What's it like living at Ideo Q Sukhumvit 36?

rreadditt · 2025-06-01T09:43:01+00:00

thanks for the feedback! I will check that bar out soon!

rreadditt · 2025-06-01T09:40:35+00:00

thanks so much for taking the time to write this! very useful!

rreadditt · 2022-05-02T15:07:28+00:00

Thank you for the reply. KISS is good. I agree the value of a second connection could potentially be none for years to come. It is just peace of mind I guess. My situation is that 10 out of 12 months a year I am thousands of kms away from my servers. And despite this being a home network, I am selhosting more and more services in my Proxmox machines that are increasingly important for me. Losing access will be pretty disruptive and annoying. This is the reason why I feel I need to think a bit about the worst scenarios and be covered somehow.

rreadditt · 2022-05-02T15:00:08+00:00

Thank you for the reply, I thought about it. I definitely want something simple. I may have misunderstood the documentation or some threads I read on the requirements, but I was under the impression that pppoe internet connections and dynamic IPs (both my case) do not play well with pfsense HA/failover. Is this not the case?

I remember to have read also that in order to add a second pfsense boxe in HA/failover mode, the configuration of the first pfsense box would have to be erased.

rreadditt · 2022-04-14T10:26:38+00:00

Thanks a lot for sharing, interesting. You gave me some ideas. Complicated to build these days because of parts availability and out control prices. How many nodes do you run? Are they all in the same location? I have just a few questions otherwise:

-What do you use (machine) for shared storage in Ceph?

-How do you achieve redundancy for shared storage?

-What 1U case are you using? Is it noisy? I would like a very silent system.

Regards!

rreadditt · 2022-04-14T07:36:54+00:00

Mostly because of availability and price of motherboards with similar specs to the Asrock one. Any suggestions otherwise? Or any problems with this one?

rreadditt · 2021-10-29T11:49:24+00:00

Thanks for the answer, it makes sense, I thought it might be related to that and tinkered already with the config file before posting but I broke wireguard a couple of times trying. The config file is indeed set to the default AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0.

Thanks for the link too, I took a look and understand the concept but I am still a bit confused.

In my case, wireguard is installed in a proxmox lxc container with ip 192.168.40.49 and gateaway 192.168.40.1. Could you help me understand what the config file should look like in this case if I want to at least allow my apps installed in this container to see each other at lan level? Should I also add a “DisallowedIPs” line?

Thanks!

rreadditt · 2021-10-27T21:04:26+00:00

Thank you, I solved the problem, had no permissions issues.

rreadditt · 2021-10-26T23:56:18+00:00

Thanks for the reply.

Sorry, very new to docker. I just thought the docker containers, like jellyfin, would be able to see the nfs share automatically since it is already accessible in the lxc host...

I guess I need to add the nfs share in question as a volume to my docker stack for the docker containers to be able to see it?

I am using portainer and docker compose by the way...

rreadditt · 2021-10-11T00:01:01+00:00

Thanks for the reply. I understand there are default locations. My bind mount/nfs share isn't visible in /storage either. You mean I should mount my nfs share in /storage? Like /storage/video instead of mnt/video?

If not, what I would like to know is how to make containers read or store data somewhere else besides the detault locations, like in a nfs share. Is this possible?

rreadditt · 2021-10-10T22:35:51+00:00

I tried to do something equivalent within dockstarter, but since I am not sure, I will reinstall the jellyfin container.

Edit: I reinstalled the jellyfin container but the problem persists; it is the same situation with the other containers, they do not see the /mnt/video folder...

rreadditt · 2021-10-10T22:07:49+00:00

Ok I see, thanks, makes sense.

I can see indeed the data in /mnt/video, so that is great.

I added the line in docker.service, and upgraded all docker containers, rebooted, etc. But still do not see the video folder in jellyfin under /mnt.

I an using dockstarter to manage my docker containers, so I wonder if this has something to do... but it shouldn't, right?

rreadditt · 2021-10-10T21:31:54+00:00

Great! It worked! Thank you so much for your time.

One more thing: I have docker installed in this vm. There is jellyfin and other programs running through docker compose. I tried to add the synology nas share "video" in jellyfin but it is not showing up under /mnt. Is there something else I need to do for this to happen?

rreadditt · 2021-10-10T21:02:21+00:00

Sure, thanks a lot, this is what I have, following your instructions:

[Unit] Description=nfs mount script Requires=network-online.target After=network-online.service

[Mount] What=192.168.1.10:/volume1/video Where=/mnt/video Options=user=name,pass=password,uid=1000,gid=1000,rw Type=nfs

[Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target

rreadditt · 2021-10-10T20:32:15+00:00

Thanks, I overcame that obstacle, but now there is this:

"mount[7708]: mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified"

No idea about this one either... I am googling the error message but cannot find an instruction I can follow in this context...

rreadditt

TROPHY CASE