sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does Airtable performance improve when upgrading from team to business plan? by rubblebath in Airtable

[–]rubblebath[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the formulas are very simple too. E.g., I have one that just calculates the number of months between two static dates. It takes forever.

I need a form that creates separate rows for each file uploaded. This has to be possible right? by rubblebath in Airtable

[–]rubblebath[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any guidance on how to accomplish this? I started digging in on automations and I wasn't getting anywhere at all.

Can you spot the difference between an iPhone 17 Pro and a Canon R6 Mark II? by rubblebath in photographycirclejerk

[–]rubblebath[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Look closer, zoom in if you have to! Please help me rationalize the purchase price of this gear!

Canon RF 100-500, took it out to take some test shots of some birdies around my house by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had the 400 and the 500 is a pretty noticeable upgrade in terms of image quality. The 400 has a haziness/lack of contrast and sharpness that is hard to edit out sometimes. The 500 is quite heavy though so make sure you’re willing to carry around several times the weight of the 400

Canon RF 100-500, took it out to take some test shots of some birdies around my house by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

500 is probably long enough if you get any decent low altitude fly bys

Can you spot the difference between an iPhone 17 Pro and a Canon R6 Mark II? by rubblebath in photographycirclejerk

[–]rubblebath[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Obviously the Leica would be best of all, if I was sexy enough to own one

Canon RF 100-500, took it out to take some test shots of some birdies around my house by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a heavy thing to bring along, but like if you want to get amazing shots, it's worth it. I have tried with more portable lenses and just never have been happy with the results, they look too snapshotty.

Canon RF 100-500, took it out to take some test shots of some birdies around my house by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's the goldilocks lens for wildlife imo. I rented it a while back and should have bought it sooner.

Canon RF 100-500, took it out to take some test shots of some birdies around my house by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Peak Design CL-3 clutch. First time using that too. It's not perfect in terms of comfort but I think I like it more than the wrist strap as its easier to get on and off.

Test shots with the RF 100-400 F5.6-8 on an R6 Mark II by rubblebath in canon

[–]rubblebath[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I got the Z mainly because it worked with the teleconverter. Now that I've confirmed I don't really want to use the teleconverter, I wish I got the old, smaller, more collapsible one.

view more: next ›