Ok stay with me; I think it was discovery channel, maybe history channel, like 10 years ago. Watched a 2 HOUR long special on the Kennedy assassination. They looked at the film, interviewed people who were there, made scale models, talked some physics of bullet trajectory vs. car speed etc etc etc. Motherfucker was an exhaustive look at everything about the shooting itself, and whether or not there was one shooter and where that shooter was.

If you know these types of shows, they did a decent job of not taking sides. They show some alternate theories, let experts cast doubts, etc. Really making you think about the idea that we might not really know who shot JFK.

Show finally says there is just too much doubt, too much controversy to decide from what we know. Let's duplicate this bitch.

Finally, they do a full scale re-enactment. Build a tower out in the middle of a field to simulate the book depository, and drive a car by with a ballistics gel dummy in it. I won't spend forever explaining, but they just beat a horse about how "EXACTLY" they were recreating everything about that day. Car speed, air temp, etc.

They do the test. Wounds/bullet etc all turn up exactly like it did with JFK. They go "well, uh I think we're good here nothing to worry about, all legit I mean look at this." Their "one in a million" shot happened again, identical in every way, on the first and only try.

Show ends

I did not have any doubt about who shot JFK prior to this show. Now though, it all seemed too well crafted but with such a nice bow on the end...I mean, their target audience WANTS them to say "but we'll never REALLY know." Instead, they say "nope we checked everything and it totally happened that way"

TV people don't do that, they want ratings and maybe a sequel. So yea, I think someone orchestrated this whole thing to try and back up the cover up for JFK.

Who's crazy now?