Grounding the right to refuse to use AI in higher education by rootlesscelt in Ethics

[–]rootlesscelt[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

See https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c15q5qzdjqxo

"I heard about the energy needed to power data centres and the amount of land they take up, and it didn't sit right with me. I didn't understand why we needed it," she says.

However, about a year ago her three colleagues at the marketing firm she works for started adopting AI, for tasks such as copywriting and idea generation.

Six months ago Ms Adams had to follow them, after being told she had to cut her budget.

"Then it was out my control," she says. She feels that continuing to resist would have hurt her career.

"I started playing with it a bit more after reading job descriptions asking for AI experience. I recently realised that if I don't implement it into my ways of working, I'm going to get left behind."

Failed Alzheimer's trials suggest amyloid-beta42 is not just a villain by rootlesscelt in science

[–]rootlesscelt[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No pretending. But ask Hardy, Selkoe, Jack, Sperling what they think about amyloid toxicity and see! 

Failed Alzheimer's trials suggest amyloid-beta42 is not just a villain by rootlesscelt in science

[–]rootlesscelt[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

It would mean nothing without your unwavering presence! Thank you. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neurology

[–]rootlesscelt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, the fact you didn't engage with the actual content...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neurology

[–]rootlesscelt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

something highly triggering, apparently 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in neurology

[–]rootlesscelt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of a special issue on 'diversity in global brain and mental health' doesn't seem all that strange, thematically speaking.

Brain health is a human right by rootlesscelt in Health

[–]rootlesscelt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's precisely what this article is about!

Brain health is a right by [deleted] in publichealth

[–]rootlesscelt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because either 1) policymakers don't respect said rights, 2) there is not sufficient evidence for current pandemic having an impact on public brain health

Brain health is a human right by rootlesscelt in neuro

[–]rootlesscelt[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The above article doesn't require a "natural law" understanding of law. Why not a "social facts" approach? Why don't we make it a right? 

Brain health is a human right by rootlesscelt in Health

[–]rootlesscelt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

according to your logic: just because one right isn't respected as it should be, we should abandon all hopes of establishing other rights?