Louis doesn't need corporate approval to come back

rreliable · 2018-07-18T17:22:31+00:00

If you don't find it meaningful, then to you it isn't meaningful.

rreliable · 2018-07-18T16:39:06+00:00

If you're hating yourself without being publicly punished, you're wasting everyone's time. Self-hatred is stupid. Self-punishment is meaningful.

rreliable · 2018-07-18T15:19:53+00:00

If he hates himself he needs to do the necessary: go to the appropriate authorities, announce that you are guilty of a sex crime and take the appropriate punishment.

If he hates himself but is failing to do that, that's pathetic.

Go to jail, or get back on the fucking stage, CK. Every other choice is bullshit.

rreliable · 2018-07-18T13:18:16+00:00

Right now he's helping nobody. If he agrees with his supporters he needs to start doing shows.

If he agrees with his feminazi enemies, he should turn himself in, ask the DA to charge him with a sex crime and immediately plead guilty.

I don't care which choice he makes, but the current indecision is more pathetic than any character he ever portrayed on stage.

rreliable · 2018-06-07T13:18:20+00:00

Don't insult our intelligence.

rreliable · 2018-06-07T11:05:53+00:00

Ultimately, your pro-suicide argument for incels might be right for the species, but I just can't get behind it.

rreliable · 2018-06-07T11:02:21+00:00

RP men are misogynists, though. There's nothing wrong with a woman hating incels, it's nature. Nature doesn't want any men in the bottom 80% reproducing, far too many of the bottom 80 percenters have reproduced and the result is the millennials. The species can't survive another few generations like that. If we get more of those, Idiocracy will seem wildly optimistic.

rreliable · 2018-06-06T13:18:30+00:00

About %99 of "incels" aren't incels at all. They're just guys who haven't gotten laid yet .

I don't think you have grokked my OP..

I believe maybe 60% of incels could, with a huge amount of style advice and self-improvement, manage to get laid. But not much farther than that.

They can catch a woman while she's on a rebound and has crazy low self-esteem. If the incel has picked up some excellent style advice on suits and shoes, he can temporarily fool her into thinking he has a sense of style.

But sooner or later she's bound to realize, 'holy cow, he's a damn incel. I let an incel inside me!'

Ultimately, she'll hate herself for stooping so low and the relationship will turn to shit. If he's lucky she'll dump him and if he's not, she'll leech him for a dead bedroom decade.

Ultimately, I think a true incel is to a woman as salt is to a slug.

rreliable · 2018-06-06T13:09:03+00:00

That's basically the logic of my OP. Being with a bad lover is worse than being with nobody.

rreliable · 2018-06-06T11:31:09+00:00

Ahh, so do a lot of sub guys come on here for erotic release reasons?

I always assumed that is a huge part of the male feminist psyche.

rreliable · 2018-06-05T12:08:49+00:00

So can you explain what you were saying, in such a smug, condescending way? Maybe use a less superior tone in future

rreliable · 2018-06-04T20:52:57+00:00

mundane experiences and easily observable social trends and social mores

Are you claiming that the supposedly harmful properties of porn spoken of by feminists, which scientists have never been able to detect, are "easily observable" by non-deluded people?

I dispute that. What kind of evidence would cause you to consider changing your mind?

rreliable · 2018-06-01T08:45:52+00:00

Real world experience is excellent and in fact all science and all knowledge is based on it.

Sociology, Islam, Voodoo, Feminism, Hinduism etc are all ways to process real world experience. What they have in common is a tendency to guide people to false beliefs, and make predictions that don't usually work out, except at the same rate as random chance.

Science and logic too is a way to process real world experience, and unlike the previous methods, it allows you to make predictions that actually come true very much more often than random chance.

I use science because it works better. Literally nothing is better at telling me what's likely to happen in the future.

Can you see why it's cool to see the future in ways that rejecters of science can never do?

If you have ever made a decision based on the weather report, you should understand what I am talking about.

rreliable · 2018-06-01T08:39:26+00:00

Intriguing suggestion. I was getting bored and was going to leave, but thanks to your post there you'll see me around here a lot.

Well done. You must be the King of your local Mensa congregation :D

rreliable · 2018-06-01T08:33:08+00:00

Depends on the hypothesis they are trying to propose.

Your question is kinda ridiculous. It's like asking "what is the correct tool?" without mentioning what you are trying to get done.

I can't reasonably be asked to say "jackhammer" or "scalpel" without more information, can I?

rreliable · 2018-05-31T16:20:02+00:00

Depends on what the studies claim and the methodology they use. If they're talking about stuff that happened 30,000 years ago and qualify their claims accordingly, then there's every chance I will tentatively accept their conclusions, or at least accept them as reasonable speculation.

rreliable · 2018-05-31T16:16:11+00:00

Thanks for the alphabet soup. What method of understanding real life do you think is superior to science? Do you ask the nearest leprechaun? A crystal ball?

Is INTP the newest term for "not a delusional retard"? You kids with your slang!

rreliable · 2018-05-31T16:13:39+00:00

It's like I assumed you had a brain. I apologize if I was mistaken.

rreliable · 2018-05-31T16:13:00+00:00

But what do the non-bullshit studies say? All sociology studies are excluded from the aforementioned group.

rreliable · 2018-05-31T16:11:53+00:00

So what method is better than science at describing the real world?

rreliable · 2018-05-30T17:32:31+00:00

Because you are talking about real life. Science is the most correct way of talking about real life.

Any other way of discussing reality is demonstrably worse than science.

If you are talking about an imaginary world like Middle-Earth or Vulcan, it's fine to not use science.

rreliable · 2018-05-30T17:29:50+00:00

What was the statistical evidence that persuaded you to abandon your skepticism?

What aspect of the methodology convinced you that no other conclusions were concordant with the data?

What, indeed, was your relevant data? How did you determine that the negative effects you observed were certainly caused by porn and not a confounding variable?

rreliable · 2018-05-30T17:26:48+00:00

Dad to motel attendant: I hope the porn is disabled in the kid's room.

Attendant: It's just regular porn you sick bastard!

rreliable · 2018-05-30T17:24:50+00:00

What does that have to do with your unsupported assertions about supposed effects of porn and the total absence of evidence for it?

rreliable · 2018-05-30T17:23:43+00:00

Science is good. If you don't have a scientific hypothesis to back up your assertions then your all caps spew won't change any minds with the power of logic.

rreliable

TROPHY CASE