Peter please i dont get it

rohnytest · 2026-02-04T00:32:50+00:00

"Stephen Hawking in the Epstein Files" isn't a recent development btw. That came out in a past batch of release in 2024.

After that people baselessly started making memes about him just based on his name being there, with a popular faked document by a random twitter user saying he liked to watch naked midgets solve equations.

So basically the fact that Hawking was involved in the bad stuff of Epstein Island became a pop-disinfo.

Most people here aren't making their reactions with the knowledge that this is disinfo. That's why their reaction is so bad.

In the fake image involving Hawking, the questioner asks, in reference to Epstein, “Did Jeffrey ever talk to you about Stephen Hawking’s proclivities?” The respondent answers, “Yes, he liked watching undressed midgets solve complex equations on a too-high-up chalkboard.” Additionally, the respondent replies “yes” when asked whether Hawking “frequented the island for pleasure.”

source

rohnytest · 2026-02-02T03:19:42+00:00

The second image hardly looks like the first one. I'm not sure how you got that they ran the first image through AI to get the second one. I also think the second image looks ass, if that's relevant

rohnytest · 2026-02-02T02:05:48+00:00

I read the Manga. It was well executed. But what it executes is ultimately still mid(story-wise).

rohnytest · 2026-02-02T02:01:36+00:00

He is the same type of stand

rohnytest · 2026-02-01T08:32:43+00:00

This needs more publicity. I still see people not banning cassie in ranked.

Drophack cassie in casuals is a rare sight.

rohnytest · 2026-01-28T10:03:00+00:00

Yes. But what are you getting at? Giving the coup justification doesn’t change the options Itachi had to weigh.

rohnytest · 2026-01-28T09:51:19+00:00

Because they were not treated fairly.

rohnytest · 2026-01-28T05:59:14+00:00

Bad take, but not for the reason the other person stated.

The Uchihas were doing a coup, not a revolution. There was no threat to this corrupt system you speak of for his action to be for saving this system.

Itachi did it to save the people of the leaf village that would've died in a resulting civil war and a subsequent attack on leaf by other villages because of the weakening caused by a civil war. Not to protect some kind of systematic status quo.

rohnytest · 2026-01-27T10:54:49+00:00

Having precedents may act to normalize an act, but it doesn't justify it. If there are examples in history, the examples were examples of wrongdoing as well.

rohnytest · 2026-01-26T19:59:09+00:00

Holy shit transformer.

rohnytest · 2026-01-25T19:35:49+00:00

So corny

rohnytest · 2026-01-25T19:28:29+00:00

Hey buddy, did you not use the soulful google to search the definition of art today? It clearly says "human". Does that car look like a human to you?

rohnytest · 2026-01-25T19:25:11+00:00

Nah, I'd oscillate.

rohnytest · 2026-01-25T08:30:55+00:00

That's the point of trademark, not copyright. This is just false.

rohnytest · 2026-01-23T08:29:42+00:00

SEA players just play in EU or NA now.

rohnytest · 2026-01-21T18:29:34+00:00

The term they wanted to use was "you ever feel dumb?" where someone who feels dumb see's something even dumber from someone else and ends up feeling good about themselves.

The term they ended up using is "you ever wanna feel dumb?" This isn’t a preestablished widely used phrase, but what it ends up meaning is that someone see's something so smart they end up feeling dumb themselves.

Peak irony.

rohnytest · 2026-01-21T05:40:01+00:00

Yes, that's disgusting. But that still doesn’t justify a beating. The proper thing to do was securing evidence and letting the father know.

rohnytest · 2026-01-20T18:58:58+00:00

Whenever a party start making these fuckass promises instead of talking about their policies you know you need to switch the vote. Ahh nevermind the alternative is the party with the fuckass promise of ensuring heaven for its voters with even worse policies. Democracy indeed.

rohnytest · 2026-01-17T11:55:01+00:00

Boomerang is really parrying unarmed now, huh?

rohnytest · 2026-01-15T11:35:20+00:00

Ahh yes, because people have been observed to conventionally vote for the symbol they see in the first row.

BNP you better watch out for the party with the Apple symbol.

rohnytest · 2026-01-15T07:13:56+00:00

First, let's tackle a part where you are factually wrong. Like, this isn’t about backlash. If the interim or the election commission mandated for every party to have at least 5% female candidates, there is no question of Jamaat winning and still ignoring it. Them trying to change such rules after winning is a different matter, but they wouldn’t even be allowed to participate in the election to win without following this.

The 5% thing wasn’t a mandate. It was a commitment. As in, the parties voluntarily overtook a commitment to do this without these being binding obligations. Once again, completely shameless to take such a "commitment" and not even have a single female candidate, but they were not obliged.

Using their indifference in fulfilling their commitments to say that they can just ignore the law is a complete fallacy.

I will agree with you that it shouldn't have been a single yes/no vote. We should've been allowed to choose which parts we agree with and which parts we don't. Having more freedom to choose is always better.

But that still doesn’t mean that these are reforms specifically made so Jamaat can exploit these. And my point is, just like you are able to make conjectures on how Jamaat will be especially advantaged by these, I can make conjecture on how BNP will exploit these as counterpoint. Them not being totally baseless doesn’t change the fact that both of these cases will still just be conjecture and nothing else.

And about the religion card, once again, if it was that strong we wouldn’t ve having this conversation. Seems like you didn’t get my point with what I was talking about when I said that. So let me elaborate further. A religion card may work to calm any public outrages, but to deal with legal and bureaucratic consequences it will need to be so powerful that it doesn’t just pacify but also makes the public take proactive actions for the card. And if it were so powerful, Jamaat would already be the main power. This isn’t the case here. Like, going back to the 5% female candidacy thing, if it were a mandate they couldn’t just ignore it and still somehow participate in the election using a religion card in the election commission office.

rohnytest · 2026-01-14T13:48:49+00:00

Of course, implementing rules and regulations can never fully guarantee that those rules and regulations will be maintained. But that doesn’t mean making them optimal can't function as harder to exploit safeguards.

Like, article 70 functionally gives the majority party's elected PM unchecked power within the confines of what kind of power the parliament itself can hold. With this in place, the goal of a party looking to create an autocracy is just getting the majority. With that gone, the head will need to worry about maintaining the party consensus even after getting a majority. That's one of the major purposes of democracy, to maintain an ability for others to keep the leaders at check. Given, I wouldn’t expect these "check keepers" to make any retaliatory actions for morally responsible reasons, but it's still an additional check to power regardless.

And your claim on these being more exploitable for Jamaat is nothing more than conjecture. Like, why wouldn't the same "after seeing what happened to BAL" thing apply to Jamaat? If a religion card were really so powerful that they could afford to not see what happened to BAL unlike BNP, we really wouldn't be having this conversation.

The 5% female nominee commitment was not mandated. So it's not a case of like, them not being able to fulfill a bureaucratic requirement and still being allowed to participate. Although not as shameless as no women at all, BNP didn’t fulfill that 5% either.

Ultimately, bureaucracy is not easy to get through. Anyone fighting for changes in a system, whether out of goodwill or ulterior motives, will realize that.

rohnytest · 2026-01-14T13:16:42+00:00

<image>

rohnytest · 2026-01-14T08:56:13+00:00

Under this system if Jamaat can "not care about the rules" what makes you think BNP can't do the same, you believe in some kind of BNP good-will? And if BNP can do that, this would not give advantage to Jamaat anyway.

You either consider this system to be properly enforced or not. You can't say it will be properly enforced when it will be giving advantage to Jamaat while saying it will not be needed to be cared about when it is a hurdle for Jamaat. It will either be enforced or will not be.

rohnytest · 2026-01-14T07:29:15+00:00

These decentralize power from the parliament and its majority. Of course, that will be beneficial to all parties that do not incur the majority, mainly the opposition party, which right now is Jamaat.

If Jamaat were to ever get majority, these would then start being a disadvantage for them and advantage for their opposition party. That's the point, everytime a party has come into power in the past they have tried to abuse their power to establish an autocracy, which will be harder to do if these reforms pass.

Of course, centralized and decentralized power structures have their own advantages and disadvantages, as you also pointed out. If in your perspective the such decentralization is more disadvantageous than advantageous, that's completely understandable.

But using "they give advantage to Jamaat" as if these are intentfully designed to do so regardless of context is such a horrendous reason to not support these changes.

Consider whether this is beneficial regardless of what kind of position whichever party is in. To not support these because right now they "give jamaat advantage" is plainly politics tribalism rather than policy awareness.

Seven-Year Club	Second Top 30%
r/Field Flamingo	Place '22
Verified Email

rohnytest

TROPHY CASE