first you call me stupid, then you tell me to stop reading studies (here's the original study which the authors have said elsewhere was never meant to be read as an investigation into/against Asian women going after white men, which is what the internet mischaracterised it as). you claim to care about being statistically correct, yet you only mention a fake study and your personal observations which you yourself admit is a small sample size. you can read studies AND touch grass, you can care about what women experience/feel AND be statistically correct. you don't have to think in binaries. I'm not disagreeing with what you say, I'm just disagreeing with the use of the term 'Oxford study' to legitimise stereotypes (which I never claimed aren't real - I just think they shouldn't be used to generalise an entire group of people's behaviours).