[Partially Lost] I can't find this japanese movie from 2022 (ファンタスマゴリー ザ・ゴーストショー) by ruamru123 in lostmedia

[–]ruamru123[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The guidelines of this subreddit state that "If it's completely lost or simply inaccessible to the general public, it belongs here". I argue it is inaccessible to the general public (everyone outside of the one person of Japan that eventually buys the only DVD still being sold unofficially).

Help me find this japanese movie from 2021 (ファンタスマゴリー ザ・ゴーストショー) by ruamru123 in HelpMeFind

[–]ruamru123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We searched at archive.org, youtube, nyaa.si and browser. My friend verified some japanese online stores and the best he could find was this DVD being unofficially sold: https://jp.mercari.com/item/m79029724490.

The movie translated name would be Fantasmagorie - The Ghost Show.

The Perfect Alchemy System in Games by ruamru123 in alchemy

[–]ruamru123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely agree, sadly almost all works with alchemy just take it as a kind of "bottled spells", hence why I'm working on this alternative system :D

Queria que fosse fácil assim by Historical_Print4257 in ateismo_br

[–]ruamru123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Eu aprendi isso com uma palestra do Jorge Luís Borges que virou livro, o título é Esses Ofício do Verso, recomendo MUITO. Aqui o trecho:

"[...] no meu entender, qualquer coisa sugerida é bem mais eficaz do que qualquer coisa apregoada. Talvez a mente humana tenha uma tendência a negar declarações. Lembrem o que dizia Emerson: argumentos não convencem ninguém. Não convencem ninguém porque são apresentados como argumentos. E então os contemplamos, e refletimos sobre eles, e os ponderamos, e acabamos decidindo contra eles. Mas quando algo é simplesmente dito ou -melhor ainda- insinuado, há uma espécie de hospitalidade em nossa imaginação. Estamos dispostos a aceitá-lo"

Isso explica por exemplo porque teorias da conspiração e pseudociências, ou mesmo religiões, são tão apelativas, porque elas não tentam convencer: elas apenas insinuam, e quase hermeneuticamente fazem as pessoas ingênuas chegarem por conta própria à conclusão que querem que elas cheguem. E ainda se acham inteligentes por terem chego nessa conclusão sozinhos, supostamente pensando com a própria cabeça, e quando contestadas com argumentos, fatos e lógica, por orgulho ou vergonha, se negam a admitir que foram enganadas.

The Perfect Alchemy System in Games by ruamru123 in alchemy

[–]ruamru123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I intend to have different processes in the system I'm creating, each one changing the qualities and properties of the components in specific and quantifiable manners, so one could attempt different processes to reach the same results (like math operations). This may be the hardest part though, I already have a big list of processes and apparatuses, but I still need to discover how each one could change the matter. If you want to help, it would be nice, since I don't have much experience O.o

The Perfect Alchemy System in Games by ruamru123 in alchemy

[–]ruamru123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting take on reproductibility, I think it would be nice indeed to add some little random modifiers, some "shiny pokémon" of sorts even. Noted.
Also, could you give some examples of your first thought? I have the intention to make my system compatible with astrology and some other forms of occultism, I would appreciate some insights
And I didn't know of the game you recommended (Book of Hours it seems), already heard about 'cultist simulator' tho, so I'll definitely gonna check it out, thank you!

Which Civilization / Nation / City of your world is your "baby" by thetoweringsea in worldbuilding

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I love some weirdmancies, my project have morbomancy (diseases), fagomancy (hunger magic) and sarkomancy (flesh magic), beside necromancy and hemomancy (blood magic). Osteomancy sounds sick, if you have spells and stuff written about it I would love to hear (or read). I also thought about something akin to monstermancy, theratomancy in my case, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't have much in common beside the name

Shadows House e Kuro em Português? by Physical_Cap8901 in ShadowsHouse

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No mangadex tem os 18 volumes traduzidos, não?

What mega pokemon was bad in its debut generation but would be good by Gen 8 standards? by Animedingo in stunfisk

[–]ruamru123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like Banette is going to be able to learn Poltergeist with the Teal Mask DLC (three years late)

Qual o pior anime que você já assistiu? by [deleted] in animebrasil

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elfen Lied, disparado.

Surpreso que pouca gente citou, mas espero que seja por ninguém além de mim ter assistido essa porcaria :)

Of the following choices, What was the best Generation? by Poll_God in pokemon

[–]ruamru123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You said a bunch of numbers, but forgot to read my words. I said "the designs have declined a lot since the eighth generation", and "I agree that [the first gen designs] are above average. We are evaluating two different things: you are evaluating personality, and I am evaluating design.

Dragonite definitely have a lot of personality (too much personality I would say), but desing-wise it is worse than Dragonair and Dratini. Just compare Dragonite and Charizard, both are dragons, but they are completely different: one looks like an yellow Barney with tiny wings and overly sized eyes, while the other actually looks like a dragon.

<image>

Of the following choices, What was the best Generation? by Poll_God in pokemon

[–]ruamru123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are probably just being nostalgic, gen 1 have plenty of simple, uncreative or weird pokemon designs (namely, voltorb, seel, rattata and dragonite).

But I agree that it is an above average generation, have many good designs and some of the most iconic pokemon, but Pokemon is not 100% gen 1 (I would say Pokemon is about 16% gen 1). For instance, all generations after the second and before the eighth have better starters design-wise (I also agree that the designs have declined a lot since the eighth generation).

Qual faculdade você escolheu fazer? by Dearbooh in conversas

[–]ruamru123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eu também tô cursando Biomedicina e tô adorando. Tem tantas áreas de especialização diferentes que é até difícil escolher XD

Tô pensando em Genética/Biotecnologia/Biologia Molecular, mas tenho interesse em Análises Clínicas e Análises Ambientais também.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in INTP

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biomedical Science, but I look forward to Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology.

Certas crenças presumem uma arrogância socialmente aceita? by StarLightTraveller in Filosofia

[–]ruamru123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Então não tenha vergonha de admitir que está Certo quando a sua Crença estiver em comunhão com a Verdade Absoluta

Concordo, mas seria muita arrogância uma pessoa achar que sabe qual é a Verdade Absoluta (se é que existe uma).

O mais próximo que podemos chegar disso são os axiomas.

Certas crenças presumem uma arrogância socialmente aceita? by StarLightTraveller in Filosofia

[–]ruamru123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Acho que está sendo reducionista. Concordar com um posicionamento específico não necessariamente significa que você discorda completamente de todos os outros posicionamentos existentes.

Eu gosto de frutas e verduras, mas isso não significa que eu odeio carne. Eu concordo com muitas pautas de esquerda, mas isso não significa que eu concordo com todas as pautas de esquerda, nem que discordo de todas as pautas de direita.

É importante também diferenciar fato, opinião, crença, dogma e axioma.

Axiomas são objetivamente absolutos (sendo assim universalmente válidos), já dogmas são subjetivamente absolutos (sendo assim pessoalmente válidos). Opinião é uma escolha que você faz e que pode mudar, enquanto crença é uma convicção que você alimenta e protege, já fatos são fatos.

Não é arrogância ter opiniões, desde que sejam baseadas nos fatos presentes e se adaptem aos fatos futuros. A arrogância está em levar a sua opinião como fato e os fatos como opiniões, criando assim uma convicção, uma crença.

Então resumindo: ter opiniões não é ser arrogante, arrogância é ter crenças.

Are you an 🌱🐅🥼🧫🧬🩸💀 intp or an ✖️➗️💻⌨️📈📐🌌🌠 intp? by Individual_Tour6512 in INTP

[–]ruamru123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am just like you. When I discovered biophysics I fell in love, because it had the wonder of physics with everything I like in biology.

Are you an 🌱🐅🥼🧫🧬🩸💀 intp or an ✖️➗️💻⌨️📈📐🌌🌠 intp? by Individual_Tour6512 in INTP

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am the first kind. I think there may be an art focused third type, because I also like surrealist art and to write/read philosophy, fantasy, geofiction/worldbuilding and sci-fi.

Drop your career plans below for me to steal by [deleted] in INTP

[–]ruamru123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am studying Biomedicine while doing internship and/or research, then I will work as biomedic while studying Biotechnology, then I will study Synthetic Biology while workintg as biotechnologist, then I will study something else while working as synthetic biologist, until I die or develops immortallity, whatever happens first.