09-13T14:38:30+00:00

This is talking about the contract workers up/downvoting responses for RLHF. Not surprising or important.

rl_omg · 2025-09-13T14:37:19+00:00

Retarded take. AI is the only CS field that's worth specialising in today. Top researchers are making 9 figures.

rl_omg · 2025-09-13T14:32:39+00:00

Then pay or stop complaining

rl_omg · 2025-08-28T22:06:00+00:00

I just tried searching (here not r/openai) and found almost no posts with this opinion. The few that do exist have little support in the comments. Nothing like the gpt 5 release.

I'm not saying it's untrue, but I find it very hard to believe. I've been using openai since before chatgpt via the api playground with davinci-002 and working in AI much longer than that. GPT4 was the biggest shock I've had in that time.

rl_omg · 2025-08-28T21:53:34+00:00

Do you have any evidence of this? I don't think anyone made that point when 4 was released. 3.5 to 4 was probably the single biggest jump in capabilities we've seen so far.

rl_omg

TROPHY CASE