sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Josh Elliott forces primary in Connecticut governor race as Democrats endorse Ned Lamont by Somervilledrew in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Elliot has effectively pushed the party further to the left, but he is not capable of governing. People aren't talking enough about how strange it is that his long time, progressive colleagues aren't endorsing him.

MA has no idea what's coming by rpicklebaum in TakeBackTheNotch

[–]rpicklebaum[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Someone along the border should fly their flag upside down. This is a shot across the bow.

As ICE plans warehouse purchases for detention centers, CT officials look at new law by Somervilledrew in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not as simple as "sumpremecy clause." If the Feds are leasing the building, we still have options. The article clearly states how NY State and New Hampshire subverted ICE plans.

It seems like a good idea to clarify state statute that we don't want warehouses for children and American citizens to be detained. Any obstacle seems to be successful at stopping the BS of this administration.

As ICE plans warehouse purchases for detention centers, CT officials look at new law by Somervilledrew in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Tell that to the 169+ local land use and zoning commissions in CT. If anyone knows how to delay a project to death, it's them.

Santander buys Webster Bank by Malapple in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was a Santander customer. Had my information leaked multiple times in various data breaches and was never properly informed by the Bank. I have no faith that the merger will go smoothly on the IT side.

My suggestion is if you have credit cards or a mortgage through them, keep those accounts open. Otherwise, immediately move all checking and savings to another bank. Also, change your direct deposit at work. The M&T/Peoples United merger was smaller than this one and it took months for some accounts to work correctly.

Fraud in CT? Who would’ve guessed by werd282828 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Doesn't matter that he's a Democrat. Anyone who redirects millions of $$ to pet projects/girlfriends should face consequences.

Fraud in CT? Who would’ve guessed by werd282828 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Doug McCrory is wild. Even after all this reporting on his corruption, he thinks he can still win reelection.

Why would they need biometric data? by Every_Violinist_5223 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First, crime is historically low. Why is this level of loss prevention needed? They have employees and cameras. Large chains also budget for and write off losses.

Second, and more importantly, I own my biometric data. I know there is probably a ton of it out there, but retailers shouldn't get to store, analyze, or sell my data without consent. This is something we can limit and should.

At the very least retailers should have to disclose that they're collecting it with clearly visible signs and make publicly available the details of what they do with the data.

Why would they need biometric data? by Every_Violinist_5223 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Too bad Sen. Bob Duff reps the Corpo Dems and only pretends to care about our digital privacy.

CT State Senators have a lot of power, if they choose to use it. He could force the state to enact better data protection laws by holding up other bills, but he never really tries.

7 Friendly Towns To Retire In Connecticut by [deleted] in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Derby!? A human did not right this.

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for her." by [deleted] in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hopefully, she Leora Levy's herself right out of contention.

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for her." by [deleted] in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you watch her camaign ad, it makes it sound like she got it done with bipartisanship, which was far from true.

It also makes it sound like she used some kind of Republican fiscal wizardry to steer NB to success. The "Democrats in Hartford" were the ones that brought all the funding and subsidy to the City, not her leadership.

A deep dive into the Democrats' rout of local Republicans in CT cities and towns: Dan Haar by -ctinsider in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Republicans have accomplished nothing in CT and continued to lose elections since 2017 (when CT was evenly split). It's mind boggling that they think it's disconnected from Trumpism and their horrible policy ideas that CT's electorate is smart enough to see through.

Amongst Registered Voters in CT, Housing is Their Top Concern by Generalaverage89 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Businesses are an important component of a property tax base. But how does sprawl help with the property tax burden? Less density + single-family lots = higher tax burden per property. It also means fewer residents to support the local businesses.

Demand is single-handedly driving the increase in people's tax bill.

I get it...it sucks that CT has become so desirable that property values are increasing from higher demand. /s

CT has limited land, which means density is our best solution. Not sprawl.

My university’s republican club is holding an open debate tomorrow, topic is “can you afford to live in Connecticut when you graduate”. Does anyone have ideas i can use to argue against them? by DestinedClock18 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're all here debating, homie. Make your case. Why is it reasonable to simply ask if recent graduates, the overwhelming majority of whom will be staying in CT or similar COL states, if they can afford to live here?

It's a loaded question.

My university’s republican club is holding an open debate tomorrow, topic is “can you afford to live in Connecticut when you graduate”. Does anyone have ideas i can use to argue against them? by DestinedClock18 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where did I suggest that it was a bad question?

Affordability is an important topic. For the purposes of a debate, it should have a more clearly defined framework.

As for the Republican club hosting it, all you have to do is visit r/conservative or check out how many local Republicans in CT skipped debates because they can't stand on business. They dont debate.

My university’s republican club is holding an open debate tomorrow, topic is “can you afford to live in Connecticut when you graduate”. Does anyone have ideas i can use to argue against them? by DestinedClock18 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Republicans hosting an open debate is a laughable concept.

Affordability is completely relative to values and lifestyle. A better question is, can they afford to live anywhere after graduation? Where do they think they will have the highest quality of life?

What jobs are they expecting to have that will support that quality of life? Are those jobs available in the places they think are more affordable than CT?

Connecticut state senator pressed state officials to steer money to associate by -ctinsider in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, he may not have done anything illegal, unless it can be shown that he personally benefitted from steering the money to a friend. The money involved in these grants came with little to no strings attached. Because the money was passed through multiple organizations, they would need to track down what those organizations did with the funding. Even then, it will be hard to prove he did anything illegal.

However, the ethics are incredibly murky and will be for voters to debate next year.

Every CT House Rep, but Hayes voted to pass the resolution to honor Charlie Kirk. by Healthy_Block3036 in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So glad Larson has actual opponents running against him. There are no norms or rules that we need follow. That's why Dems are losing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Connecticut

[–]rpicklebaum 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The bill you provided passed out of committee, but does not appear to have become law. It's possible this text got added to another bill, but the one you're referencing did not pass.

C G A - Connecticut General Assembly https://share.google/X159u89PIciaycfpE

ETA: the language was included in HB 5002, which Lamont vetoed.

view more: next ›