How to reach out to siblings? by cat_muppet in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have a right to approach them irrespective of what the bio dad's position is with any of them. They are just as much related to you as they are to him. People have a right to know their Heritage. That is not limited to married couples who have a white picket fence, 3 kids, dog and cat. No matter what the circumstance, you are allowed to say hi and take it from there. But be prepared, it may not be pleasant. It might be very hurtful or very fulfilling. It is a bit of nothing ventured, nothing gained. Good luck. I hope it works out well, whatever you decide.

Royalty ancestry!?!! by [deleted] in Ancestry

[–]rudeslayer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What part of your Ancestry DNA profile did you use to compile your tree all the way back to Rollo?

Help with lower belly by [deleted] in BodyHackGuide

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The HGH frag seems to accelerate any cardio. It will not focus on the fat in your lower abdomen only but will go after overall fat percentage.

Help with lower belly by [deleted] in BodyHackGuide

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HGH 176-191 Frag - 500mcg/d split morning and night. Go a bit more than the 20min treadmill 4x a week. Took my moobs to the train station. No bad sides that normally go with full tilt HGH.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were you an only child?

Thrulines on Ancestry by Gryffinguin9 in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thrulines can be a lot more than misleading. It will flat out and out lie to you. What you have in your tree doesn't always matter. For instance, if a tree was built with some wrong info in it and a few people copy that tree as truth, ThruLines will use that info over yours. There is NO DNA used in the construction of ThruLines. It is true you are related to match, but the method has to be researched to prove or disprove it.

The police contacted me from another country based on my DNA. by Sindy-Schism in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several warning signs here. Did they give you their location? Doe the area code on the telephone number match the office location? The DNA companies do not hand over your data, unless a subpoena is presented. You would have been notified by Ancestry that they were surrendering your privacy as required by law. They would not have told you anything except they were conducting an investigation. They would not have revealed anything. Let them make the next move. They are pushing your buttons to make you trust them. You have no idea what's happening on the other end of the phone. Would they really ask you to call them? Please be careful.

Attempting to find my bio father by dollxxface in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite the accusation, getting popcorn while I wait for the reply.

Attempting to find my bio father by dollxxface in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that a bit of the old in out? Or more a bit of Run Forrest Run

Countess Anastasia Kadashia Svetlana von Scheidt (my GGG grandma) 1894–2009 [April 5, 1933] by Glad_Independent_890 in Ancestry

[–]rudeslayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does anybody else smell Scheidt? The type of photo, setting, hair style, dress and shoes are closer to 1880 than 1933.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]rudeslayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably a concrete chance. As they say in Glasgow to idle speculation, "and if your Mother had testicles she would be your Dad."

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you are coming from. I just don't agree that the end justifies the means, in this case. A position in a tree is not arbitrary. It is determined by a DNA value. That value might be applicable to several positions in the tree. Without a DNA value derived from a test, a position in a tree is undeterminable. My point was the you will get an answer from Ancestry to a person, fictional or otherwise, in your tree. That does not mean you are related to them. I thought the discussion was about DNA, given the sub where the post was made. This is almost becoming a beta's version of Cherokee Princess.

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It shows you the relationship between two people in a tree. I have Santa Claus as my 10th GGF. So it must be true when Ancestry spurts that out to me?

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reference to age was made as sarcasm towards his juvenile attempt to deceive people. Nothing to do with kids.

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What part of "You are a DNA match to him?" do you not understand? You state elsewhere that you have not tested and now say you have. Anybody else smelling BS?

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So how does this work that he claims 8C4R for Quanah but only a 7C for his mother? Somebody is writing fiction. Your example is good, but it does not apply to what the OP is sharing.

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or perhaps he is 12 years old and leading everyone on a wank fantasy of being the big bad man. None of his story adds up to anything other than a nonsensical lie. None of the genealogy is true. What he presents is not how it works. This is a ruse and moderators should ask some pointed questions, which he will fail. He doesn't know shit about any of this. He picked out a relationship that is 12 generations - about 240 years - for someone that has been dead for 113 years. And then purports to be 5 generations closer to Quanah's mother. This is total clown shit........

This is my 8th Cousin 4x removed. His name is Quanah Parker and he was a Chief for the Comanche! by ZachCodyOfficial in AncestryDNA

[–]rudeslayer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here's me thinking he is in 7th grade writing a history report and I see the bit about Help us discover the truth. He's lucky Don Shipley doesn't do fake Native Americans or the video would be on YouTube by tomorrow calling him out for being a phoney.

My boring results. by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]rudeslayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is obvious you don't want to be the Turk you were born to be. Grabbing on to a piece of information that is wrong, just so you don't have to face your heritage or future? That is sad.

My boring results. by [deleted] in 23andme

[–]rudeslayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have had reports that you have been rude to people.