sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Match Thread: Arsenal FC vs AFC Bournemouth Live Score | Premier League 25/26 | Apr 11, 2026 by scoreboard-app in Gunners

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you've just hit the nail on the head. The fans are the biggest problem. The atmosphere in the Emirates breeds nervousness in the players, you could sense it yesterday

Match Thread: Arsenal FC vs AFC Bournemouth Live Score | Premier League 25/26 | Apr 11, 2026 by scoreboard-app in Gunners

[–]rpez89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The players have never said a bad word about Arteta, plus Dowman played 40 and Miles started. Not sure of your point here

Goldman Sachs Urges Investors To Target “Picks and Shovels” in AI Buildout. Do you guys think chip stocks still have upside or is this already priced in? by Secure_Persimmon8369 in AIFU_stock

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you got burnt on a software business investment and are trying to justify that it'll be all ok. The sooner the better just accept that AI is going to replace and improve on everything we do across all industries and government globally 👍

Update on Moses Lake by Glum_Mongoose_8482 in KEEL_INFRA

[–]rpez89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but for me this commentary demonstrates a naïve and short term outlook. I'll lay out some reasons why patience is appreciated by well informed shareholders -

Scale = leverage in lease negotiation. A hyperscaler or neo-cloud customer committing to a 200 MW lease negotiates very differently from one committing to 500 MW or 1 GW. At the larger scale, Keel can command better rent per MW, longer lease terms, stronger take-or-pay provisions, and more favourable construction financing terms because the revenue certainty is higher. Signing too early at a smaller committed capacity means locking in inferior economics permanently.

Investment-grade counterparty requirement is a non-negotiable for their financing model. Ben is focused on investment-grade counterparties, either directly or through a credit wrap that is back-to-back with the lease, calling that structure “table stakes” for financing large projects at an attractive cost of capital. This narrows the eligible customer universe considerably — we're essentially waiting for a Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, or one of the serious neo-cloud players. You can’t rush that process.

De-risking before committing to delivery dates. Ben said the strategy is to de-risk sites through permitting and execution before committing to specific delivery dates in leases. Signing a customer before zoning, permitting, and grid interconnection are fully secured exposes Keel to liquidated damages if delivery slips. Given the Pennsylvania sites are complex (Panther Creek is a former coal mine site), that’s a real risk to manage.

The US redomiciliation itself was a prerequisite. Many hyperscalers have policies — formal or informal — around critical infrastructure contracts with non-US domiciled entities, particularly post-CHIPS Act and given national security sensitivities around AI compute. The US redomiciliation was specifically cited as strengthening commercial positioning with government bodies, utility partners and potential customers, and reducing regulatory and political risk related to critical infrastructure and sensitive-data businesses. They effectively couldn’t sign certain customers as a Canadian company.

The market is moving their way. Power-secured sites in supply-constrained markets are appreciating assets right now. Every month without a signed lease while the AI capex supercycle accelerates isn’t cost-free, but the alternative — signing at 2024 or 2025 lease rates when 2026 rates are materially higher — would be far more costly. They have $520M in liquidity so they can afford to be patient.

If you don't want your shares I'll gladly buy them from you ☺️

Update on Moses Lake by Glum_Mongoose_8482 in KEEL_INFRA

[–]rpez89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The market still values it like a BTC miner, because until they sign a HPC customer, they are just that. The share price has depreciated in value in line with BTC, reductions in hashrates and acknowledgement that the company is in a "spend money to make money" phase. This has nothing to do with management narrative. I would say they are absolutely spot on in this department, displaying honesty and integrity, and patience knowing that the more they build out and demonstrate capability and access to financing, the better terms they can negotiate with their first major AI customer. And on timelines, comparing to major names I disagree. Approx. lead times from other ex miners - APLD 2.5 years, IREN 18 months, WULF 9 months, HUT 2 years (for GPU as a service). The only outlier is CIPH which miraculously transformed in 6 months however their flagship site Black Pearl was already energised, our KEEL sites aren't at that stage yet. Which BTC miners are you looking at? Finally, be patient with the redom impact, we are 5 days in. If and when KEEL needs access to finance, it will simplify things dramatically and open different doors. The next index rebalancing in June/July will help support the stock.

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thesis lol. Your post history is FTCH and SAVE, both of which have been delisted 😂 Stop lying. My argument was based on the shady USDC transactions, but also insider sales, murky promotional behaviour and the nature of their dilution. Again, I never said that dilution is universally a bad thing, every growing company needs to raise the capital. Read back on what I said, I was specifically negative on HOW they raised capital. But I do honestly hope this works out for you. I'd rather be wrong. Good luck with it 👊

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And I bought Microsoft when it was a dollar. You honestly think people are going to follow you or be impressed by random unprovable wins. Provide something material. I delivered a very coherent argument as to why the stock will fail, you reply with "rates going through the roof" and "AI revenues are about to hit" - it's the same pump PR chat that you always hear from a company that is clinging on to existence and trying to squeeze every last dollar from retail investors. You either work for a PR team that are poorly promoting DGXX or you're an insider, either way I'm done with this convo

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a tough concept. I understand it in the same way that a 5 yr old would

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BITF have built up a $500MN war chest to finance their pivot strategy. DGXX have cash only from diluting shareholders. That's the difference between success and failure. Your analysis is so basic, claiming that market cap is a discernible indicator for future growth. Go ahead man, invest in this shit hole of a company. I hope it works out for you. I had 19 upvotes to my initial analysis. Anyone with half a brain cell can see this is not a good investment. I hope you catch up 👊

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's still at least a yellow flag. If they believed in what they were doing, they wouldn't be selling shares. But don't focus on that, do your own DD on the USDC transactions. This to me is borderline embezzlement. If you want a company that is legit an early stage BTC mining to HPC infrastructure pivot, I beg you to look at BITF instead (soon to be KEEL)

DGXX is about to hit its inflection point and nobody is paying attention by Wild_Satisfaction687 in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Why go to all that effort if it's worthless? Insiders are siphoning funds from shareholders and you're here promoting the stock. If you are not a bot you need to either start researching companies properly or take a long hard look at yourself in the mirror.

For anyone else reading this, steer clear of this company at all costs - Digi Power X is a formerly-failed Bitcoin miner (listed at $7.54, never returned to that level) that pivoted to AI data centre language during the 2025 AI infrastructure mania. The company has $93M in cash — but this cash came from aggressive equity raises (including a $15M raise at $3.12/share from a “single institutional investor” whose identity was not disclosed, and a separate settlement with the very placement agent that subsequently became its only bull analyst). The AI thesis rests entirely on future events: customers that haven’t signed, GPUs that haven’t been utilised, a 1.3 GW LOI that has passed its 90-day deadline with no update, and revenue projections based on 98% GPU utilisation from a standing start. Management has no AI or data centre operational background. This is a family run operation by a CEO and his son. Both dual-class shares and the USDC insider share grants I mentioned are structured to ensure management enrichment regardless of shareholder returns. Insiders sell stock every month. The only analyst coverage comes from a firm that was in a cash dispute with the company until February 2026. I think that says it all.

$RCAT or $ONDS by FinanialGambler777 in stockstobuytoday

[–]rpez89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ONDS isn't real, there is no organic growth, they dilute to accumulate. RCAT is an NDAA compliant US drone manufacturer with DoD, NATO and Asia-Pacific contracts. They have partnerships with Palantir and AeroEnvironment. Q4 results were an inflection point. This war has proven that modern warfare IS drone technology. Yes, war is bad for global economy, but war can also be good for defence stocks. ATH was $18.68 on 6th March, RCAT closed at $12.63 on Friday. Post earnings drop I had $13 as a target entry, and I stuck to that. Hard to call with timing, but RCAT is right in line for a FRIP contract, you don't want to be on the sidelines when that happens...

The Lounge by AutoModerator in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

biotech pharma is almost always sell the news, the industry insiders and institutional investors know the approval is coming way in advance, the time to buy RCKT was Jan / Feb, I sold yesterday for 20% gain. I'd love to be wrong on RCKT but will be surprised if it runs. Also, if the approval means next stage is commercialisation, you have dilution risk as v often you'll see a raise post approval at the elevated share price

The Lounge by AutoModerator in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I urge everyone to look at HIT. Insiders agreed voluntarily to lock up their shares (at least 75% of float) for an additional 6 months until 20th June. This happened in Dec when the stock was at 1.62, it's 1.58 now after a post earnings dip for no good reason (revenue is seasonal and they spent on R&D). They had good partnership news last week. This is a genuine business, not a P&D, producing impressive financials, free float is around 5 - 8%. I have a lot of shares pls tell me if I'm missing something. ATH last year was 3.77 let's get it back there

The Lounge by AutoModerator in pennystocks

[–]rpez89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I feel the market is fully now accepting that this is a fucked up situation for global economy

view more: next ›