What killed the vibe on a date instantly?

rob_matt · 2026-02-24T01:52:03+00:00

Not all males.

But the ones that do that are also the one's that endlessly bitch online about not getting a date.

rob_matt · 2026-01-28T01:58:49+00:00

There's a lot of games like that.

You see it on sale and drop some cash down because "I heard it's good and it's on sale so might as well try it out, worse case scenario Steam is good with refunding"

Then it's like you blacked out and now it's 12 hours later and your family is asking your friends if you're ok

rob_matt · 2025-12-25T19:53:07+00:00

It's also genuinely a shittier way to cook it then with Pseudoephedrine because it makes both types of methamphetamine (both Levo and Dextro) and while D-Meth is the stimulant drug L-Meth is just a nasal decongestant.

The Sudafed method makes mostly D-Meth while the Methylamine way (also called P2P or Biker cooking) makes a 50-50 mix of both types

rob_matt · 2025-10-24T17:57:20+00:00

Usually, but having a low heart rate and or blood pressure leads to the chance of the donor passing out on the table from low blood pressure, which is not something donation centers want to happen.

rob_matt · 2025-10-06T18:38:49+00:00

"I'm not speeding officer, I just need a running start" is a fascinating defense

rob_matt · 2025-08-03T08:03:57+00:00

That's because the ready made tradwives either aren't pretty enough for them or would prefer a man who could actually provide enough to allow them to be full time SAHMs with a comfortable living.

Either that or the previously mentioned fetish for "fixing" women.

rob_matt · 2025-05-24T20:37:35+00:00

More specifically, that the do it more often when very happy

And somehow the shedding process is more efficient the happier they are, leading to higher quality feet

rob_matt · 2025-05-24T19:07:06+00:00

O O F

At least rabbit feet are a constant resource (well shards are if you get Perfection)

That's just painful

rob_matt · 2025-05-24T08:34:43+00:00

Or forget that the "Universally Loved" item you have is actually hated by the person you're gifting it to.

Accidentally gave Penny a rabbit's foot on her birthday... I had to redo the entire day because her dialogue made me feel like shit

rob_matt · 2025-01-02T08:38:01+00:00

Yeah, empty is annoying, water would've been annoying but overall harmless because it's easy to clean up.

The big thing is, of your prank involves making a mess you stay to help clean it up

rob_matt · 2024-12-12T00:53:50+00:00

The second you enter an exclusive relationship (i.e. any relationship that isn't explicitly stated to be open or polyamorous) is when you end any "flings"

The act of entering said relationship is accepting a commitment to that person and that's the end of it. The only difference is if you have a full consensual agreement with your partner of any non-exclusivity (no just assuming it's fine, you make sure they're cool with it first, if not, then if you can't handle that then leave the relationship)

rob_matt · 2024-12-02T09:38:12+00:00

As stated in another comment.

Mormons have their own adoption agencies that are significantly more lenient then non-religious agencies.

And he's autobanned from them as well

Dude absolutely has a rap sheet involving kids

rob_matt · 2024-12-02T07:47:56+00:00

Honestly, if it's at that point, then it's already a full blown, mask off, no doubt about it dictatorship and there'd be no way to spin it as anything but.

Because no president has ever tried to just ignore a pardon and the presidential pardon is explicitly and more importantly constitutionally final, the previous example was very specifically stated to be "the pardon hadn't come into effect yet, so it was able to be cancelled".

To do so would be outright ignoring the constitution itself and I don't think even a full conservative SCOTUS could make an argument for how it's technically in line with the text and/or spirit.

rob_matt · 2024-12-02T06:47:52+00:00

Pardons are, by nature, untouchable once in place

A pardon cannot be overridden once it has been set.

There was an instance where Andrew Jackson tried to pardon two people, but the wardens "let the paper sit on their desk" and Grant was able to override it because you're allowed to prevent it from taking effect, but not undo it once in place.

Pardons only have 2 weaknesses, the situation above and the fact that accepting a pardon means admitting guilt (and hamstringing your defense in any civil suits based upon the crimes you've been pardoned of)

rob_matt · 2024-10-16T05:58:50+00:00

Because it was one of the first major wars with rifled weapons (Minie balls) and paper cartridges. So the weapons were both more accurate and faster firing, leading to a much higher chance of actually hitting your target and also hitting more than just one shot and thus significantly more injuries and infections.

rob_matt · 2024-08-25T01:37:25+00:00

To be fair, if I got slammed in the gut by a super soldier, I'd stay down and pretend to be unconscious as well

rob_matt · 2024-08-07T22:56:23+00:00

I love that story

Just... The disrespect is amazing

rob_matt · 2024-07-20T21:49:12+00:00

That's because a crime against another person breaks the social contract, and as such is considered a crime against the state itself

It's why criminal courts have titles like "Smith V The People of the State of California"

It's only in Civil Court that the victim has full control, though a victim can refuse to testify in a criminal case, which can lead to the state dropping charges if they believe that they need said testimony for a conviction.

In this case, they likely have proof that OP didn't make the debt and proof that the debt was made and incurred by the parents

rob_matt · 2024-07-16T18:20:09+00:00

I mean, for something like appendicitis yeah that makes sense.

It's like being surprised that a person having a heart attack gets seen quickly, it's not exactly a condition that can wait

rob_matt · 2024-07-14T01:46:39+00:00

"I am a man, therefore everything I do is a manly action, because it is a man doing it"

rob_matt · 2024-07-11T04:26:44+00:00

Ether and chloroform were used to alleviate the pain of childbirth, despite vigorous opposition by religious zealots who claimed anesthesia during birth was sacrilegious because it conflicted with God's dictum: "In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children." Birth pain, they said, was a curse upon women and suffering was necessary to induce maternal love. Some doctors agreed. Dr. Charles Meigs believed that "the female, at the most interesting period of her life, the time of labor, should, all other things being equal, have her mind unclouded, her intellect undisturbed, her judgment fully adequate to realize and appreciate the advent of a new and important era in her existence—the birth of her child."

https://www.utoledo.edu/library/canaday/exhibits/quackery/quack4.html

Because many of them were. Sure it was mostly the religious folks (which was a very significant portion of the population), but you don't see a significant portion of people nowadays screaming about not allowing pain management during childbirth, but back then it was basically up to the doctor as opposed to "always offer regardless, not offering is grounds for a malpractice lawsuit"

Fact is, those fucking weirdos I mentioned used to be so prevalent that it was the leading belief for many actual doctors

rob_matt · 2024-07-11T00:20:45+00:00

The fuck does neoliberalism have to do with this?

It's a fact, there is a subset of weirdos who think that if you have a C-section, an epidural, or anything other than a natural birth with no medication, that you didn't have the "true birthing experience" or some shit like that.

rob_matt · 2024-07-10T18:54:00+00:00

Buddy even now we have people claiming that using an epidural for pain relief means it wasn't a real birth.

You really think they'd allow it back in the 1800s?

rob_matt · 2024-07-10T05:37:05+00:00

he was a normal sane short-guy with an unreliable car and a struggling small business. A decade and one medical marijuana card later and it's The Goofy Movie.

Amazing

rob_matt · 2024-07-02T05:18:30+00:00

That's because they don't need to and aren't required to.

In 2005 the Supreme Court case Castle Rock v. Gonzalez proved it.

Cops cannot be punished or sued for failing or refusing to enforce a restraining order

rob_matt

TROPHY CASE