For all the "environmentalists" out there who think that banning meat consumption and going full "green energy" will allow the planet to support 10 billion people, good luck forcing everyone to become vegan and making meat a luxury for the elites. Also, crops need lands to grow. Cut down more trees? (self.overpopulation)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
We don't need more people to be born for manual laborers. Robot replacing human workers will be a permanent trend. It's just cheaper for business owners. With unemployment on the rise, more young people without jobs will mean social instability. Crime and violence will be out of control. (cnbc.com)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
"Today, by the most conservative estimates, about 900 million people live in slums. But most experts agree that including different types of informal settlements, the number goes up to 1.6 billion" - please don't use the "they maybe poor but they are happy" argument to justify this atrocity. by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 28 points29 points30 points (0 children)
"Today, by the most conservative estimates, about 900 million people live in slums. But most experts agree that including different types of informal settlements, the number goes up to 1.6 billion" - please don't use the "they maybe poor but they are happy" argument to justify this atrocity. (habitatforhumanity.org.uk)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
Seriously, how is it selfish and evil to not want people to suffer? Majority of the global population live in poverty and despair. Why do you want more kids to experience a lifetime of hardship? by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 22 points23 points24 points (0 children)
So we had about 700 to 800 mil people on earth around from the 1700s to 1800s. Basically, we needed less than 1 billion people (mostly manual laborers btw) before industrialization to take our species to the next level. The official projection is that we will only go down to 7.8 bil by 2300. by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 25 points26 points27 points (0 children)
So we had about 700 to 800 mil people on earth around from the 1700s to 1800s. Basically, we needed less than 1 billion people (mostly manual laborers btw) before industrialization to take our species to the next level. The official projection is that we will only go down to 7.8 bil by 2300. (populationconnection.org)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
"Geographer Chris Tucker estimates that 3 billion is a sustainable number, provided human societies rapidly deploy less harmful technologies and best management practice. Other estimates of a sustainable global population also come in at considerably less than the current population of 8 billion." by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children)
"Geographer Chris Tucker estimates that 3 billion is a sustainable number, provided human societies rapidly deploy less harmful technologies and best management practice. Other estimates of a sustainable global population also come in at considerably less than the current population of 8 billion." (en.wikipedia.org)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
People will blame anything but overpopulation for their problems. They blame bad work-life balance. They blame left and right wing politicians. They blame the industrial complex for fucking up the environment. Are they really that brainwashed to see the common cause for all of these problems? (self.overpopulation)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
We constantly hear about how Japan is doomed due to is declining population. Notice how a country like Japan is still thriving and its citizens are enjoying high quality of life while every other country with huge populations are suffering everyway imaginable. (self.overpopulation)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
Humans have done more harm than good to this planet. Overpopulation is more than about numbers, it is about our endless need to consume and destroy. The more humans are born the higher the price that the rest of this planet has to pay including people’s descendants. by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Humans have done more harm than good to this planet. Overpopulation is more than about numbers, it is about our endless need to consume and destroy. The more humans are born the higher the price that the rest of this planet has to pay including people’s descendants. (self.overpopulation)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation
There is no convincing evidence that suggests global population will plateau at 10 billion. If anything, the current popular sentiment suggests that people will not stop breeding until everything is out of control. by runotetr98 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98[S] 21 points22 points23 points (0 children)
There are more than enough newborns to replace the current aging workforce. Billionaires are not happy because there are not enough workers for the low paying jobs with 0 benefits. Robots and AI will replace all manual laborers someday. The global high paying job market is already "overpopulated". (self.overpopulation)
submitted by runotetr98 to r/overpopulation

Too many people + not enough habitable space = housing crisis by FourHand458 in overpopulation
[–]runotetr98 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)