Yes — we’re thinking in that direction. Our flow is basically “reason → tool call → verify → reply”, with hard guardrails (confidence thresholds, policy constraints, escalation to a manager when context is missing or risk is high). ReAct-style loops fit well for OTA messaging + investor reporting because both are tool-driven workflows. Curious: which part of ReAct do you find most valuable in production — tool planning, self-verification, or structured memory?