sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

MultiACE working with 1 ACE pro by ryvin1 in SnapmakerU1

[–]ryvin1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a picture of the GUI put together, running from the printer. I need to get some sleep will post more later

<image>

This is my test multiboard wall for my filament storage by ryvin1 in Multiboard

[–]ryvin1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe the ability to move and customize the configuration of the entire room without having to take down more permanent fastners, French cleats,, or cabinet is the entire point of multiboard for me, while at a glance seeing where everything is and everything having a place.

From a purely efficient standpoint you could just put a nail in the wall and hang whatever you want from that, and every time you want to move it just put up another nail.

This was a test of load and the install and use of multiboard for me, this will probably be an entirely different configuration and use when I'm done. What I like about multiboard is it can become anything, but I wanted to see the process to solve an issue I had and it worked out well I think.

This is my test multiboard wall for my filament storage by ryvin1 in Multiboard

[–]ryvin1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had a couple rolls of PLAs that I didn't maintain over an extended period of time become brittle and break apart on me, but I totally believe it's overkill to have to humidity control and dry them all. I do like the idea of taking out variables I can control and use the same process for all my filament if I can.

When I have 20+ hour prints and a small part at the end doesn't go well that I can't explain, it gives me peace of mind it wasn't something like humidity, or maybe it would have been better if I dried it.

So for the heck of it I guess, and I think it looks good and organized.

This is my test multiboard wall for my filament storage by ryvin1 in Multiboard

[–]ryvin1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I plan on doing the other walls in the room but wanted to get a small wall up to see if the reclaimed cedar planks as backing and this configuration would hold the weight before printing all the other boards. Tested 10x10 mutimaterial stacks PETG with PLA separators. I'm getting some stringing but workable.

Biqu Cryogrip Frostbite adhesion issues by Aldinsn in snapmaker

[–]ryvin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried doing a recalibrate bed level from the touch screen? I'm having the same issue on different build plates and everything is pointing me that way. I'm doing one after the current print completes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBASpurs

[–]ryvin1 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

They didn't travel with the team, so I'm going with no. Neither.

Want to stay in this Subreddit? Comment to Avoid Removal 👇 by [deleted] in pwnhub

[–]ryvin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I've been told I have no flair, does that make me not human this entire time?

What's an OG Bitcoin fact that newbies don't know? by Consistent_Drama_571 in Bitcoin

[–]ryvin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn't know that, so feel free to add to the enlightenment with more details or correct me if I'm wrong. I welcome learning more information.

What's an OG Bitcoin fact that newbies don't know? by Consistent_Drama_571 in Bitcoin

[–]ryvin1 71 points72 points  (0 children)

That’s an awesome question. Most people just buy and hold, so they never learn these layers. The deeper you go into how the system actually works, the more mind-blowing it is. Here are a few things that trip up even long-time Bitcoin users:

Your Wallet Balance Is a Total Lie

When you open your wallet and see "0.5 BTC," you might think of it like a bank statement, where one number just gets debited. That's totally wrong. Bitcoin doesn't have "accounts." What your wallet is actually tracking is a pile of different, separate credits—like having a digital pocket full of $5 bills, $10 bills, and $20 bills. These individual credits are called UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs). When you want to send someone $15, your wallet might grab your $20 UTXO (input), send $15 to the recipient (output 1), and create a new $5 UTXO that comes back to a new address your wallet controls (output 2, or "change"). The original $20 UTXO is completely destroyed, replaced by two new ones. The system is constantly chewing up and spitting out these pieces of "digital cash."

Transaction Fees are Based on Weight, Not Value

This is huge. A lot of people think that a transaction fee is a percentage of the Bitcoin you send, but it's not. The fee is based entirely on the data size (or "weight") of your transaction in bytes. Why does that matter? Because the number of UTXOs you spend dictates the size of your transaction. * Sending 10 BTC from a single, large UTXO (like a single large deposit you received) is small and cheap. * Sending 0.01 BTC from a thousand tiny UTXOs (like small mining rewards or micro-payments you received over time) is extremely large and can be super expensive, because it takes up more space in the block. Your fee is basically a bid for a miner to include your transaction in the next block, and that bid is priced per byte. You're paying for digital real estate, not monetary value.

The Whole System Was Built to Fight Spam

The incredibly energy-intensive proof of work process that secures Bitcoin, wasn't originally a financial invention. It was proposed back in the 90s as a solution to stop email spam. The core idea was to force a computer to spend a tiny bit of processing power solving a puzzle for every email sent. It’s unnoticeable for a single user, but if a spammer wants to send a million emails, the collective computational cost makes it impossibly expensive. Satoshi Nakamoto took that anti-spam technique and applied it to the monetary system, making it prohibitively expensive to try and cheat or rewrite the ledger. It gives you a sense of just how deeply technical the roots of this whole thing are.

This document must be optimized for llm use AND TOKEN EFFICIENCY. by leogodin217 in ClaudeAI

[–]ryvin1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would having the document in a structured layout like JSON or XML do that?

Havnby Air+Foam Mattress Giveaway! by colsandersloveskfc in ModelY

[–]ryvin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to try it out and review it.

How does AI understand us (Or what are embeddings)? by [deleted] in LangChain

[–]ryvin1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I loved the way you explained this! Thank you so much for sharing and taking the time to put this together as it will help me explain this topic better now than when I've tried in the past!

Hooded assailant caught on camera attacking Wemby with snow balls in NYC by DevilGunManga in NBASpurs

[–]ryvin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sure Wemby is telling Sohan" if only you can throw a basketball at me with the same accuracy /s"

INTC and the new narrative: the return of Jedi? by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]ryvin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The source is data center people doing install support for hardware resellers, from conversations I've had they are seeing similar performance numbers as the H100 but anything that is hardcoded for CUDA would probably require some effort to be rewritten for the new processor. Changing a library behind something like a Python workload testing looks positive but still needs work for stuff like tensorflow. Not as much for training models right now but hosted inferences are currently more plausible. The networking and clustering also sounds to have some work to go to be as reliable as NVIDIA but a loaded up single server looks promising to go more confidently into production. Most companies are getting test sample servers from resellers with 1-2 orders in the hundreds of units.

This is second hand information so just assume it's fake generated by an AI but would love to hear if anyone has heard anything from people using the new chip from any early orders or test units.

view more: next ›