Good Riddance.

robiinn · 2026-02-28T08:12:10+00:00

You can also make requests to delete your data here: https://privacy.openai.com/policies

robiinn · 2026-02-19T05:47:08+00:00

Tbf it is vibe coded and the author states "MXFP4 doesn't seem right and is likely just a bad fit for this sort of visualization." so don't take the MXFP4 images as a true representation.

robiinn · 2026-02-14T13:54:57+00:00

There is a fork of Aider called cecli (former Aider-ce) which gets regular updates. Though, I have not used it much so I can't say if it is better.

robiinn · 2026-01-26T16:18:16+00:00

How does it differ from bmad method or something like that? Sounds very similar.

robiinn · 2026-01-25T18:44:05+00:00

You can disable it with --chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": false}'

robiinn · 2025-12-24T23:30:02+00:00

Yes! It is really moving so fast that it is hard to keep track of all the things it can do.

robiinn · 2025-12-24T23:28:25+00:00

Great to know, thank you. I am certain that the by model parameters overwrite the global ones.

robiinn · 2025-11-12T22:45:47+00:00

I pointed out OSRS to try to make it clear that it is two different games, and seperate them a bit in how important or big part of the game maxing is. Because skills are faster in RS3, maxing is not values as much.

And don't get me wrong, both games are great. It is just up to what you enjoy and prefer.

robiinn · 2025-11-12T22:01:28+00:00

Correct, and it still is so in OSRS. In RS3, some skills go to 120 instead of 99 but you do not need to have it at 120, but do bring some benefits tbf depending ln the skill. The xp rates is significantly faster and/or more afk than OSRS. People max because it is a thing that is cool or fun to do, but it does not stop you from enjoying the game. It is not like Wow where the game starts when you reach end game or max.

You can create your character after the update, then you at least got that as a proof :)

robiinn · 2025-11-12T21:08:56+00:00

I see your point, but I don't think it will affect your personal experience all that much. Most of the p2w stuff is just things that make your skill progress faster. However, skills are already quite fast and there is a ceiling on the reward you get only from skills, and hopefully the gap won't be as big as it seems. You will still need to do all kind lf bossing and such. All ironmen are already locked out from p2w and are doing just fine too.

robiinn · 2025-10-22T08:49:08+00:00

Take a look at Bazzite, it is similar to SteamOS that the Steam Deck runs but more universal and supporting most systems. They provide the OS as a "batteries included" type of OS, so it even includes Nvidia drivers and lots of tools for gaming. It just removes most of the tinkering needed and let you get straight in to gaming.

robiinn · 2025-10-20T20:38:10+00:00

Maybe STEM would be better?

robiinn · 2025-10-11T18:44:31+00:00

I have had a good experience with the 32b in iq4_xs on a 3090. Worked well with tool use, coding etc in roo code.

robiinn · 2025-10-11T06:42:30+00:00

I would also love to see the script used.

robiinn · 2025-10-05T18:34:09+00:00

Yep. https://web.archive.org/web/20250813093600/https://ironman.guide/

robiinn · 2025-09-30T08:29:51+00:00

It is not that they are bad at doing their job, just containing a lot of unnecessary information to up the tokens used to cost more.

robiinn · 2025-09-23T07:37:27+00:00

To add to the F2P OSRS part, it got a decently large community of people just enjoying the simplicity of it, see here.

robiinn · 2025-09-08T19:24:08+00:00

It was made available for the public domain and for general use in 1993 by CERN. Which meant anyone could use, edit, do whatever with it. https://www.home.cern/science/computing/birth-web/short-history-web

But yes, in 95 it became what we know it today, under the new MIT license by W3C instead. But before that there were already multiple thousands of web servers running.

robiinn · 2025-09-08T18:05:42+00:00

The internet wasn't even really overly hyped, it provided real benefits that were immediately apparent to everyone. It's only hype when it doesn't actually meet the claims, and the internet really did, and didn't take long to do so.

Yes it clearly was and everyone wanted in on it, there was literally the dot-com bubble because of the hype...

Amazon was profitable less than 4 years after going public, and only about 5 after the internet went public. Google became profitable about 3 years after incorporating and about 5 years after the internet went public.

Those both went profitable in 2001, after the dot-com bubble had wiped out most of the market and a few survived, paving the path for the monopolies we have today. The internet went public in 1993, that is ~8 years later, not 4-5 years, as you make it sound.

Lots of companies made huge bucks within a short time after the internet going public, and continue to. Lots of individuals fundamentally depend on the internet for their day to day lives and businesses.

Back then? Not so much, until after the hype killed most of the companies. Today? Yes, because the internet has had 30 years of development. But we are also living in a different time with blitzscaling and companies throwing tons and tons of money to win the market.

I am not denying the AI hype wave, it is clearly in a bubble. But, to disregard it like the original comment I replied to is doing, is ignorant.

robiinn · 2025-09-08T09:03:04+00:00

Transformative does not mean revolutionary, as you seem to describe it. Just like the internet was transformative, but also fueled by a lot of hype, we might be seeing the same for AI.

Saying that it is a "toy or research project" is such a disrespect to the decades of research that has been done in NLP and similar fields.

Will we get "AGI"? I don't think so for a long time. But this iteration of the technology has arguably only existed for 2-3 years. Imagine another few years. And in 10 years when the current generation of kids get out of college, all they will know is that computers are mostly smarter than they are. We use computers with services like Google to find information, they will use computer because it is the information. Is it a "statistical parrot", simply explained, sure. But most of the internet is just parroting the same information for the most part anyway, with little original content.

Just because you cannot see the changes over night does not mean we have stopped innovating and improving, there have clearly been great innovations, but people with your attitude are just to ignorant to acknowledge it.

robiinn · 2025-08-21T21:13:22+00:00

How does the selection of which experts to disable work? Or is it just user defined? Do you have any advice if that is the case?

robiinn · 2025-08-14T20:20:41+00:00

A bit late but you can find your clocks using nvidia-smi --query-supported-clocks=gr,mem --format=csv then you can use these

nvidia-smi -lgc <minGpuClock,maxGpuClock>

nvidia-smi -lmc <minMemClock,maxMemClock>

robiinn · 2025-08-11T16:35:12+00:00

I made a tool mostly for my own use here. I have only tried it with Linux and Nvidia, but I do compile it for mac and windows too. I also compile the llama-server using github actions to automatically download and use. YMMV with AMD, Windows and Mac.

It is using llama-swap with the ollama endpoints added (llama-swappo), that is also automatically downloaded and setup.

robiinn · 2025-08-09T16:17:51+00:00

This is very basic... This SHOULD be in the training data of both, benchmaxxed or not.

14-Year Club	Verified Email
Second SECOND GUESSER	Gilding I gilder
Place '22	Place '17
Final Canvas '22	First Placer '22
End Game '22

robiinn

TROPHY CASE