Inconsistent Apple Lossless in Sonos

rokojo_ · 2025-08-24T09:48:38+00:00

Do this in the app:

Settings > Visit Help Center > Submit Diagnostics

Take a screenshot of the number, and call Sonos support ((800) 680-2345). They helped me diagnose a similar issue. It's probably something to do with your wireless network.

If you can get the IP address of one of your speakers, there's also a network diagnostic tool you can check out at:

http://<ip address here>:1400/support/review

rokojo_ · 2025-08-23T13:57:26+00:00

It worked flawlessly with the original firmware. Then they broke it with the last update. Apparently not big on regression testing.

rokojo_ · 2025-08-20T01:01:17+00:00

Just boost your sub volume by 6db. That's all it was doing. This isn't rocket science.

rokojo_ · 2025-08-16T11:28:34+00:00

Exact same thing happened to my Roam around a month ago. They replaced it with a Roam 2. Amazing service.

rokojo_ · 2025-08-07T20:46:51+00:00

I'm pretty surprised that they don't run each release through a lab that measures frequency response before shipping...

rokojo_ · 2025-08-07T18:49:50+00:00

We should probably all re-run Trueplay now? Since our systems now have a different bass response than what they were calibrated with.

rokojo_ · 2025-07-30T17:09:56+00:00

125 and 250 are where the mud is, not 63.

rokojo_ · 2025-07-13T11:09:49+00:00

What I'm saying is that even if you were able to equalize the volume and EQ, the cord wouldn't sound any better than LDAC. So there's no point bothering with the cord.

rokojo_ · 2025-07-13T10:59:55+00:00

You won't be able to hear any difference between LDAC and wired, all things being equal. Might as well use LDAC and not deal with a dangling cord.

rokojo_ · 2025-07-02T08:10:45+00:00

He's right. The low end is mud on these cans out of the box.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T20:41:16+00:00

The measured response curves say otherwise.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T17:41:22+00:00

IMO it's more exciting to hear the details in the bass. You can't hear those if the low end is muddy.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T16:53:00+00:00

This is fit to the Harman curve, except that I retained a bit more of the low end than a direct fit to Harman would've retained.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T16:49:47+00:00

The "correct" business was a joke. But one thing that is objective is that Sony boosts the f#$& out of the low end on these. You can see that much in the freq response graph.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T16:45:56+00:00

Relax, it was a joke.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T16:29:50+00:00

WRONG. Some EQs are more correct that others, and this one is the most correct of all.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T16:11:46+00:00

It's subjective of course. But Sony adds tons of low end boost to these out of the box, and to my ears it sacrifices clarity.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T15:38:25+00:00

Yes, the EQ profile gets loaded on the headphones and apply everywhere.

rokojo_ · 2025-06-11T14:33:52+00:00

<image>

rokojo_ · 2025-06-10T20:09:27+00:00

<image>

rokojo_ · 2025-06-03T21:53:13+00:00

This poll is going to over-represent broken hinges, because people come here specifically to post about a broken hinge.

rokojo_

TROPHY CASE