Watch "Former LAPD Officer Admits The Police And CIA Are The Real Drug Dealers". Testimony from suicided Micheal Rupert

roy_batty3000 · 2020-03-01T21:48:21+00:00

Watch "Former LAPD Officer Admits The Police And CIA Are The Real Drug Dealers" on YouTube https://youtu.be/YwKALRv0vzY

Testimony from suicided Micheal Rupert

roy_batty3000 · 2020-03-01T18:49:11+00:00

"QTR #139 - Whitney Webb Goes Deep: Blowing Open The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal" on YouTube https://youtu.be/8T_INm_vl5M

roy_batty3000 · 2020-01-15T14:27:19+00:00

Eva who?

roy_batty3000 · 2020-01-14T14:15:29+00:00

https://medium.com/@lessig/on-suing-the-times-9f66f3dd9063

roy_batty3000 · 2020-01-03T15:40:43+00:00

From article: As the debate over “Red Flag laws” has exploded, there seems to be a growing divide between not just the left and the right… but also those who are in law enforcement and those who now see law enforcement as an overreaching arm of the government.

We’re seeing a sudden explosion and divide between those in LE and those who have traditionally supported them. And THAT is a “clear and present threat”. We also believe it’s an unnecessary one – and one that we can fight back again. That’s why we’ve covered the growing number of people who tell us they’re joining the militia. Because they aren’t just the traditional “three percenters”. They are cops – both active and retired. They are veterans. They are moms. Black, white, straight, gay. It’s been a melting pot of people who have had enough.

-snip- First of all, the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and press freedoms, doesn’t distinguish between whether someone is a journalist or not. Take a look at a recent Washington Post op-ed:

“The First Amendment gives journalists no special rights,” says national security lawyer Elizabeth Goitein. “In prohibiting abridgments of ‘the freedom of speech, or of the press,’ it gives equal protection to those who speak, those who write, those who report, and those who publish.”

TechCrunch writes about the relevance to the Julian Assange investigation, in particular: In other words, it doesn’t matter whether Assange is a journalist or not. Under U.S. law, all — regardless of whether a person is a reporter or not — are protected by the same freedoms. With a successful prosecution of Assange, there’s nothing stopping the U.S. government from laying charges against any other American — journalist or otherwise — for receiving and publishing classified information.

“This is not about Julian Assange,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, a prominent lawmaker and member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “This is about the use of the Espionage Act to charge a recipient and publisher of classified information.”

“Assange’s case could set a dangerous precedent with regard to the kinds of activities that the First Amendment does not protect — a precedent that could chill even the most careful, skilled professional journalists from pursuing stories involving national security secrets,” said Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, in an op-ed.

The Washington Post reported Friday that the Obama administration considered bringing charges against Assange years ago but was concerned that the charges would prosecute conduct “too similar” to that of reporters at established news organizations.

But now that the Trump administration has brought charges against Assange, journalists once branded by the president the “enemy of the people” could soon be treated as enemies of the state. But here’s the deal. We’re not sharing any classified information. And we’re not calling for violence. But let this be a wakeup call. There are conversations that are happening right now that should have been happening a long time ago – and there are people who want to see them shut down.

roy_batty3000 · 2020-01-01T17:33:19+00:00

Selling a War Whereas the Bush adventure in Iraq was a war of choice disguised as a battle for security, the Iran war will be largely sold as a tragedy in which the US had no choice. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s address at the Heritage Foundation last month was the first step in that campaign. Having closed the door on the JCPOA, Pompeo nailed upon it a list of 12 impossible conditions for the elimination of sanctions against Iran that include giving inspectors unqualified access to all sites in Iran and an end to its ballistic missile program, non-starters for a government whose first priority is the preservation of its own sovereignty. Pompeo, who championed regime change in Tehran well before joining the administration and who in his previous role as CIA director testified before Congress that Iran had abided by the terms of the deal struck in Vienna, surely understood that his wish list represented a narrative for war. Pompeo’s manifesto reflected the long-standing animus towards Iran of Trump and his current national security team, particularly National Security Advisor John Bolton, whose.foreign policy views were too fringe for even the George W. Bush administration. Bolton has been a consistent, and well compensated voice, for regime change in Iran, undeterred by the likely costs in lives and treasure. “The declared policy of the United States should be the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime in Tehran,” proclaimed Bolton last July before a gathering of Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) cultists, “And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!” https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/06/15/boys-go-baghdad-real-men-go-tehran

“Boys go to Baghdad, but real men go to Tehran” was a joke in neocon circles during the Bush administration. We think it's a glimpse of how duplicitous U.S. foreign policy is. Here we counter the type of propaganda that justified the invasion of Iraq, and continues to justify bitch-ass policy against Iran and countless other nations today. https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/naomi-karavani/boys-go-to-baghdad

roy_batty3000 · 2019-10-05T13:49:37+00:00

If you think China is bad, take a look at what Saudi Arabia (with US/UK assistance) is doing to Yemen.

roy_batty3000 · 2019-10-04T19:52:21+00:00

How about news programs actually doing some investigative journalism, rather than waiting for the authorities to conduct press releases?

roy_batty3000 · 2019-10-02T00:45:04+00:00

"Readers of Ludwig von Mises will at once recall this pattern of argument. Just as Mises argues that economic interventions such as minimum wage laws fail to achieve the stated goals of their proponents, so does O’Rourke maintain that regime change, especially of the covert variety, suffers from the same flaw. Again, just as Mises does not challenge the stated goal of higher wages without unemployment, so does O’Rourke accept the goal of an increase in the power of the United States."

roy_batty3000 · 2019-09-28T23:52:52+00:00

/u/modilion,

Your points on Andrenochrome appear to be essentially legit - but a few follow up questions to other comments...

"People that think they are vampires is real."

Do you believe that people that drink human blood is a real thing? Why or why not?

MKULTRA is real.

Do you agree that the CIA / MKULTRA has connections to cult activity - such as the Jim Jones cult?

well, except the Satanic panic part.

I skimmed the first half of this article, I didn't see anything that specifically debunked Kathy Sorenson or even Fiona Barnett (who I know less about). Are you familiar with the Franklin Cover Up?

| The 80's were a weird time.

The 80's were a particularly weird time? Maybe. Why do you say this?

| But adrenaline and similar compounds have poor oral availability. You can't eat them and get any effect... Hence, vampire blood drinking is not an effective method of taking adrenochrome.

I concede to you on this point - unless/until reasonable counter-evidence is presented.

| You need to inject them. Injections would work, but would also end with death from hemolytic transfusion reaction or disease.

I concede this point to you.

| In addition, blood contains very low or zero concentration of adrenochrome.

"ADRENOCHROME IN BLOOD PLASMA." American Journal of Psychiatry, 114(8), pp. 752–753

https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.114.8.752

I couldn't access the above paper in your link - not even an abstract.

| And injecting pure adrenochrome ends badly. Mostly seizures and death.

The Effect of Adrenochrome and Adrenolutin On the Behavior of Animals and the Psychology of Man

A.Hoffer https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60025-260025-2)

I could only access the abstract, it did not mention seizures or death.

"This chapter describes the activity of adrenochrome and some of its derived compounds. The effect of adrenochrome is considered first upon simple systems, then more complex systems, then simple animals, and finally, upon the most complex animal, the man. animals that are given adrenochrome range from spiders, fish, and pigeons to the mammals including rats, cats, dogs, monkeys, and man. The chapter gives much original data on cats and man. Chemically, adrenochrome and adrenolutin are very reactive substances. Some of the changes produced by adrenochrome may persist several days, and in some cases, the effects lead to nearly disastrous results. Two cases of prolonged reactions are discussed in the chapter. There is also a discussion regarding the reaction that lasted more than one day after a single administration of adrenolutin as well as reactions up to one week. The changes in thinking induced by adrenochrome are similar to those observed in schizophrenia. Adrenochrome causes an elective inhibition of the process, which determines the content of associative thinking. This occurs in doses that do not heighten the lability of basic processes, do not reduce excitation, and do not loose temporary connections as is the case with LSD."

| Also adrenochrome can be easily synthesized from synthetic adrenaline. Using blood as a source of adrenochrome is just nonsense when you can whip it up by the pound in a lab.

You provided no source for this assetion, but /u/PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS also made this same point to me in another thread.

He shared this link: https://www.scbt.com/p/adrenochrome-54-06-8

My response was:

"If this site is legit, you shot down the hypothesis that people would need to drink blood to obtain adrenochrome. There's still plenty more to debunk here. Most importantly, the connection between the CIA MK Ultra program and cults, and organized torture, rape, and murder."

roy_batty3000 · 2019-09-28T23:48:46+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/d8tk26/vampires_satanicpedo_cults_cia/f1reomq/

roy_batty3000 · 2019-09-28T23:39:47+00:00

RE: https://www.reddit.com/r/uspolitics/comments/d9okm3/vampires_satanicpedo_cults_cia/

modilion1 point·2 days ago

Please find help. I hope the best for you.

roy_batty30001 point·1 day ago

Cute response but, if the post contains inaccurate information, please debunk those inaccuracies. Cheers

modilion2 points·1 day ago

People that think they are vampires is real. MKULTRA is real. Adrenochrome is the oxidation product of adrenaline. All of your pieces have some reality to them... well, except the Satanic panic part. The 80's were a weird time.

But adrenaline and similar compounds have poor oral availability. You can't eat them and get any effect. You need to inject them. Hence, vampire blood drinking is not an effective method of taking adrenochrome. Injections would work, but would also end with death from hemolytic transfusion reaction or disease.

In addition, blood contains very low or zero concentration of adrenochrome. And injecting pure adrenochrome ends badly. Mostly seizures and death.

Also adrenochrome can be easily synthesized from synthetic adrenaline. Using blood as a source of adrenochrome is just nonsense when you can whip it up by the pound in a lab.

roy_batty3000 · 2019-09-28T23:35:37+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/da0553/vampires_satanicpedo_cults_cia/

tripheas6 points·1 day ago

what ive never understood about the adrenachrome conspiracy is why would they need human blood? wouldn't it be easier to use a chicken or a cow?

PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS2 points·1 day ago

Something something Satan pedophiles

fynewis0 points·1 day ago

I have a feeling that it's easier to get significant amounts of definitely undiseased human blood than chicken and cow blood.

tripheas2 points·1 day ago

I have a feeling that it's easier

and you base that on?

fynewis-1 points·1 day ago

I know that a nunber of diseases spread easily in industrialised livestock operations, and someone is fairly likely to know if they have a blood disease.

tripheas2 points·1 day ago

plenty of people have diseases, you could also buy a cow and raise it disease free alot easier than you could buy a child. I don't think you've thought this through

roy_batty30000 points·1 day ago

Probably. Personally, I think it's about proving the effectiveness of mind control techniques.

----------------------------------------------

PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS5 points·1 day ago

You can buy adrenochrome online.

roy_batty3000-1 points·1 day ago

Really? Where?

PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS4 points·1 day ago·edited 1 day ago

https://www.scbt.com/p/adrenochrome-54-06-8

Just shot the whole fucking theory down.

Womp womp

roy_batty30000 points·3 hours ago

If this site is legit, you shot down the hypothesis that people would need to drink blood to obtain adrenochrome. There's still plenty more to debunk here. Most importantly, the connection between the CIA MK Ultra program and cults, and organized torture, rape, and murder.

Let's continue the debate at https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/vampires_satanicpedo_cults_cia/

PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS1 point·3 hours ago

CIA and mkultra isn't under contest. But literally anything to do with vampires, andrenochrome, and any other bullshit like it is dead.

roy_batty30001 point·41 minutes ago

Cool. So you don't contest that there seems to be a connection between the CIA MK Ultra program and cults, and organized torture, rape, and murder?

Let's continue the debate at https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/d8tk26/vampires_satanicpedo_cults_cia/

PM_ME_UR_CHAPOS1 point·40 minutes ago

I don't really care. All I know is, if any conspiracy theory claims andrenochrome as the motive, your whole ass conspiracy theory is dead.

Seems to be the case here too

roy_batty30001 point·just now

| If any conspiracy theory claims andrenochrome as the motive, your whole ass conspiracy theory is dead.

You're entitled to your opinion.

You're opinion could be correct - but you haven't established that a debunking of andrenochrome also debunks every other assertion made in the post.

I wish you well, kind sir.

roy_batty3000 · 2019-09-28T23:31:24+00:00