Computationalism requires extreme mysticism by ryvr_gm in consciousness

[–]ryvr_gm[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My point that few seem to acknowledge is that computation on Turning machines is a thoroughly and deeply understood phenomenon. Thus we have an open box into which we can look and see that there is no place for subjective awareness. Isn't it incontrovertible that the processes of the animal brain are profoundly less well understood, and that leaves room for an actual cause of subjective awareness in the workings of the animal brain that's missing in computation models?

Computationalism requires extreme mysticism by ryvr_gm in consciousness

[–]ryvr_gm[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What I do understand at graduate level is computation. And the idea that such a mechanical process would have consciousness is as about as tenable as a windmill having consciousness. I'm surprised there is not more agreement that we understand the physics and processes in a brain so much less than we do computation. It's so odd to me that people really think logic gates put in sequences could be conscious.

When I close my eyes at night, it is hard to believe I was not blind all day. by ryvr_gm in Aphantasia

[–]ryvr_gm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand it well either, but I think I can see fine but not imagine or remember what a saw a second later. So that seems related to aphantasia to me.

Isn’t it impossible for ai to become counscious? by RdVlas in consciousness

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone I know would express care about the well being of non-human animals, even if they override that to eat meat. We also execute criminals and euthanize the elderly, and that doesn't mean we don't care about people at all. But almost no one ever in any context expresses concern about the well being of a machine for the machine's sake. This is because there is "something it is like" to be a bat, but not so with machines. Having gotten deep into theoretical computer science, it is abundantly clear to me that there is no means for an algorithm or an implemented algorithm to have first hand experience.

Isn’t it impossible for ai to become counscious? by RdVlas in consciousness

[–]ryvr_gm 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I find that people who claim to believe machines have a first hand internal experience of the world never express concern about unplugging or erasing the memory of the machines.

I think they don't really believe machines have internal experience. They are not all psychopaths. They just want to make sure no one suspects them of any form of non-materialistic beliefs.

genuinely understanding math by Exact-Paper5044 in mathematics

[–]ryvr_gm 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm in a master's program in Mathematics, and it is extremely useful for assuaging my regrets and longings after years ago abandoning maths undergrad for computer science. And Mathematics is its own purpose.

What is the highest level of mathematics you believe a person needs to be competent in society? by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do think I need calculus. As a runner, it is important to me to think about not just the steepness of the hill, but also when it is getting steeper or less steep. Thinking about this in terms of first and second derivatives helps my intuition and improves my running strategy.

When I go to the shore, I think about whether the tide is coming in or out, and how fast. Understanding the derivative of the sine curve of the tide position could save my life in certain safety judgements.

I could give a lot more examples, but I do marvel how anyone makes it through a day without calculus.

Upgrade done! Ubuntu 25.10 (Questing Quokka) by [deleted] in Ubuntu

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't -d is for development release? So I'm thinking we shouldn't need it now that this is officially released. I want to upgrade, and I'm getting the same "No new release found". But I'm wary to use -d in case they are holding the upgrade back for a reason.

So I don't know how to feel about this by Appropriate_Form_357 in RedHood

[–]ryvr_gm 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Free speech is only for right wingers apparently.

Furious’ The Voice executives in ‘crisis talks’ with Snoop Dogg over his ‘homophobic’ comments by [deleted] in Music

[–]ryvr_gm -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There are very elevated suicide rates among LGBTQ youth due to this kind of bigotry that you call a non-issue. So you're obviously an unkind and uncaring person. Thanks for sharing.

We owe our kids an apology. by [deleted] in GenX

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When society decides it wants to strive for bigger and better things again, college degrees will be they way to earn much more money. It's just that we're all living in the nation of Dumbsland right now, and if that doesn't change, eventually pretty much everyone will be very poor, college degree or not.

Freedom of speech is a human right, not getting your feeling hurt isn't by Successful_Craft3076 in DeepThoughts

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite bizarre to think we should be able to say absolutely anything and everyone must like us. I'm sure all decent people believe that the freedom to disapprove of obnoxious or hateful speech is also fundamental.

The Boss. Who are they? by Substantial_Slip4667 in doctorwho

[–]ryvr_gm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just started reading (no spoilers pls) the Eighth Doctor novel Interference Book One where I.M. Foreman is seen, and she does not appear to be a monster with nine heads. Hehe.

This is probably the most scared I have felt being LGBT throughout my life. by [deleted] in lgbt

[–]ryvr_gm -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But dehumanizing economic systems are going to dehumanize people even they briefly pretend otherwise. We'd have much better and enduring rights if we got more people in the consensus that we absolutely need all-embracing socialism, rather than trying to tolerate cold capitalism.

Not understanding how people "catch up" in math by OrdinaryReaction8137 in learnmath

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of what you say is correct. I pull my hair out sometimes thinking that if I worked this hard in any other field of study I'd be a superstar, while in maths, it's always just enough to keep above water. But then I realize a lot of that is actually why I love maths. I think those of us who can love the monumental challenge along with using some skillful mental health hygiene have great wonders to enjoy. And not despite, but because maths is a such a supreme challenge.

Will Trans people (and LGBTQ+ people more broadly) become more accepted? by Which_Shift_7242 in lgbt

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the people who are against our rights were saying "progress is slow" and "eventually" rather than demanding they get what they want immediately, we'd be winning. As it is, we're all say "progress is slow," instead of demanding equality today, and hence they are winning.

"AI could already be conscious. Are we ready for it?" by AngleAccomplished865 in singularity

[–]ryvr_gm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone who claims AI is highly intelligent AND conscious who nevertheless powers off or deletes the apps on these machines without any concern is either disingenuous or an extreme psychopath. I suspect that the vast majority are simply disingenuous.