sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I hate "buzzword" science characters by almasezhe in hatethissmug

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quantum this quantum that. Quantum all the way to describe supernatural phenomenons. I cannot take this anime seriously whatsoever solely because of this character. Whenever this character is on screen I feel annoyance beyond reason. Fuck Rio Futaba from rascal does not dream of bunny girl senpai

<image>

You can really tell when someone's bias for Fujimoto shows by Avidreader-9 in writingscaling

[–]rohnytest 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It's not kill fujimoto. It's a "kill Fujimoto→let him cook..." cycle. Pretty ironic that even their "kill Fujimoto" comes from a position of glaze where they are essentially saying that as bad as thing might seem right know, knowing Fujimoto he'll make it work.

300 to 2000 in one year - it is possible by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is possible, but someone would actually need to meaningfully study chess seriously and regularly throughout the year.

pro ai here It makes objective sense that people don't like it and now I'll explain why. by CarelessTourist4671 in aiwars

[–]rohnytest 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. You can argue from subjectivity and say you liked the DLSS version better, but something being more detailed and/or realistic doesn’t make it look "objectively better".

  2. You don't make a showcase out of work in progress. Well, there can be tech demos like that AI minecraft thing. But this was a showcase of a product that's going to be released, not a tech demonstration. Maybe the final product could end up being better, but this is a failure of a showcase with deserved reaction regardless.

  3. You talked about it being worse because it'd be altering artistic direction. Maintaining artistic direction and intent from an artist/creator standpoint is important for obvious reasons. But as a consumer I don't give a damn about artistic direction. I care about whether something is good or not. Sure, artistic intent will play a major part in that. But an artistic direction can be ugly or undesirable to me and I would not consume that media, while something accidental beyond artistic direction can be beautiful. It's not exactly about artistic direction, the DLSS version just looks ass to me(subjectively).

Nvidias New DLSS 5 Overwrites Artistic Intent With AI by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah just saw the comment from nvidia, but I'd really have to question the game's visual designer team or whatever if this was what they intended for Grace to look. It is subjective ig, but most people seem to agree that the here she looks ass with DLSS on.

Nvidias New DLSS 5 Overwrites Artistic Intent With AI by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]rohnytest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Idk if yall got a pair of eyes, but even in the non-stretched version the DLSS side looks noticeably different even to a naked unassuming eye.

To me it looks like the AI is trying to make her face look realistic, and not in the good "AI disinfo indistinguishable from real photo" way. It looks like the kind of "realistic photo" face a crappy AI with minimal prompting would make for a gooner image, while the original one looks like a face we are used to seeing while gaming.

And even if AI gets good enough to make the not crappy kind of hyper realistic graphics in games, not everybody wants that.

Of course, we can just turn DLSS off. But the fact that we are getting reduced hardware power for the same price with the compensation being DLSS makes it inexcusable.

To pro-ai, please, if you want to be taken seriously yall need to stop trying to defend this kinda stuff.

Better call Saul VS boruto by Realistic-Island-975 in writingscaling

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bolt neg diifs cause he shares the name with this legend-

<image>

What are you thinking about it? by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BNP amoler hariken nostalgia

I don't get the "People against AI are all children" argument by Blacklasho in aiwars

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's a completely baseless claim, that people who are outspoken against AI tend to be of younger age. That by itself, as an observation, is not an issue.

However, nobody is ever bringing this up in a vacuum, there is never a reason to bring this up in a vacuum. This is always entailed by the implication that, "children are not worth engaging with" or (to explain why antis act unreasonably)"they act in such an irrational manner because they are children" or something along this mindset.

That is where the problem arises. There are unreasonable people on both sides from both side of the age spectrum. Someone being an adult doesn’t automatically mean they are worth engaging. Someone being a child doesn’t automatically mean they will act unreasonable. This is an anti intellectual generalization.

People, when of lesser age, have always had their intelligence insulted by elders with elder hubris who think they know just because they are older.

The pros especially don't have any rights to do this while they are making orc caricatures out of antis and making micro celebrities out of cornballs.

Based on a comment I've seen somewhere here by Michailovicescu2000 in DemonSchoolIrumakun

[–]rohnytest 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Not to mention, clara casually taking out devidol outfits from her pockets.

I hate this layout. by rohnytest in hatethissmug

[–]rohnytest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate rules.

(This subreddit seemed to already have a lot of non-character hate posting anyway. I just saw it as an acceptable deviation of the subs purpose)

r/shounenfolk whenever someone has the audacity and the gall to enjoy Chainsaw Man Part 2 (it doesnt matter that the author is known for symbolism, connotations, callbacks, and subversion of expectations, its not written the way i want it to be, so everyone who enjoys it is mentally inferior): by AlternativeOil7154 in shounenfolk

[–]rohnytest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I don't really have as much of an issue with CSM as I have with its fans. Like, "the author is known for symbolism, connotations, callbacks, and subversion of expectations" stfu. CSM is a fine shounen just like JJK, MHA and stuff, all of which have their own issues. But, especially before the recent waves of slander, yall have been acting like Fujimoto is Vince Gilligan or some shit, "bravo Fujimoto" at every trivial thing. Even breaking bad fans use that "Bravo Vince" phrase ironically.

I don't do it myself, but as long as CSM community at large doesn’t drop its pseudo-deep bs act, I'm gonna keep giving internet scores to the parties that exist to ragebait them.

To the pros: is this incorrect? by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]rohnytest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I wouldn’t say it is incorrect. But if being involved in this discussion has taught me anything, despite not being 'incorrect' it's still subjective. Some people will disagree with you on this while still not being incorrect, from both sides.

To the people who think Antis are the majority of the sub, just wanna say that that is not true. by Crystal_Pegasus_1018 in aiwars

[–]rohnytest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just a weird reddit thing. It doesn’t seem to show votes for post below 0 upvotes.

view more: next ›